Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, A

Percentage Accurate: 95.7% → 98.7%

Time: 22.0s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 0.9×

• 28.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.7% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot 9 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t, t\_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, t\_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma a (* 27.0 b) (* x 2.0))))
   (if (<= (* y 9.0) -5e+18)
     (fma y (* (* z -9.0) t) t_1)
     (fma (* y t) (* z -9.0) t_1))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(a, (27.0 * b), (x * 2.0));
	double tmp;
	if ((y * 9.0) <= -5e+18) {
		tmp = fma(y, ((z * -9.0) * t), t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = fma((y * t), (z * -9.0), t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(a, Float64(27.0 * b), Float64(x * 2.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * 9.0) <= -5e+18)
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(Float64(z * -9.0) * t), t_1);
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(y * t), Float64(z * -9.0), t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision], -5e+18], N[(y * N[(N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) < -5e18

   1. Initial program 81.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + x \cdot 2\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      5. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      7. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z}\right)\right) \cdot t + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      9. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right)} \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      10. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(9 \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) \cdot t + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-neg-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \cdot t + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      12. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      13. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\right)} \]

   if -5e18 < (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64))

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + x \cdot 2\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      5. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      9. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right)} \cdot z\right)\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      10. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot z\right)\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      11. associate-*r* N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(9 \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right)} + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      13. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot y, \mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

      15. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot t}, \mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      16. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot t}, \mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      17. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 9}\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      18. distribute-rgt-neg-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right)}, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      19. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right)}, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      20. metadata-eval N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot \color{blue}{-9}, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 59.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)\\ t_2 := x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+173}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+288}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (* z -9.0) (* y t))) (t_2 (- (* x 2.0) (* t (* (* y 9.0) z)))))
   (if (<= t_2 (- INFINITY))
     t_1
     (if (<= t_2 -5e+173)
       (* x 2.0)
       (if (<= t_2 5e+77)
         (* 27.0 (* a b))
         (if (<= t_2 2e+288) (* x 2.0) t_1))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * -9.0) * (y * t);
	double t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_2 <= -5e+173) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else if (t_2 <= 5e+77) {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	} else if (t_2 <= 2e+288) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * -9.0) * (y * t);
	double t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_2 <= -5e+173) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else if (t_2 <= 5e+77) {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	} else if (t_2 <= 2e+288) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * -9.0) * (y * t)
	t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z))
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t_2 <= -5e+173:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	elif t_2 <= 5e+77:
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b)
	elif t_2 <= 2e+288:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * -9.0) * Float64(y * t))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(t * Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_2 <= -5e+173)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	elseif (t_2 <= 5e+77)
		tmp = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b));
	elseif (t_2 <= 2e+288)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * -9.0) * (y * t);
	t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= -Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_2 <= -5e+173)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	elseif (t_2 <= 5e+77)
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	elseif (t_2 <= 2e+288)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, (-Infinity)], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, -5e+173], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 5e+77], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 2e+288], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)) < -inf.0 or 2e288 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t))

   1. Initial program 72.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} \]

      2. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      4. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      7. lower-*.f64 74.2

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \cdot -9\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)) < -5.00000000000000034e173 or 5.00000000000000004e77 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)) < 2e288

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 57.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 57.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   if -5.00000000000000034e173 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)) < 5.00000000000000004e77

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 62.8

         \[\leadsto 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+173}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+288}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 60.0% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t\right)\\ t_2 := x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+173}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* y (* (* z -9.0) t))) (t_2 (- (* x 2.0) (* t (* (* y 9.0) z)))))
   (if (<= t_2 (- INFINITY))
     t_1
     (if (<= t_2 -5e+173)
       (* x 2.0)
       (if (<= t_2 5e+77)
         (* 27.0 (* a b))
         (if (<= t_2 2e+306) (* x 2.0) t_1))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = y * ((z * -9.0) * t);
	double t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_2 <= -5e+173) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else if (t_2 <= 5e+77) {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	} else if (t_2 <= 2e+306) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = y * ((z * -9.0) * t);
	double t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_2 <= -5e+173) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else if (t_2 <= 5e+77) {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	} else if (t_2 <= 2e+306) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = y * ((z * -9.0) * t)
	t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z))
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t_2 <= -5e+173:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	elif t_2 <= 5e+77:
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b)
	elif t_2 <= 2e+306:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * -9.0) * t))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(t * Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_2 <= -5e+173)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	elseif (t_2 <= 5e+77)
		tmp = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b));
	elseif (t_2 <= 2e+306)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = y * ((z * -9.0) * t);
	t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= -Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_2 <= -5e+173)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	elseif (t_2 <= 5e+77)
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	elseif (t_2 <= 2e+306)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(y * N[(N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, (-Infinity)], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, -5e+173], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 5e+77], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 2e+306], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)) < -inf.0 or 2.00000000000000003e306 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t))

