Kahan p13 Example 2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 13.4s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 2.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\ \frac{1 + t\_2}{2 + t\_2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))) (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (+ 1.0 t_2) (+ 2.0 t_2))))

C

double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = (1.0d0 + t_2) / (2.0d0 + t_2)
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Python

def code(t):
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2)

Julia

function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + t_2) / Float64(2.0 + t_2))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\ \frac{1 + t\_2}{2 + t\_2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))) (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (+ 1.0 t_2) (+ 2.0 t_2))))

C

double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = (1.0d0 + t_2) / (2.0d0 + t_2)
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Python

def code(t):
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2)

Julia

function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + t_2) / Float64(2.0 + t_2))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 + \frac{2}{-1 - t}\\ \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(t\_1, t\_1, 1\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t\_1, t\_1, 2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 (- -1.0 t)))))
   (/ (fma t_1 t_1 1.0) (fma t_1 t_1 2.0))))

C

double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 + (2.0 / (-1.0 - t));
	return fma(t_1, t_1, 1.0) / fma(t_1, t_1, 2.0);
}

Julia

function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / Float64(-1.0 - t)))
	return Float64(fma(t_1, t_1, 1.0) / fma(t_1, t_1, 2.0))
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / N[(-1.0 - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1 + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) + 1}}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} + 1}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}, 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}, 1\right)}}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 - \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \frac{1}{t}, t\right)}, 2 - \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \frac{1}{t}, t\right)}, 1\right)}}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

6. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 + \frac{-2}{t + 1}, 2 + \frac{-2}{t + 1}, 1\right)}}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 + \frac{-2}{t + 1}, 2 + \frac{-2}{t + 1}, 1\right)}{\color{blue}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 + \frac{-2}{t + 1}, 2 + \frac{-2}{t + 1}, 1\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) + 2}} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 + \frac{-2}{t + 1}, 2 + \frac{-2}{t + 1}, 1\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} + 2} \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 + \frac{-2}{t + 1}, 2 + \frac{-2}{t + 1}, 1\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}, 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}, 2\right)}} \]

8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 + \frac{-2}{t + 1}, 2 + \frac{-2}{t + 1}, 1\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 + \frac{-2}{t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{t}\right)}, 2 + \frac{-2}{t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{t}\right)}, 2\right)}} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

10. Applied rewrites 100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 - \frac{2}{1 + t}, 2 - \frac{2}{1 + t}, 1\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 - \frac{2}{1 + t}, 2 - \frac{2}{1 + t}, 2\right)}} \]

11. Final simplification 100.0%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 + \frac{2}{-1 - t}, 2 + \frac{2}{-1 - t}, 1\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 + \frac{2}{-1 - t}, 2 + \frac{2}{-1 - t}, 2\right)} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.1% accurate, 2.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334 + \frac{\frac{0.037037037037037035 + \frac{0.04938271604938271}{t}}{t} + -0.2222222222222222}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))) 5e-17)
   (+
    0.8333333333333334
    (/
     (+
      (/ (+ 0.037037037037037035 (/ 0.04938271604938271 t)) t)
      -0.2222222222222222)
     t))
   0.5))

C

double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 5e-17) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 + ((((0.037037037037037035 + (0.04938271604938271 / t)) / t) + -0.2222222222222222) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t))) <= 5d-17) then
        tmp = 0.8333333333333334d0 + ((((0.037037037037037035d0 + (0.04938271604938271d0 / t)) / t) + (-0.2222222222222222d0)) / t)
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 5e-17) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 + ((((0.037037037037037035 + (0.04938271604938271 / t)) / t) + -0.2222222222222222) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 5e-17:
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 + ((((0.037037037037037035 + (0.04938271604938271 / t)) / t) + -0.2222222222222222) / t)
	else:
		tmp = 0.5
	return tmp

Julia

function code(t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))) <= 5e-17)
		tmp = Float64(0.8333333333333334 + Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(0.037037037037037035 + Float64(0.04938271604938271 / t)) / t) + -0.2222222222222222) / t));
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 5e-17)
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 + ((((0.037037037037037035 + (0.04938271604938271 / t)) / t) + -0.2222222222222222) / t);
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 5e-17], N[(0.8333333333333334 + N[(N[(N[(N[(0.037037037037037035 + N[(0.04938271604938271 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision] + -0.2222222222222222), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))) < 4.9999999999999999e-17

