Main:bigenough2 from A

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 98.8%

Time: 4.9s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y x (fma y z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, x, fma(y, z, x));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, x, fma(y, z, x))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * x + N[(y * z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   2. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   3. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   5. associate-+r+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + z \cdot y\right) + x \cdot y} \]

   6. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x + z \cdot y\right)} \]

   7. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x + z \cdot y\right) \]

   8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x + z \cdot y\right)} \]

   9. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{z \cdot y + x}\right) \]

   10. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{y \cdot z} + x\right) \]

   11. lower-fma.f64 100.0

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)}\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.112:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (+ x z))))
   (if (<= y -1.0) t_0 (if (<= y 0.112) (+ x (* y z)) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (x + z);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 0.112) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * (x + z)
    if (y <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= 0.112d0) then
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (x + z);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 0.112) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * (x + z)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= 0.112:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(x + z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 0.112)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * (x + z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 0.112)
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 0.112], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1 or 0.112000000000000002 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 99.1

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   if -1 < y < 0.112000000000000002

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 99.0

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.112:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024223 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Main:bigenough2 from A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (+ z x))))