Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.9% → 97.4%

Time: 10.9s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 1.1×

• 32.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + \left(a \cdot t + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+277}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a + x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* (* a z) b) (+ (* a t) (+ (* z y) x)))))
   (if (<= t_1 5e+277) t_1 (fma z y (+ (* (fma b z t) a) x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((a * z) * b) + ((a * t) + ((z * y) + x));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 5e+277) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, y, ((fma(b, z, t) * a) + x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(a * z) * b) + Float64(Float64(a * t) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 5e+277)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = fma(z, y, Float64(Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a) + x));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 5e+277], t$95$1, N[(z * y + N[(N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < 4.99999999999999982e277

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 4.99999999999999982e277 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 72.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      4. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + \left(x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} + \left(x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + \left(x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      10. lower-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      11. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + t \cdot a\right)}\right) \]

      12. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} + t \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      13. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \cdot b + t \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      14. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)} + t \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      15. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a}\right)\right) \]

      16. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right)\right) \]

      17. distribute-lft-out N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b + t\right)}\right) \]

      18. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b + t\right)}\right) \]

      19. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z} + t\right)\right) \]

      20. lower-fma.f64 96.5

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + \left(a \cdot t + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\right) \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+277}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + \left(a \cdot t + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a + x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 64.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-60}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -5.5e+18)
   (fma y z x)
   (if (<= y -1.7e-60)
     (fma t a x)
     (if (<= y 1.65e+51) (fma (* a z) b x) (fma y z x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.5e+18) {
		tmp = fma(y, z, x);
	} else if (y <= -1.7e-60) {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	} else if (y <= 1.65e+51) {
		tmp = fma((a * z), b, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, z, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5.5e+18)
		tmp = fma(y, z, x);
	elseif (y <= -1.7e-60)
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	elseif (y <= 1.65e+51)
		tmp = fma(Float64(a * z), b, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(y, z, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[y, -5.5e+18], N[(y * z + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -1.7e-60], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.65e+51], N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z + x), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -5.5e18 or 1.6499999999999999e51 < y

   1. Initial program 91.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 66.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} \]

   if -5.5e18 < y < -1.70000000000000003e-60

   1. Initial program 93.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 57.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 57.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   if -1.70000000000000003e-60 < y < 1.6499999999999999e51

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot b} + t, a, x\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 89.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, b, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, b, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 63.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot a, \color{blue}{b}, x\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-60}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024230 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -11820553527347888000) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 47589743188364287/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))