math.sqrt on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 41.7% → 84.5%
Time: 9.7s
Alternatives: 7
Speedup: 1.3×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}
def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))
function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) + re))))
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
end
code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 7 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 41.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}
def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))
function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) + re))))
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
end
code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 84.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{-re}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))))) 0.0)
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (/ (* im im) (- re))))
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re (hypot re im)))))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (sqrt((2.0 * (re + sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))))) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(((im * im) / -re));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + hypot(re, im))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))))) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt(((im * im) / -re));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + Math.hypot(re, im))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))))) <= 0.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt(((im * im) / -re))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + math.hypot(re, im))))
	return tmp
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im)))))) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(im * im) / Float64(-re))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + hypot(re, im)))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (sqrt((2.0 * (re + sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))))) <= 0.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(((im * im) / -re));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + hypot(re, im))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision] / (-re)), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)} \leq 0:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{-re}}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (sqrt.f64 (*.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (+.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re))) < 0.0

    1. Initial program 11.0%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around -inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}\right)}} \]
      2. lower-neg.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}\right)}} \]
      3. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}\right)} \]
      4. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}\right)} \]
      5. lower-*.f6443.0

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-\frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites43.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-\frac{im \cdot im}{re}}} \]

    if 0.0 < (sqrt.f64 (*.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (+.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re)))

    1. Initial program 45.6%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-sqrt.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}} + re\right)} \]
      2. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}} + re\right)} \]
      3. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{re \cdot re} + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
      4. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + \color{blue}{im \cdot im}} + re\right)} \]
      5. lower-hypot.f6488.3

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} + re\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites88.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} + re\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification84.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{-re}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 47.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\left(im \cdot im\right) \cdot -0.5}{re}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 90000:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, re + im, \frac{re \cdot re}{im}\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -6.8e+136)
   (* (* 0.5 (sqrt (/ (* (* im im) -0.5) re))) (sqrt 2.0))
   (if (<= re 90000.0)
     (* 0.5 (sqrt (fma 2.0 (+ re im) (/ (* re re) im))))
     (sqrt re))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -6.8e+136) {
		tmp = (0.5 * sqrt((((im * im) * -0.5) / re))) * sqrt(2.0);
	} else if (re <= 90000.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(fma(2.0, (re + im), ((re * re) / im)));
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -6.8e+136)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(im * im) * -0.5) / re))) * sqrt(2.0));
	elseif (re <= 90000.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(fma(2.0, Float64(re + im), Float64(Float64(re * re) / im))));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -6.8e+136], N[(N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision] * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] / re), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 90000.0], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + im), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] / im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\left(im \cdot im\right) \cdot -0.5}{re}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 90000:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, re + im, \frac{re \cdot re}{im}\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if re < -6.79999999999999993e136

    1. Initial program 3.8%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im + re\right)}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-+.f640.0

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im + re\right)}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites0.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im + re\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(im + re\right)}} \]
      2. lift-sqrt.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(im + re\right)}} \]
      3. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(im + re\right)}} \]
      4. sqrt-prodN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{im + re}\right)} \]
      5. lift-sqrt.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{2}} \cdot \sqrt{im + re}\right) \]
      6. pow1/2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(im + re\right)}^{\frac{1}{2}}}\right) \]
      7. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(im + re\right)}^{\frac{1}{2}} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \]
      8. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot {\left(im + re\right)}^{\frac{1}{2}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2}} \]
    7. Applied rewrites0.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{re + im}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2}} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in re around -inf

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-1}{2} \cdot {im}^{2}}{re}}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2} \]
      2. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right)} \cdot {im}^{2}}{re}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2} \]
      3. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right) \cdot {im}^{2}}{re}}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2} \]
      4. distribute-lft-neg-inN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot {im}^{2}\right)}}{re}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2} \]
      5. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{{im}^{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2}}\right)}{re}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2} \]
      6. distribute-rgt-neg-inN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{{im}^{2} \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right)}}{re}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2} \]
      7. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{{im}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2}}}{re}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2} \]
      8. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{{im}^{2} \cdot \frac{-1}{2}}}{re}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2} \]
      9. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)} \cdot \frac{-1}{2}}{re}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2} \]
      10. lower-*.f6452.6

