Data.Histogram.Bin.BinF:$cfromIndex from histogram-fill-0.8.4.1

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.7s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (y * x)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(y * x)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (y * x)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(y * x)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + x \cdot y\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* x y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (x * y)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(x * y)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x}{2} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.1% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-25}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -0.5) (fma y x z) (if (<= y 4.4e-25) (fma x 0.5 z) (fma y x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -0.5) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, z);
	} else if (y <= 4.4e-25) {
		tmp = fma(x, 0.5, z);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, x, z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -0.5)
		tmp = fma(y, x, z);
	elseif (y <= 4.4e-25)
		tmp = fma(x, 0.5, z);
	else
		tmp = fma(y, x, z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -0.5], N[(y * x + z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 4.4e-25], N[(x * 0.5 + z), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * x + z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -0.5 or 4.4000000000000004e-25 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 98.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 98.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]

   7. Applied rewrites 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]

   if -0.5 < y < 4.4000000000000004e-25

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \frac{1}{2} \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot x + z} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{1}{2}} + z \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, z\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+19}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.5e+15) (* x y) (if (<= y 7.8e+19) (fma x 0.5 z) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.5e+15) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= 7.8e+19) {
		tmp = fma(x, 0.5, z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.5e+15)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (y <= 7.8e+19)
		tmp = fma(x, 0.5, z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.5e+15], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 7.8e+19], N[(x * 0.5 + z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.5e15 or 7.8e19 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 71.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -3.5e15 < y < 7.8e19

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \frac{1}{2} \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot x + z} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{1}{2}} + z \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 98.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, z\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 59.5% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -0.5) (* x y) (if (<= y 4.2e-7) (* x 0.5) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -0.5) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= 4.2e-7) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-0.5d0)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (y <= 4.2d-7) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -0.5) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= 4.2e-7) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -0.5:
		tmp = x * y
	elif y <= 4.2e-7:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -0.5)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (y <= 4.2e-7)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -0.5)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (y <= 4.2e-7)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -0.5], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 4.2e-7], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -0.5 or 4.2e-7 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 68.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 68.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -0.5 < y < 4.2e-7

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 47.9

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot x} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{1}{2}} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 47.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 26.5% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x 0.5))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * 0.5

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * 0.5)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)} \]

   2. lower-+.f64 58.8

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 58.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot x} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{1}{2}} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 25.5

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]

8. Applied rewrites 25.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024219 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Data.Histogram.Bin.BinF:$cfromIndex from histogram-fill-0.8.4.1"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))