Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 77.9% → 98.2%
Time: 12.3s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 27.6×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 77.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ \mathbf{if}\;wj + \frac{x - t\_0}{t\_0 + e^{wj}} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} - \frac{e^{-wj}}{-1 - wj}\right) - \frac{wj}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, x, x\right)}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj))))
   (if (<= (+ wj (/ (- x t_0) (+ t_0 (exp wj)))) 5e-24)
     (fma
      wj
      (fma
       wj
       (- (fma x 2.5 1.0) (fma wj (fma x 0.6666666666666666 (* x 2.0)) wj))
       (* x -2.0))
      x)
     (* x (- (- (/ wj x) (/ (exp (- wj)) (- -1.0 wj))) (/ wj (fma wj x x)))))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	double tmp;
	if ((wj + ((x - t_0) / (t_0 + exp(wj)))) <= 5e-24) {
		tmp = fma(wj, fma(wj, (fma(x, 2.5, 1.0) - fma(wj, fma(x, 0.6666666666666666, (x * 2.0)), wj)), (x * -2.0)), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (((wj / x) - (exp(-wj) / (-1.0 - wj))) - (wj / fma(wj, x, x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(wj + Float64(Float64(x - t_0) / Float64(t_0 + exp(wj)))) <= 5e-24)
		tmp = fma(wj, fma(wj, Float64(fma(x, 2.5, 1.0) - fma(wj, fma(x, 0.6666666666666666, Float64(x * 2.0)), wj)), Float64(x * -2.0)), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(Float64(Float64(wj / x) - Float64(exp(Float64(-wj)) / Float64(-1.0 - wj))) - Float64(wj / fma(wj, x, x))));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(wj + N[(N[(x - t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 + N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 5e-24], N[(wj * N[(wj * N[(N[(x * 2.5 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(wj * N[(x * 0.6666666666666666 + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(N[(N[(wj / x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Exp[(-wj)], $MachinePrecision] / N[(-1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(wj / N[(wj * x + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
\mathbf{if}\;wj + \frac{x - t\_0}{t\_0 + e^{wj}} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} - \frac{e^{-wj}}{-1 - wj}\right) - \frac{wj}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, x, x\right)}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < 4.9999999999999998e-24

    1. Initial program 66.0%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)} \]

    if 4.9999999999999998e-24 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)))))

    1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Applied rewrites39.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{e^{wj \cdot 3} \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot wj\right)\right) - x \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right)}{wj + 1}, \frac{\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, wj \cdot e^{wj + wj}, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, e^{wj}, x\right)\right)}}{-e^{wj}}, wj\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)} + \left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)} + \frac{wj}{x}\right)\right)} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)} + \left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)} + \frac{wj}{x}\right)\right)} \]
      2. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)} + \frac{wj}{x}\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right)} \]
      3. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)} + \frac{wj}{x}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right)\right)}\right) \]
      4. unsub-negN/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)} + \frac{wj}{x}\right) - \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right)} \]
      5. lower--.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)} + \frac{wj}{x}\right) - \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right)} \]
      6. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \frac{1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right)} - \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right) \]
      7. lower-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \frac{1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right)} - \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right) \]
      8. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\frac{wj}{x}} + \frac{1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right) - \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right) \]
      9. associate-/r*N/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{wj}}}{1 + wj}}\right) - \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right) \]
      10. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{wj}}}{1 + wj}}\right) - \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right) \]
      11. rec-expN/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(wj\right)}}}{1 + wj}\right) - \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right) \]
      12. lower-exp.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(wj\right)}}}{1 + wj}\right) - \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right) \]
      13. lower-neg.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(wj\right)}}}{1 + wj}\right) - \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right) \]
      14. lower-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(wj\right)}}{\color{blue}{1 + wj}}\right) - \frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}\right) \]
      15. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(wj\right)}}{1 + wj}\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{wj}{x \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}}\right) \]
      16. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(wj\right)}}{1 + wj}\right) - \frac{wj}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right)}}\right) \]
      17. distribute-lft-inN/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(wj\right)}}{1 + wj}\right) - \frac{wj}{\color{blue}{x \cdot wj + x \cdot 1}}\right) \]
      18. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(wj\right)}}{1 + wj}\right) - \frac{wj}{\color{blue}{wj \cdot x} + x \cdot 1}\right) \]
      19. *-rgt-identityN/A