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)} \cdot -0.5}{re}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2} \]
    10. Applied rewrites52.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(im \cdot im\right) \cdot -0.5}{re}}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2} \]

    if -6.79999999999999993e136 < re < 9e4

    1. Initial program 53.9%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im + re \cdot \left(2 + \frac{re}{im}\right)}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-rgt-inN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot im + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot re + \frac{re}{im} \cdot re\right)}} \]
      2. associate-+r+N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot im + 2 \cdot re\right) + \frac{re}{im} \cdot re}} \]
      3. associate-*l/N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\left(2 \cdot im + 2 \cdot re\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{re \cdot re}{im}}} \]
      4. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\left(2 \cdot im + 2 \cdot re\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{{re}^{2}}}{im}} \]
      5. distribute-lft-outN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(im + re\right)} + \frac{{re}^{2}}{im}} \]
      6. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, im + re, \frac{{re}^{2}}{im}\right)}} \]
      7. lower-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{im + re}, \frac{{re}^{2}}{im}\right)} \]
      8. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, im + re, \color{blue}{\frac{{re}^{2}}{im}}\right)} \]
      9. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, im + re, \frac{\color{blue}{re \cdot re}}{im}\right)} \]
      10. lower-*.f6439.8

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, im + re, \frac{\color{blue}{re \cdot re}}{im}\right)} \]
    5. Applied rewrites39.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, im + re, \frac{re \cdot re}{im}\right)}} \]

    if 9e4 < re

    1. Initial program 37.1%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{re} \cdot {\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
      2. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]
      3. rem-square-sqrtN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot 2\right) \cdot \sqrt{re}} \]
      5. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \cdot \sqrt{re} \]
      6. *-lft-identityN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
      7. lower-sqrt.f6480.2

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification52.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\left(im \cdot im\right) \cdot -0.5}{re}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 90000:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, re + im, \frac{re \cdot re}{im}\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 47.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{-re}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 90000:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, re + im, \frac{re \cdot re}{im}\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -6.8e+136)
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (/ (* im im) (- re))))
   (if (<= re 90000.0)
     (* 0.5 (sqrt (fma 2.0 (+ re im) (/ (* re re) im))))
     (sqrt re))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -6.8e+136) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(((im * im) / -re));
	} else if (re <= 90000.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(fma(2.0, (re + im), ((re * re) / im)));
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -6.8e+136)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(im * im) / Float64(-re))));
	elseif (re <= 90000.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(fma(2.0, Float64(re + im), Float64(Float64(re * re) / im))));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -6.8e+136], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision] / (-re)), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 90000.0], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + im), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] / im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{-re}}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 90000:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, re + im, \frac{re \cdot re}{im}\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if re < -6.79999999999999993e136

    1. Initial program 3.8%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around -inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}\right)}} \]
      2. lower-neg.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}\right)}} \]
      3. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}\right)} \]
      4. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}\right)} \]
      5. lower-*.f6452.5

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-\frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites52.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-\frac{im \cdot im}{re}}} \]

    if -6.79999999999999993e136 < re < 9e4

    1. Initial program 53.9%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im + re \cdot \left(2 + \frac{re}{im}\right)}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-rgt-inN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot im + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot re + \frac{re}{im} \cdot re\right)}} \]
      2. associate-+r+N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot im + 2 \cdot re\right) + \frac{re}{im} \cdot re}} \]
      3. associate-*l/N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\left(2 \cdot im + 2 \cdot re\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{re \cdot re}{im}}} \]
      4. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\left(2 \cdot im + 2 \cdot re\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{{re}^{2}}}{im}} \]
      5. distribute-lft-outN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(im + re\right)} + \frac{{re}^{2}}{im}} \]
      6. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, im + re, \frac{{re}^{2}}{im}\right)}} \]
      7. lower-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{im + re}, \frac{{re}^{2}}{im}\right)} \]
      8. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, im + re, \color{blue}{\frac{{re}^{2}}{im}}\right)} \]
      9. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, im + re, \frac{\color{blue}{re \cdot re}}{im}\right)} \]
      10. lower-*.f6439.8