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 17.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{5}{6} + \left(\frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}} + \frac{4}{81} \cdot \frac{1}{{t}^{3}}\right)\right) - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t}} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8333333333333334 + \frac{\frac{0.037037037037037035 + \frac{0.04938271604938271}{t}}{t} + -0.2222222222222222}{t}} \]

   if 4.9999999999999999e-17 < (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t)))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.1% accurate, 2.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334 + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -0.2222222222222222, 0.037037037037037035\right)}{t \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))) 5e-17)
   (+
    0.8333333333333334
    (/ (fma t -0.2222222222222222 0.037037037037037035) (* t t)))
   0.5))

C

double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 5e-17) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 + (fma(t, -0.2222222222222222, 0.037037037037037035) / (t * t));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))) <= 5e-17)
		tmp = Float64(0.8333333333333334 + Float64(fma(t, -0.2222222222222222, 0.037037037037037035) / Float64(t * t)));
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 5e-17], N[(0.8333333333333334 + N[(N[(t * -0.2222222222222222 + 0.037037037037037035), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))) < 4.9999999999999999e-17

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 17.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{5}{6} + \frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}}\right) - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}} + \frac{5}{6}\right)} - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t} \]

      2. associate--l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}} + \left(\frac{5}{6} - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{5}{6} - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right) + \frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}}} \]

      4. associate--r- N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6} - \left(\frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t} - \frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}}\right)} \]

      5. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{9} \cdot 1}{t}} - \frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{9}}}{t} - \frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}}\right) \]

      7. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \left(\frac{\frac{2}{9}}{t} - \frac{\frac{1}{27}}{\color{blue}{t \cdot t}}\right) \]

      8. associate-/r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \left(\frac{\frac{2}{9}}{t} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\frac{1}{27}}{t}}{t}}\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \left(\frac{\frac{2}{9}}{t} - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{27} \cdot 1}}{t}}{t}\right) \]

      10. associate-*r/ N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \left(\frac{\frac{2}{9}}{t} - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{27} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}}{t}\right) \]

      11. div-sub N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{1}{27} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}} \]

      12. unsub-neg N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{1}{27} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      13. mul-1-neg N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{1}{27} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}} \]

      14. lower-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6} + -1 \cdot \frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{1}{27} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}} \]

      15. mul-1-neg N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{1}{27} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      16. distribute-neg-frac2 N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{1}{27} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8333333333333334 + \frac{\frac{0.037037037037037035}{t} + -0.2222222222222222}{t}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} + \frac{\frac{1}{27} + \frac{-2}{9} \cdot t}{\color{blue}{{t}^{2}}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 99.0%

       \[\leadsto 0.8333333333333334 + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, -0.2222222222222222, 0.037037037037037035\right)}{\color{blue}{t \cdot t}} \]

   if 4.9999999999999999e-17 < (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t)))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.0% accurate, 3.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))) 5e-17)
   (- 0.8333333333333334 (/ 0.2222222222222222 t))
   0.5))

C

double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 5e-17) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t))) <= 5d-17) then
        tmp = 0.8333333333333334d0 - (0.2222222222222222d0 / t)
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 5e-17) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 5e-17:
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t)
	else:
		tmp = 0.5
	return tmp

Julia

function code(t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))) <= 5e-17)
		tmp = Float64(0.8333333333333334 - Float64(0.2222222222222222 / t));
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 5e-17)
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t);
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 5e-17], N[(0.8333333333333334 - N[(0.2222222222222222 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))) < 4.9999999999999999e-17

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 17.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6} - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6} - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t}} \]

      2. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{9} \cdot 1}{t}} \]

      3. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{9}}}{t} \]

      4. lower-/.f64 98.4

         \[\leadsto 0.8333333333333334 - \color{blue}{\frac{0.2222222222222222}{t}} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222}{t}} \]

   if 4.9999999999999999e-17 < (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t)))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 98.4% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}} \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))) 1.0) 0.8333333333333334 0.5))

C

double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 1.0) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t))) <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.8333333333333334d0
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 1.0) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 1.0:
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334
	else:
		tmp = 0.5
	return tmp

Julia

function code(t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))) <= 1.0)
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 1.0)
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1.0], 0.8333333333333334, 0.5]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))) < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 17.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8333333333333334} \]

   if 1 < (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t)))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 59.2% accurate, 184.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t) :precision binary64 0.5)

C

double code(double t) {
	return 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	return 0.5;
}

Python

def code(t):
	return 0.5

Julia

function code(t)
	return 0.5
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	tmp = 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := 0.5

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Applied rewrites 60.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 61.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024221 
(FPCore (t)
  :name "Kahan p13 Example 2"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (+ 1.0 (* (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))) (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))))) (+ 2.0 (* (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))) (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))))))