Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 91.1% → 95.5%

Time: 10.8s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 0.7×

• 48.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * ((z * z) - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 91.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * ((z * z) - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 95.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+299}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 5e+299)
   (+ (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- t (* z z))))
   (* z (* z (* y -4.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 5e+299) {
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 5d+299) then
        tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0d0) * (t - (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = z * (z * (y * (-4.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 5e+299) {
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 5e+299:
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 5e+299)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) + Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(t - Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(z * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 5e+299)
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 5e+299], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t - N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(z * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 5.0000000000000003e299

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 5.0000000000000003e299 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 71.8%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]

      3. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 81.0

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -4\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+299}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 79.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.0112:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 4 \cdot t, x \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 10^{+208}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot 4\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 0.0112)
   (fma y (* 4.0 t) (* x x))
   (if (<= z 1e+208)
     (- (* x x) (* z (* y (* z 4.0))))
     (* z (* z (* y -4.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.0112) {
		tmp = fma(y, (4.0 * t), (x * x));
	} else if (z <= 1e+208) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (z * (y * (z * 4.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 0.0112)
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(4.0 * t), Float64(x * x));
	elseif (z <= 1e+208)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(z * Float64(y * Float64(z * 4.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(z * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, 0.0112], N[(y * N[(4.0 * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1e+208], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[(y * N[(z * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(z * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < 0.0111999999999999999

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2} - -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-4\right)\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto {x}^{2} + \color{blue}{4} \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + {x}^{2}} \]

      4. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot t\right) \cdot y} + {x}^{2} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(4 \cdot t\right)} + {x}^{2} \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 4 \cdot t, {x}^{2}\right)} \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{t \cdot 4}, {x}^{2}\right) \]

      8. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{t \cdot 4}, {x}^{2}\right) \]

      9. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, t \cdot 4, \color{blue}{x \cdot x}\right) \]

      10. lower-*.f64 76.5

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, t \cdot 4, \color{blue}{x \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, t \cdot 4, x \cdot x\right)} \]

   if 0.0111999999999999999 < z < 9.9999999999999998e207

   1. Initial program 87.4%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 4\right)} \cdot z\right) \]

      7. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(4 \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      8. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(4 \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      9. lower-*.f64 84.5

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - z \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 84.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(4 \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if 9.9999999999999998e207 < z

   1. Initial program 78.1%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]

      3. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 86.1

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -4\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.0112:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 4 \cdot t, x \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 10^{+208}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot 4\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 91.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* 4.0 (* y (- (* z z) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - (4.0d0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(4.0 * Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(4.0 * N[(y * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024222 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- (* x x) (* 4 (* y (- (* z z) t)))))

  (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))