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(wj\right)}}{1 + wj}\right) - \frac{wj}{wj \cdot x + \color{blue}{x}}\right) \]
    6. Applied rewrites99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} + \frac{e^{-wj}}{1 + wj}\right) - \frac{wj}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, x, x\right)}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{wj \cdot e^{wj} + e^{wj}} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\left(\frac{wj}{x} - \frac{e^{-wj}}{-1 - wj}\right) - \frac{wj}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, x, x\right)}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.2% accurate, 7.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (fma
  wj
  (fma
   wj
   (- (fma x 2.5 1.0) (fma wj (fma x 0.6666666666666666 (* x 2.0)) wj))
   (* x -2.0))
  x))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return fma(wj, fma(wj, (fma(x, 2.5, 1.0) - fma(wj, fma(x, 0.6666666666666666, (x * 2.0)), wj)), (x * -2.0)), x);
}
function code(wj, x)
	return fma(wj, fma(wj, Float64(fma(x, 2.5, 1.0) - fma(wj, fma(x, 0.6666666666666666, Float64(x * 2.0)), wj)), Float64(x * -2.0)), x)
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj * N[(wj * N[(N[(x * 2.5 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(wj * N[(x * 0.6666666666666666 + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 76.2%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites97.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.2% accurate, 8.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, x \cdot -2.4761904761904763, wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (fma
  wj
  (fma wj (- (fma x 2.5 1.0) (fma wj (* x -2.4761904761904763) wj)) (* x -2.0))
  x))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return fma(wj, fma(wj, (fma(x, 2.5, 1.0) - fma(wj, (x * -2.4761904761904763), wj)), (x * -2.0)), x);
}
function code(wj, x)
	return fma(wj, fma(wj, Float64(fma(x, 2.5, 1.0) - fma(wj, Float64(x * -2.4761904761904763), wj)), Float64(x * -2.0)), x)
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj * N[(wj * N[(N[(x * 2.5 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(wj * N[(x * -2.4761904761904763), $MachinePrecision] + wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, x \cdot -2.4761904761904763, wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 76.2%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites97.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. Applied rewrites37.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right), 0.2962962962962963, \left(x \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot -8\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot 2, x \cdot 2 - x \cdot 0.6666666666666666, \left(x \cdot x\right) \cdot 0.4444444444444444\right)}}, wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{5}{2}, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \frac{-52}{21} \cdot \color{blue}{x}, wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites97.2%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, x \cdot \color{blue}{-2.4761904761904763}, wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \]
      2. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 4: 95.8% accurate, 8.9× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - x \cdot \left(wj \cdot -2.4761904761904763\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (wj x)
       :precision binary64
       (fma
        wj
        (fma wj (- (fma x 2.5 1.0) (* x (* wj -2.4761904761904763))) (* x -2.0))
        x))
      double code(double wj, double x) {
      	return fma(wj, fma(wj, (fma(x, 2.5, 1.0) - (x * (wj * -2.4761904761904763))), (x * -2.0)), x);
      }
      
      function code(wj, x)
      	return fma(wj, fma(wj, Float64(fma(x, 2.5, 1.0) - Float64(x * Float64(wj * -2.4761904761904763))), Float64(x * -2.0)), x)
      end
      
      code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj * N[(wj * N[(N[(x * 2.5 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * N[(wj * -2.4761904761904763), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - x \cdot \left(wj \cdot -2.4761904761904763\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Initial program 76.2%

        \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
      4. Applied rewrites97.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)} \]
      5. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites37.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right), 0.2962962962962963, \left(x \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot -8\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot 2, x \cdot 2 - x \cdot 0.6666666666666666, \left(x \cdot x\right) \cdot 0.4444444444444444\right)}}, wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \]
        2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{5}{2}, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \frac{-52}{21} \cdot \color{blue}{x}, wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites97.2%

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, x \cdot \color{blue}{-2.4761904761904763}, wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \]
          2. Taylor expanded in x around inf

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{5}{2}, 1\right) - \frac{-52}{21} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot x\right)}, x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \]
          3. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites96.8%

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \left(wj \cdot -2.4761904761904763\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x}, x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \]
            2. Final simplification96.8%

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - x \cdot \left(wj \cdot -2.4761904761904763\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right) \]
            3. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 5: 95.7% accurate, 13.8× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -2, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, 2.5, wj\right)\right), x\right) \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (wj x)
             :precision binary64
             (fma wj (fma x -2.0 (fma (* wj x) 2.5 wj)) x))
            double code(double wj, double x) {
            	return fma(wj, fma(x, -2.0, fma((wj * x), 2.5, wj)), x);
            }
            
            function code(wj, x)
            	return fma(wj, fma(x, -2.0, fma(Float64(wj * x), 2.5, wj)), x)
            end
            
            code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj * N[(x * -2.0 + N[(N[(wj * x), $MachinePrecision] * 2.5 + wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -2, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, 2.5, wj\right)\right), x\right)
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 76.2%

              \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
            2. Add Preprocessing
            3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
            4. Step-by-step derivation
              1. +-commutativeN/A

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) + x} \]
              2. lower-fma.f64N/A

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x, x\right)} \]
            5. Applied rewrites96.8%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -2, \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, 2.5, wj\right)\right), x\right)} \]
            6. Final simplification96.8%

