Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 78.6% → 98.7%
Time: 11.3s
Alternatives: 11
Speedup: 27.6×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 11 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 78.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ \mathbf{if}\;wj + \frac{x - t\_0}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, 1 - wj, x \cdot -2\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{-1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(wj + 1\right)}, \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj))))
   (if (<= (+ wj (/ (- x t_0) (+ (exp wj) t_0))) 1.5e-13)
     (fma wj (fma wj (- 1.0 wj) (* x -2.0)) x)
     (- wj (fma x (/ -1.0 (* (exp wj) (+ wj 1.0))) (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)))))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	double tmp;
	if ((wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 1.5e-13) {
		tmp = fma(wj, fma(wj, (1.0 - wj), (x * -2.0)), x);
	} else {
		tmp = wj - fma(x, (-1.0 / (exp(wj) * (wj + 1.0))), (wj / (wj + 1.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(wj + Float64(Float64(x - t_0) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 1.5e-13)
		tmp = fma(wj, fma(wj, Float64(1.0 - wj), Float64(x * -2.0)), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(wj - fma(x, Float64(-1.0 / Float64(exp(wj) * Float64(wj + 1.0))), Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(wj + N[(N[(x - t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1.5e-13], N[(wj * N[(wj * N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj - N[(x * N[(-1.0 / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] * N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
\mathbf{if}\;wj + \frac{x - t\_0}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, 1 - wj, x \cdot -2\right), x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{-1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(wj + 1\right)}, \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < 1.49999999999999992e-13

    1. Initial program 73.7%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, 1 - \color{blue}{wj}, x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites98.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, 1 - \color{blue}{wj}, x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \]

      if 1.49999999999999992e-13 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)))))

      1. Initial program 96.3%

        \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Step-by-step derivation
        1. lift-/.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
        2. clear-numN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}}} \]
        3. associate-/r/N/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \cdot \left(wj \cdot e^{wj} - x\right)} \]
        4. lift--.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot e^{wj} - x\right)} \]
        5. sub-negN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot e^{wj} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)\right)} \]
        6. +-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)} \]
        7. distribute-rgt-inN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(wj \cdot e^{wj}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
        8. distribute-lft-neg-inN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} + \left(wj \cdot e^{wj}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \]
        9. distribute-rgt-neg-inN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} + \left(wj \cdot e^{wj}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \]
        10. distribute-frac-neg2N/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)\right)}} + \left(wj \cdot e^{wj}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \]
        11. div-invN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \left(x \cdot \frac{1}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)\right)} + \color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}}\right) \]
        12. lower-fma.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{1}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)\right)}, \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
      4. Applied rewrites99.6%

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{-1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(wj + 1\right)}, \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\right)} \]
    7. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
    8. Final simplification99.0%

      \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, 1 - wj, x \cdot -2\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{-1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(wj + 1\right)}, \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
    9. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 2: 81.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ t_1 := wj + \frac{x - t\_0}{e^{wj} + t\_0}\\ t_2 := wj - \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-250}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (wj x)
     :precision binary64
     (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))
            (t_1 (+ wj (/ (- x t_0) (+ (exp wj) t_0))))
            (t_2 (- wj (- x))))
       (if (<= t_1 -5e-250) t_2 (if (<= t_1 0.0) (* wj wj) t_2))))
    double code(double wj, double x) {
    	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
    	double t_1 = wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
    	double t_2 = wj - -x;
    	double tmp;
    	if (t_1 <= -5e-250) {
    		tmp = t_2;
    	} else if (t_1 <= 0.0) {
    		tmp = wj * wj;
    	} else {
    		tmp = t_2;
    	}
    	return tmp;
    }
    