   1. Initial program 71.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} \]

      2. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      4. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      7. lower-*.f64 74.6

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \cdot -9\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -inf.0 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)) < -5.00000000000000034e173 or 5.00000000000000004e77 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)) < 2.00000000000000003e306

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 57.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 57.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   if -5.00000000000000034e173 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)) < 5.00000000000000004e77

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 62.8

         \[\leadsto 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+173}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 57.3% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ t_2 := x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+173}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+243}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* -9.0 (* t (* y z)))) (t_2 (- (* x 2.0) (* t (* (* y 9.0) z)))))
   (if (<= t_2 (- INFINITY))
     t_1
     (if (<= t_2 -5e+173)
       (* x 2.0)
       (if (<= t_2 5e+77)
         (* 27.0 (* a b))
         (if (<= t_2 2e+243) (* x 2.0) t_1))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	double t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_2 <= -5e+173) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else if (t_2 <= 5e+77) {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	} else if (t_2 <= 2e+243) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	double t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_2 <= -5e+173) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else if (t_2 <= 5e+77) {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	} else if (t_2 <= 2e+243) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = -9.0 * (t * (y * z))
	t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z))
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t_2 <= -5e+173:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	elif t_2 <= 5e+77:
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b)
	elif t_2 <= 2e+243:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(-9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z)))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(t * Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_2 <= -5e+173)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	elseif (t_2 <= 5e+77)
		tmp = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b));
	elseif (t_2 <= 2e+243)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= -Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_2 <= -5e+173)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	elseif (t_2 <= 5e+77)
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	elseif (t_2 <= 2e+243)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(-9.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, (-Infinity)], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, -5e+173], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 5e+77], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 2e+243], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)) < -inf.0 or 2.0000000000000001e243 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t))

   1. Initial program 77.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 16.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 16.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 68.4

         \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 68.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)) < -5.00000000000000034e173 or 5.00000000000000004e77 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)) < 2.0000000000000001e243

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 60.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   if -5.00000000000000034e173 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 2 binary64)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)) < 5.00000000000000004e77

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 62.8

         \[\leadsto 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+173}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+243}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 86.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot t, y \cdot -9, a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* t (* (* y 9.0) z))))
   (if (<= t_1 -1e-39)
     (fma t (* -9.0 (* y z)) (* 27.0 (* a b)))
     (if (<= t_1 1e+109)
       (fma 27.0 (* a b) (* x 2.0))
       (fma (* z t) (* y -9.0) (* a (* 27.0 b)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = t * ((y * 9.0) * z);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -1e-39) {
		tmp = fma(t, (-9.0 * (y * z)), (27.0 * (a * b)));
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+109) {
		tmp = fma(27.0, (a * b), (x * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = fma((z * t), (y * -9.0), (a * (27.0 * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(t * Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -1e-39)
		tmp = fma(t, Float64(-9.0 * Float64(y * z)), Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)));
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+109)
		tmp = fma(27.0, Float64(a * b), Float64(x * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(z * t), Float64(y * -9.0), Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t * N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -1e-39], N[(t * N[(-9.0 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+109], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * -9.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t) < -9.99999999999999929e-40

   1. Initial program 88.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{-9} \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      10. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \cdot -9, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      11. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      12. lower-*.f64 80.8

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

   if -9.99999999999999929e-40 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t) < 9.99999999999999982e108

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + 2 \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(27, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}, 2 \cdot x\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 94.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

   if 9.99999999999999982e108 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)