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, im + re, \frac{\color{blue}{re \cdot re}}{im}\right)} \]
    5. Applied rewrites39.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, im + re, \frac{re \cdot re}{im}\right)}} \]

    if 9e4 < re

    1. Initial program 37.1%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{re} \cdot {\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
      2. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]
      3. rem-square-sqrtN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot 2\right) \cdot \sqrt{re}} \]
      5. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \cdot \sqrt{re} \]
      6. *-lft-identityN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
      7. lower-sqrt.f6480.2

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification52.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{-re}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 90000:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, re + im, \frac{re \cdot re}{im}\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 47.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{-re}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 90000:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -6.8e+136)
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (/ (* im im) (- re))))
   (if (<= re 90000.0) (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re im)))) (sqrt re))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -6.8e+136) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(((im * im) / -re));
	} else if (re <= 90000.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= (-6.8d+136)) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt(((im * im) / -re))
    else if (re <= 90000.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (re + im)))
    else
        tmp = sqrt(re)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -6.8e+136) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt(((im * im) / -re));
	} else if (re <= 90000.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sqrt(re);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -6.8e+136:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt(((im * im) / -re))
	elif re <= 90000.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)))
	else:
		tmp = math.sqrt(re)
	return tmp
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -6.8e+136)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(im * im) / Float64(-re))));
	elseif (re <= 90000.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + im))));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -6.8e+136)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(((im * im) / -re));
	elseif (re <= 90000.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -6.8e+136], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision] / (-re)), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 90000.0], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{-re}}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 90000:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if re < -6.79999999999999993e136

    1. Initial program 3.8%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around -inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}\right)}} \]
      2. lower-neg.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}\right)}} \]
      3. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}\right)} \]
      4. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}\right)} \]
      5. lower-*.f6452.5

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-\frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites52.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-\frac{im \cdot im}{re}}} \]

    if -6.79999999999999993e136 < re < 9e4

    1. Initial program 53.9%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im + re\right)}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-+.f6440.2

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im + re\right)}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites40.2%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im + re\right)}} \]

    if 9e4 < re

    1. Initial program 37.1%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{re} \cdot {\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
      2. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]
      3. rem-square-sqrtN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot 2\right) \cdot \sqrt{re}} \]
      5. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \cdot \sqrt{re} \]
      6. *-lft-identityN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
      7. lower-sqrt.f6480.2

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification52.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{-re}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 90000:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 43.4% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \left(-re\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 90000:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -7e+139)
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re (- re)))))
   (if (<= re 90000.0) (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re im)))) (sqrt re))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -7e+139) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + -re)));
	} else if (re <= 90000.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= (-7d+139)) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (re + -re)))
    else if (re <= 90000.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (re + im)))
    else
        tmp = sqrt(re)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -7e+139) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + -re)));
	} else if (re <= 90000.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sqrt(re);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -7e+139:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + -re)))
	elif re <= 90000.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)))
	else:
		tmp = math.sqrt(re)
	return tmp
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -7e+139)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + Float64(-re)))));
	elseif (re <= 90000.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + im))));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -7e+139)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + -re)));
	elseif (re <= 90000.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -7e+139], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + (-re)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 90000.0], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \left(-re\right)\right)}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 90000:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if re < -6.99999999999999957e139

