Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4

Percentage Accurate: 82.4% → 93.5%

Time: 10.6s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 82.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 93.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{y \cdot t - z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+294}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* y t) (* z (* 2.0 z)))))))
   (if (<= t_1 2e+294) t_1 (- x (/ y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + (((y * 2.0) * z) / ((y * t) - (z * (2.0 * z))));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+294) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x + (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / ((y * t) - (z * (2.0d0 * z))))
    if (t_1 <= 2d+294) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + (((y * 2.0) * z) / ((y * t) - (z * (2.0 * z))));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+294) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x + (((y * 2.0) * z) / ((y * t) - (z * (2.0 * z))))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= 2e+294:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(y * t) - Float64(z * Float64(2.0 * z)))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 2e+294)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x + (((y * 2.0) * z) / ((y * t) - (z * (2.0 * z))));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+294)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+294], t$95$1, N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 x (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t)))) < 2.00000000000000013e294

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 2.00000000000000013e294 < (-.f64 x (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t))))

   1. Initial program 3.2%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 82.6

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{y \cdot t - z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+294}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{y \cdot t - z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 89.5% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{-31}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{t}, 2, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- x (/ y z))))
   (if (<= z -1.95e+21) t_1 (if (<= z 1.75e-31) (fma (/ z t) 2.0 x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x - (y / z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.95e+21) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 1.75e-31) {
		tmp = fma((z / t), 2.0, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x - Float64(y / z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.95e+21)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 1.75e-31)
		tmp = fma(Float64(z / t), 2.0, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -1.95e+21], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 1.75e-31], N[(N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0 + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.95e21 or 1.74999999999999993e-31 < z

   1. Initial program 75.4%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 91.7

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -1.95e21 < z < 1.74999999999999993e-31

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - -2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2\right)\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{2} \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{z}{t} + x} \]

      4. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot z}{t}} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2}}{t} + x \]

      6. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{2}{t}} + x \]

      7. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot 1}}{t} + x \]

      8. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right)} + x \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}, x\right)} \]

      10. associate-*r/ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}}, x\right) \]

      11. metadata-eval N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t}, x\right) \]

      12. lower-/.f64 92.6

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{2}{t}, x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{t}, \color{blue}{2}, x\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 89.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{-31}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{2}{t}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- x (/ y z))))
   (if (<= z -1.95e+21) t_1 (if (<= z 1.75e-31) (fma z (/ 2.0 t) x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x - (y / z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.95e+21) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 1.75e-31) {
		tmp = fma(z, (2.0 / t), x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x - Float64(y / z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.95e+21)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 1.75e-31)
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(2.0 / t), x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -1.95e+21], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 1.75e-31], N[(z * N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.95e21 or 1.74999999999999993e-31 < z

   1. Initial program 75.4%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 91.7

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -1.95e21 < z < 1.74999999999999993e-31

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - -2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2\right)\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{2} \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{z}{t} + x} \]

      4. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot z}{t}} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2}}{t} + x \]

      6. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{2}{t}} + x \]

      7. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot 1}}{t} + x \]

      8. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right)} + x \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}, x\right)} \]

      10. associate-*r/ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}}, x\right) \]

      11. metadata-eval N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t}, x\right) \]

      12. lower-/.f64 92.6

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{2}{t}, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 76.8% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot t}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- x (/ y z))))
   (if (<= z -3.9e-42) t_1 (if (<= z 5.5e-36) (/ (* x t) t) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x - (y / z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.9e-42) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 5.5e-36) {
		tmp = (x * t) / t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x - (y / z)
    if (z <= (-3.9d-42)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z <= 5.5d-36) then
        tmp = (x * t) / t
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x - (y / z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.9e-42) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 5.5e-36) {
		tmp = (x * t) / t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x - (y / z)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.9e-42:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z <= 5.5e-36:
		tmp = (x * t) / t
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x - Float64(y / z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.9e-42)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 5.5e-36)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * t) / t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x - (y / z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.9e-42)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 5.5e-36)
		tmp = (x * t) / t;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -3.9e-42], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 5.5e-36], N[(N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.9000000000000002e-42 or 5.49999999999999984e-36 < z

   1. Initial program 77.9%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 88.5

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -3.9000000000000002e-42 < z < 5.49999999999999984e-36

   1. Initial program 87.4%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - -2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2\right)\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{2} \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{z}{t} + x} \]

      4. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot z}{t}} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2}}{t} + x \]

      6. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{2}{t}} + x \]

      7. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot 1}}{t} + x \]

      8. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right)} + x \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}, x\right)} \]

      10. associate-*r/ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}}, x\right) \]

      11. metadata-eval N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t}, x\right) \]

      12. lower-/.f64 95.7

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{2}{t}, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot z + t \cdot x}{\color{blue}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 83.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 2, t \cdot x\right)}{\color{blue}{t}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{t \cdot x}{t} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 68.5%

       \[\leadsto \frac{t \cdot x}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot t}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 63.2% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{y}{z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y / z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (y / z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y / z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (y / z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(y / z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (y / z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 82.1%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 61.3

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

5. Applied rewrites 61.3%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (1.0d0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0d0) / z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(z / y) - Float64(Float64(t / 2.0) / z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(1.0 / N[(N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(t / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024220 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- x (/ 1 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2) z)))))

  (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))