   1. Initial program 81.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{-9} \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      10. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \cdot -9, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      11. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      12. lower-*.f64 86.4

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot t, \color{blue}{y \cdot -9}, a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot t, y \cdot -9, a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 86.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right)\\ t_2 := t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma t (* -9.0 (* y z)) (* 27.0 (* a b))))
        (t_2 (* t (* (* y 9.0) z))))
   (if (<= t_2 -1e-39)
     t_1
     (if (<= t_2 1e+109) (fma 27.0 (* a b) (* x 2.0)) t_1))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(t, (-9.0 * (y * z)), (27.0 * (a * b)));
	double t_2 = t * ((y * 9.0) * z);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -1e-39) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_2 <= 1e+109) {
		tmp = fma(27.0, (a * b), (x * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(t, Float64(-9.0 * Float64(y * z)), Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)))
	t_2 = Float64(t * Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= -1e-39)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_2 <= 1e+109)
		tmp = fma(27.0, Float64(a * b), Float64(x * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t * N[(-9.0 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t * N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, -1e-39], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 1e+109], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t) < -9.99999999999999929e-40 or 9.99999999999999982e108 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)

   1. Initial program 85.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{-9} \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      10. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \cdot -9, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      11. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      12. lower-*.f64 82.8

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

   if -9.99999999999999929e-40 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t) < 9.99999999999999982e108

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + 2 \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(27, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}, 2 \cdot x\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 94.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 84.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+90}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+208}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* t (* (* y 9.0) z))))
   (if (<= t_1 -5e+90)
     (fma t (* -9.0 (* y z)) (* x 2.0))
     (if (<= t_1 1e+208)
       (fma 27.0 (* a b) (* x 2.0))
       (fma y (* (* z -9.0) t) (* x 2.0))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = t * ((y * 9.0) * z);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -5e+90) {
		tmp = fma(t, (-9.0 * (y * z)), (x * 2.0));
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+208) {
		tmp = fma(27.0, (a * b), (x * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, ((z * -9.0) * t), (x * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(t * Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -5e+90)
		tmp = fma(t, Float64(-9.0 * Float64(y * z)), Float64(x * 2.0));
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+208)
		tmp = fma(27.0, Float64(a * b), Float64(x * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(Float64(z * -9.0) * t), Float64(x * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t * N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -5e+90], N[(t * N[(-9.0 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+208], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t) < -5.0000000000000004e90

   1. Initial program 83.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-9} \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) + 2 \cdot x} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} + 2 \cdot x \]

      5. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} + 2 \cdot x \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + 2 \cdot x \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9}, 2 \cdot x\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9}, 2 \cdot x\right) \]

      10. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \cdot -9, 2 \cdot x\right) \]

      11. lower-*.f64 79.3

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -5.0000000000000004e90 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t) < 9.9999999999999998e207

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + 2 \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(27, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}, 2 \cdot x\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 90.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

   if 9.9999999999999998e207 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)

   1. Initial program 78.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + x \cdot 2\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      5. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      7. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z}\right)\right) \cdot t + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      9. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right)} \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      10. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(9 \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) \cdot t + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-neg-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \cdot t + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      12. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      13. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 86.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 79.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+90}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq 10^{+208}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 85.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), x \cdot 2\right)\\ t_2 := t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+90}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 10^{+157}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma t (* -9.0 (* y z)) (* x 2.0))) (t_2 (* t (* (* y 9.0) z))))
   (if (<= t_2 -5e+90)
     t_1
     (if (<= t_2 1e+157) (fma 27.0 (* a b) (* x 2.0)) t_1))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(t, (-9.0 * (y * z)), (x * 2.0));
	double t_2 = t * ((y * 9.0) * z);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -5e+90) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_2 <= 1e+157) {
		tmp = fma(27.0, (a * b), (x * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(t, Float64(-9.0 * Float64(y * z)), Float64(x * 2.0))
	t_2 = Float64(t * Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= -5e+90)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_2 <= 1e+157)
		tmp = fma(27.0, Float64(a * b), Float64(x * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t * N[(-9.0 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t * N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, -5e+90], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 1e+157], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t) < -5.0000000000000004e90 or 9.99999999999999983e156 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)