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -2, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, 2.5, wj\right)\right), x\right) \]
            7. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 6: 95.5% accurate, 22.1× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, -wj, wj\right), x\right) \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma wj (fma wj (- wj) wj) x))
            double code(double wj, double x) {
            	return fma(wj, fma(wj, -wj, wj), x);
            }
            
            function code(wj, x)
            	return fma(wj, fma(wj, Float64(-wj), wj), x)
            end
            
            code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj * N[(wj * (-wj) + wj), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, -wj, wj\right), x\right)
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 76.2%

              \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
            2. Add Preprocessing
            3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
            4. Applied rewrites97.2%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)} \]
            5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right)}, x\right) \]
            6. Step-by-step derivation
              1. Applied rewrites96.7%

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \color{blue}{-wj}, wj\right), x\right) \]
              2. Add Preprocessing

              Alternative 7: 84.7% accurate, 27.6× speedup?

              \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, wj \cdot -2, x\right) \end{array} \]
              (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma x (* wj -2.0) x))
              double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return fma(x, (wj * -2.0), x);
              }
              
              function code(wj, x)
              	return fma(x, Float64(wj * -2.0), x)
              end
              
              code[wj_, x_] := N[(x * N[(wj * -2.0), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]
              
              \begin{array}{l}
              
              \\
              \mathsf{fma}\left(x, wj \cdot -2, x\right)
              \end{array}
              
              Derivation
              1. Initial program 76.2%

                \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
              2. Add Preprocessing
              3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
              4. Step-by-step derivation
                1. +-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x} \]
                2. associate-*r*N/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot wj\right) \cdot x} + x \]
                3. *-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-2 \cdot wj\right)} + x \]
                4. lower-fma.f64N/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -2 \cdot wj, x\right)} \]
                5. *-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{wj \cdot -2}, x\right) \]
                6. lower-*.f6484.6

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{wj \cdot -2}, x\right) \]
              5. Applied rewrites84.6%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, wj \cdot -2, x\right)} \]
              6. Add Preprocessing

              Alternative 8: 72.7% accurate, 55.2× speedup?

              \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(-x\right) \end{array} \]
              (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (- wj (- x)))
              double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return wj - -x;
              }
              
              real(8) function code(wj, x)
                  real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                  real(8), intent (in) :: x
                  code = wj - -x
              end function
              
              public static double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return wj - -x;
              }
              
              def code(wj, x):
              	return wj - -x
              
              function code(wj, x)
              	return Float64(wj - Float64(-x))
              end
              
              function tmp = code(wj, x)
              	tmp = wj - -x;
              end
              
              code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - (-x)), $MachinePrecision]
              
              \begin{array}{l}
              
              \\
              wj - \left(-x\right)
              \end{array}
              
              Derivation
              1. Initial program 76.2%

                \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
              2. Add Preprocessing
              3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} \]
              4. Step-by-step derivation
                1. mul-1-negN/A

                  \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)} \]
                2. lower-neg.f6471.9

                  \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]
              5. Applied rewrites71.9%

                \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]
              6. Add Preprocessing

              Alternative 9: 4.2% accurate, 82.8× speedup?

              \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - 1 \end{array} \]
              (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (- wj 1.0))
              double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return wj - 1.0;
              }
              
              real(8) function code(wj, x)
                  real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                  real(8), intent (in) :: x
                  code = wj - 1.0d0
              end function
              
              public static double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return wj - 1.0;
              }
              
              def code(wj, x):
              	return wj - 1.0
              
              function code(wj, x)
              	return Float64(wj - 1.0)
              end
              
              function tmp = code(wj, x)
              	tmp = wj - 1.0;
              end
              
              code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]
              
              \begin{array}{l}
              
              \\
              wj - 1
              \end{array}
              
              Derivation
              1. Initial program 76.2%

                \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
              2. Add Preprocessing
              3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

                \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
              4. Step-by-step derivation
                1. Applied rewrites3.5%

                  \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
                2. Add Preprocessing

                Developer Target 1: 78.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

                \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]
                (FPCore (wj x)
                 :precision binary64
                 (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))
                double code(double wj, double x) {
                	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
                }
                
                real(8) function code(wj, x)
                    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                    real(8), intent (in) :: x
                    code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
                end function
                
                public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
                }
                
                def code(wj, x):
                	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))
                
                function code(wj, x)
                	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
                end
                
                function tmp = code(wj, x)
                	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
                end
                
                code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
                
                \begin{array}{l}
                
                \\
                wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)
                \end{array}
                

                Reproduce

                ?
                herbie shell --seed 2024219 
                (FPCore (wj x)
                  :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
                  :precision binary64
                
                  :alt
                  (! :herbie-platform default (let ((ew (exp wj))) (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1)) (/ x (+ ew (* wj ew)))))))
                
                  (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))