Main:bigenough2 from A

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.5s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.2×

• 21.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x + z, y, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (+ x z) y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((x + z), y, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(x + z), y, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision] * y + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} + x \]

   4. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right) \cdot y} + x \]

   5. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + x, y, x\right)} \]

   6. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + x}, y, x\right) \]

   7. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + z}, y, x\right) \]

   8. lower-+.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + z}, y, x\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + z, y, x\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -22000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.00055:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (+ x z))))
   (if (<= y -22000000000.0) t_0 (if (<= y 0.00055) (+ x (* z y)) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (x + z);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -22000000000.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 0.00055) {
		tmp = x + (z * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * (x + z)
    if (y <= (-22000000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= 0.00055d0) then
        tmp = x + (z * y)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (x + z);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -22000000000.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 0.00055) {
		tmp = x + (z * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * (x + z)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -22000000000.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= 0.00055:
		tmp = x + (z * y)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(x + z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -22000000000.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 0.00055)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * y));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * (x + z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -22000000000.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 0.00055)
		tmp = x + (z * y);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -22000000000.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 0.00055], N[(x + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.2e10 or 5.50000000000000033e-4 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 99.4

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   if -2.2e10 < y < 5.50000000000000033e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 98.4

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -22000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.00055:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-22}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.00011:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (+ x z))))
   (if (<= y -1.1e-22) t_0 (if (<= y 0.00011) (fma y x x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (x + z);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.1e-22) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 0.00011) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(x + z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.1e-22)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 0.00011)
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.1e-22], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 0.00011], N[(y * x + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.1e-22 or 1.10000000000000004e-4 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 97.9

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   if -1.1e-22 < y < 1.10000000000000004e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 69.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-22}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.00011:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 76.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+106}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+41}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.7e+106) (* z y) (if (<= z 8e+41) (fma y x x) (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.7e+106) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 8e+41) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.7e+106)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (z <= 8e+41)
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.7e+106], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 8e+41], N[(y * x + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.69999999999999997e106 or 8.00000000000000005e41 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 78.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 78.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -1.69999999999999997e106 < z < 8.00000000000000005e41

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 77.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+106}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+41}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 52.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -2.5e+39) (* x y) (if (<= x 2.35e+86) (* z y) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.5e+39) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 2.35e+86) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-2.5d+39)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= 2.35d+86) then
        tmp = z * y
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.5e+39) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 2.35e+86) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.5e+39:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= 2.35e+86:
		tmp = z * y
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.5e+39)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= 2.35e+86)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.5e+39)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= 2.35e+86)
		tmp = z * y;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -2.5e+39], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 2.35e+86], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.50000000000000008e39 or 2.3500000000000001e86 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 89.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 43.8%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -2.50000000000000008e39 < x < 2.3500000000000001e86

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 58.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 58.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 28.0% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

   3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 58.3

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 58.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 25.7%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

9. Final simplification 25.7%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot y \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024232 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Main:bigenough2 from A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (+ z x))))