   1. Initial program 81.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-9} \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) + 2 \cdot x} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} + 2 \cdot x \]

      5. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} + 2 \cdot x \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + 2 \cdot x \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9}, 2 \cdot x\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9}, 2 \cdot x\right) \]

      10. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \cdot -9, 2 \cdot x\right) \]

      11. lower-*.f64 78.8

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 78.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9, 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -5.0000000000000004e90 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t) < 9.99999999999999983e156

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + 2 \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(27, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}, 2 \cdot x\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 91.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+90}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq 10^{+157}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 83.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+105}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+208}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* t (* (* y 9.0) z))))
   (if (<= t_1 -2e+105)
     (* t (* y (* z -9.0)))
     (if (<= t_1 1e+208)
       (fma 27.0 (* a b) (* x 2.0))
       (* y (* (* z -9.0) t))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = t * ((y * 9.0) * z);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -2e+105) {
		tmp = t * (y * (z * -9.0));
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+208) {
		tmp = fma(27.0, (a * b), (x * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = y * ((z * -9.0) * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(t * Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -2e+105)
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(y * Float64(z * -9.0)));
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+208)
		tmp = fma(27.0, Float64(a * b), Float64(x * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * -9.0) * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t * N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -2e+105], N[(t * N[(y * N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+208], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t) < -1.9999999999999999e105

   1. Initial program 82.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} \]

      2. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      4. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      7. lower-*.f64 78.4

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \cdot -9\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 78.5%

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot \color{blue}{y}\right) \]

   if -1.9999999999999999e105 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t) < 9.9999999999999998e207

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + 2 \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(27, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}, 2 \cdot x\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 90.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

   if 9.9999999999999998e207 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) t)

   1. Initial program 78.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} \]

      2. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      4. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      7. lower-*.f64 76.6

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \cdot -9\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 74.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+105}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \leq 10^{+208}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(27, a \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 53.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+79}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (* a 27.0))))
   (if (<= t_1 -5e+37) (* 27.0 (* a b)) (if (<= t_1 1e+79) (* x 2.0) t_1))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a * 27.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -5e+37) {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+79) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a * 27.0d0)
    if (t_1 <= (-5d+37)) then
        tmp = 27.0d0 * (a * b)
    else if (t_1 <= 1d+79) then
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a * 27.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -5e+37) {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+79) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a * 27.0)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -5e+37:
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b)
	elif t_1 <= 1e+79:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -5e+37)
		tmp = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b));
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+79)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a * 27.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -5e+37)
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+79)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -5e+37], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+79], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 a #s(literal 27 binary64)) b) < -4.99999999999999989e37

   1. Initial program 93.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 71.2

         \[\leadsto 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -4.99999999999999989e37 < (*.f64 (*.f64 a #s(literal 27 binary64)) b) < 9.99999999999999967e78

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 47.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   if 9.99999999999999967e78 < (*.f64 (*.f64 a #s(literal 27 binary64)) b)

   1. Initial program 87.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 67.9

         \[\leadsto 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 67.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 67.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 57.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right) \leq 10^{+79}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 53.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ t_2 := 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+79}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (* a 27.0))) (t_2 (* 27.0 (* a b))))
   (if (<= t_1 -5e+37) t_2 (if (<= t_1 1e+79) (* x 2.0) t_2))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a * 27.0);
	double t_2 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -5e+37) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+79) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a * 27.0d0)
    t_2 = 27.0d0 * (a * b)
    if (t_1 <= (-5d+37)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (t_1 <= 1d+79) then
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a * 27.0);
	double t_2 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -5e+37) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+79) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a * 27.0)
	t_2 = 27.0 * (a * b)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -5e+37:
		tmp = t_2
	elif t_1 <= 1e+79:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0))
	t_2 = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -5e+37)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+79)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a * 27.0);
	t_2 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -5e+37)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+79)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -5e+37], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+79], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 a #s(literal 27 binary64)) b) < -4.99999999999999989e37 or 9.99999999999999967e78 < (*.f64 (*.f64 a #s(literal 27 binary64)) b)