    1. Initial program 3.8%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around -inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot re} + re\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(re\right)\right)} + re\right)} \]
      2. lower-neg.f6427.8

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-re\right)} + re\right)} \]
    5. Applied rewrites27.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-re\right)} + re\right)} \]

    if -6.99999999999999957e139 < re < 9e4

    1. Initial program 53.9%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im + re\right)}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-+.f6440.2

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im + re\right)}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites40.2%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im + re\right)}} \]

    if 9e4 < re

    1. Initial program 37.1%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{re} \cdot {\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
      2. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]
      3. rem-square-sqrtN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot 2\right) \cdot \sqrt{re}} \]
      5. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \cdot \sqrt{re} \]
      6. *-lft-identityN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
      7. lower-sqrt.f6480.2

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification49.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \left(-re\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 90000:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 41.2% accurate, 1.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 90000:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot im}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re 90000.0) (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 im))) (sqrt re)))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 90000.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * im));
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= 90000.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * im))
    else
        tmp = sqrt(re)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 90000.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * im));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sqrt(re);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= 90000.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * im))
	else:
		tmp = math.sqrt(re)
	return tmp
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= 90000.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * im)));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= 90000.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * im));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(re);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, 90000.0], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * im), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq 90000:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot im}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if re < 9e4

    1. Initial program 44.7%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]
      2. lower-*.f6432.8

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites32.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]

    if 9e4 < re

    1. Initial program 37.1%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in re around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{re} \cdot {\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
      2. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]
      3. rem-square-sqrtN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot 2\right) \cdot \sqrt{re}} \]
      5. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \cdot \sqrt{re} \]
      6. *-lft-identityN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
      7. lower-sqrt.f6480.2

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification45.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 90000:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot im}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{re}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 26.3% accurate, 4.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{re} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (sqrt re))
double code(double re, double im) {
	return sqrt(re);
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = sqrt(re)
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.sqrt(re);
}
def code(re, im):
	return math.sqrt(re)
function code(re, im)
	return sqrt(re)
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = sqrt(re);
end
code[re_, im_] := N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{re}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 42.7%

    \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in re around inf

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{re} \cdot {\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
    2. unpow2N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]
    3. rem-square-sqrtN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]
    4. associate-*r*N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot 2\right) \cdot \sqrt{re}} \]
    5. metadata-evalN/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \cdot \sqrt{re} \]
    6. *-lft-identityN/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
    7. lower-sqrt.f6428.1

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
  5. Applied rewrites28.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{re}} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 48.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\\ \mathbf{if}\;re < 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{t\_0 - re}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(t\_0 + re\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))))
   (if (< re 0.0)
     (* 0.5 (* (sqrt 2.0) (sqrt (/ (* im im) (- t_0 re)))))
     (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ t_0 re)))))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)));
	double tmp;
	if (re < 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (sqrt(2.0) * sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (t_0 + re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))
    if (re < 0.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (sqrt(2.0d0) * sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (t_0 + re)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)));
	double tmp;
	if (re < 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (Math.sqrt(2.0) * Math.sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (t_0 + re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(re, im):
	t_0 = math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))
	tmp = 0
	if re < 0.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * (math.sqrt(2.0) * math.sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (t_0 + re)))
	return tmp
function code(re, im)
	t_0 = sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re < 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(sqrt(2.0) * sqrt(Float64(Float64(im * im) / Float64(t_0 - re)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_0 + re))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	t_0 = sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re < 0.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * (sqrt(2.0) * sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (t_0 + re)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[re_, im_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[re, 0.0], N[(0.5 * N[(N[Sqrt[2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$0 + re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\\
\mathbf{if}\;re < 0:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{t\_0 - re}}\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(t\_0 + re\right)}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024219 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.sqrt on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< re 0) (* 1/2 (* (sqrt 2) (sqrt (/ (* im im) (- (modulus re im) re))))) (* 1/2 (sqrt (* 2 (+ (modulus re im) re))))))

  (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))