    real(8) function code(wj, x)
        real(8), intent (in) :: wj
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8) :: t_0
        real(8) :: t_1
        real(8) :: t_2
        real(8) :: tmp
        t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
        t_1 = wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
        t_2 = wj - -x
        if (t_1 <= (-5d-250)) then
            tmp = t_2
        else if (t_1 <= 0.0d0) then
            tmp = wj * wj
        else
            tmp = t_2
        end if
        code = tmp
    end function
    
    public static double code(double wj, double x) {
    	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
    	double t_1 = wj + ((x - t_0) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
    	double t_2 = wj - -x;
    	double tmp;
    	if (t_1 <= -5e-250) {
    		tmp = t_2;
    	} else if (t_1 <= 0.0) {
    		tmp = wj * wj;
    	} else {
    		tmp = t_2;
    	}
    	return tmp;
    }
    
    def code(wj, x):
    	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
    	t_1 = wj + ((x - t_0) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
    	t_2 = wj - -x
    	tmp = 0
    	if t_1 <= -5e-250:
    		tmp = t_2
    	elif t_1 <= 0.0:
    		tmp = wj * wj
    	else:
    		tmp = t_2
    	return tmp
    
    function code(wj, x)
    	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
    	t_1 = Float64(wj + Float64(Float64(x - t_0) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
    	t_2 = Float64(wj - Float64(-x))
    	tmp = 0.0
    	if (t_1 <= -5e-250)
    		tmp = t_2;
    	elseif (t_1 <= 0.0)
    		tmp = Float64(wj * wj);
    	else
    		tmp = t_2;
    	end
    	return tmp
    end
    
    function tmp_2 = code(wj, x)
    	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
    	t_1 = wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
    	t_2 = wj - -x;
    	tmp = 0.0;
    	if (t_1 <= -5e-250)
    		tmp = t_2;
    	elseif (t_1 <= 0.0)
    		tmp = wj * wj;
    	else
    		tmp = t_2;
    	end
    	tmp_2 = tmp;
    end
    
    code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(wj + N[(N[(x - t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(wj - (-x)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -5e-250], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 0.0], N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \begin{array}{l}
    t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
    t_1 := wj + \frac{x - t\_0}{e^{wj} + t\_0}\\
    t_2 := wj - \left(-x\right)\\
    \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-250}:\\
    \;\;\;\;t\_2\\
    
    \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 0:\\
    \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\
    
    \mathbf{else}:\\
    \;\;\;\;t\_2\\
    
    
    \end{array}
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Split input into 2 regimes
    2. if (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < -5.00000000000000027e-250 or 0.0 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)))))

      1. Initial program 95.9%

        \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. mul-1-negN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)} \]
        2. lower-neg.f6489.7

          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]
      5. Applied rewrites89.7%

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]

      if -5.00000000000000027e-250 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < 0.0

      1. Initial program 7.9%

        \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. +-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) + x} \]
        2. lower-fma.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x, x\right)} \]
      5. Applied rewrites100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -2, \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, 2.5, wj\right)\right), x\right)} \]
      6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

        \[\leadsto {wj}^{\color{blue}{2}} \]
      7. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites49.0%

          \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{wj} \]
      8. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
      9. Final simplification81.7%

        \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-250}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \left(-x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
      10. Add Preprocessing

      Developer Target 1: 79.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (wj x)
       :precision binary64
       (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))
      double code(double wj, double x) {
      	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
      }
      
      real(8) function code(wj, x)
          real(8), intent (in) :: wj
          real(8), intent (in) :: x
          code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
      end function
      
      public static double code(double wj, double x) {
      	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
      }
      
      def code(wj, x):
      	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))
      
      function code(wj, x)
      	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
      end
      
      function tmp = code(wj, x)
      	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
      end
      
      code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)
      \end{array}
      

      Reproduce

      ?
      herbie shell --seed 2024226 
      (FPCore (wj x)
        :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
        :precision binary64
      
        :alt
        (! :herbie-platform default (let ((ew (exp wj))) (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1)) (/ x (+ ew (* wj ew)))))))
      
        (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))