   1. Initial program 91.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 69.8

         \[\leadsto 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -4.99999999999999989e37 < (*.f64 (*.f64 a #s(literal 27 binary64)) b) < 9.99999999999999967e78

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 47.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 57.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right) \leq 10^{+79}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 97.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 6.6e+87)
   (fma y (* (* z -9.0) t) (fma a (* 27.0 b) (* x 2.0)))
   (fma (* y t) (* z -9.0) (* x 2.0))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 6.6e+87) {
		tmp = fma(y, ((z * -9.0) * t), fma(a, (27.0 * b), (x * 2.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma((y * t), (z * -9.0), (x * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 6.6e+87)
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(Float64(z * -9.0) * t), fma(a, Float64(27.0 * b), Float64(x * 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(y * t), Float64(z * -9.0), Float64(x * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, 6.6e+87], N[(y * N[(N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 6.6000000000000003e87

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + x \cdot 2\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      5. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      7. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z}\right)\right) \cdot t + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      9. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right)} \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      10. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(9 \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) \cdot t + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-neg-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \cdot t + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      12. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      13. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot t, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\right)} \]

   if 6.6000000000000003e87 < z

   1. Initial program 82.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + x \cdot 2\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      5. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      9. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right)} \cdot z\right)\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      10. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot z\right)\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      11. associate-*r* N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(9 \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right)} + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      13. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot y, \mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

      15. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot t}, \mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      16. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot t}, \mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      17. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 9}\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      18. distribute-rgt-neg-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right)}, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      19. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right)}, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      20. metadata-eval N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot \color{blue}{-9}, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 78.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 78.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(z \cdot -9\right) \cdot t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 97.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-9, y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 6.6e+87)
   (fma -9.0 (* y (* z t)) (fma a (* 27.0 b) (* x 2.0)))
   (fma (* y t) (* z -9.0) (* x 2.0))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 6.6e+87) {
		tmp = fma(-9.0, (y * (z * t)), fma(a, (27.0 * b), (x * 2.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma((y * t), (z * -9.0), (x * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 6.6e+87)
		tmp = fma(-9.0, Float64(y * Float64(z * t)), fma(a, Float64(27.0 * b), Float64(x * 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(y * t), Float64(z * -9.0), Float64(x * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, 6.6e+87], N[(-9.0 * N[(y * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 6.6000000000000003e87

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + x \cdot 2\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      5. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)} \cdot t\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      8. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      9. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      11. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      12. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      13. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right), y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-9}, y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      16. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-9, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      17. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-9, y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t\right)}, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      18. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-9, y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      19. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-9, y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right)} \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      20. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-9, y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} + x \cdot 2\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-9, y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\right)} \]

   if 6.6000000000000003e87 < z

   1. Initial program 82.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + x \cdot 2\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      5. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      9. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right)} \cdot z\right)\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      10. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot z\right)\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      11. associate-*r* N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(9 \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right)} + \left(x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      13. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot y, \mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

      15. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot t}, \mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      16. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot t}, \mathsf{neg}\left(9 \cdot z\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      17. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 9}\right), \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      18. distribute-rgt-neg-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right)}, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      19. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(9\right)\right)}, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

      20. metadata-eval N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot \color{blue}{-9}, \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 78.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 78.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-9, y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot t, z \cdot -9, x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 31.0% accurate, 6.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ x \cdot 2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* x 2.0))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x * 2.0d0
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x * 2.0

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(x * 2.0)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x * 2.0;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.3%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 32.5

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

5. Applied rewrites 32.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

6. Final simplification 32.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 2 \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 95.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y < 7.590524218811189 \cdot 10^{-161}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< y 7.590524218811189e-161)
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* a (* 27.0 b)))
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* y (* t z)))) (* (* a 27.0) b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y < 7.590524218811189d-161) then
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0d0 * b))
    else
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if y < 7.590524218811189e-161:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(y * Float64(t * z)))) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161)
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	else
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Less[y, 7.590524218811189e-161], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(y * N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024232 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< y 7590524218811189/100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (- (* x 2) (* (* (* y 9) z) t)) (* a (* 27 b))) (+ (- (* x 2) (* 9 (* y (* t z)))) (* (* a 27) b))))

  (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))