Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 77.9% → 98.0%
Time: 11.5s
Alternatives: 11
Speedup: 47.3×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 11 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 77.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.0% accurate, 2.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{-1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(wj + 1\right)}, \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= wj -4.2e-6)
   (- wj (fma x (/ -1.0 (* (exp wj) (+ wj 1.0))) (/ wj (+ wj 1.0))))
   (fma
    wj
    (fma
     wj
     (- (fma x 2.5 1.0) (fma wj (fma x 0.6666666666666666 (* x 2.0)) wj))
     (* x -2.0))
    x)))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (wj <= -4.2e-6) {
		tmp = wj - fma(x, (-1.0 / (exp(wj) * (wj + 1.0))), (wj / (wj + 1.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(wj, fma(wj, (fma(x, 2.5, 1.0) - fma(wj, fma(x, 0.6666666666666666, (x * 2.0)), wj)), (x * -2.0)), x);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(wj, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (wj <= -4.2e-6)
		tmp = Float64(wj - fma(x, Float64(-1.0 / Float64(exp(wj) * Float64(wj + 1.0))), Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0))));
	else
		tmp = fma(wj, fma(wj, Float64(fma(x, 2.5, 1.0) - fma(wj, fma(x, 0.6666666666666666, Float64(x * 2.0)), wj)), Float64(x * -2.0)), x);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[wj_, x_] := If[LessEqual[wj, -4.2e-6], N[(wj - N[(x * N[(-1.0 / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] * N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj * N[(wj * N[(N[(x * 2.5 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(wj * N[(x * 0.6666666666666666 + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\
\;\;\;\;wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{-1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(wj + 1\right)}, \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if wj < -4.1999999999999996e-6

    1. Initial program 51.9%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-exp.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{e^{wj}} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      2. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot e^{wj}} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      3. lift--.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      4. lift-exp.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{e^{wj}} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      5. lift-exp.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot \color{blue}{e^{wj}}} \]
      6. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + \color{blue}{wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
      7. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
      8. div-invN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot e^{wj} - x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
      9. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \cdot \left(wj \cdot e^{wj} - x\right)} \]
      10. lift--.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot e^{wj} - x\right)} \]
      11. sub-negN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot e^{wj} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)\right)} \]
      12. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)} \]
      13. distribute-rgt-inN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(wj \cdot e^{wj}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
      14. div-invN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr95.0%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{-1}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(wj + 1\right)}, \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\right)} \]

    if -4.1999999999999996e-6 < wj

    1. Initial program 81.4%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Simplified99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.5, 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.6666666666666666, x \cdot 2\right), wj\right), x \cdot -2\right), x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 81.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ t_1 := wj + \frac{x - t\_0}{e^{wj} + t\_0}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-287}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-280}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj))) (t_1 (+ wj (/ (- x t_0) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
   (if (<= t_1 -5e-287) (+ wj x) (if (<= t_1 4e-280) (* wj wj) (+ wj x)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	double t_1 = wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -5e-287) {
		tmp = wj + x;
	} else if (t_1 <= 4e-280) {
		tmp = wj * wj;
	} else {
		tmp = wj + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    t_1 = wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
    if (t_1 <= (-5d-287)) then
        tmp = wj + x
    else if (t_1 <= 4d-280) then
        tmp = wj * wj
    else
        tmp = wj + x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	double t_1 = wj + ((x - t_0) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -5e-287) {
		tmp = wj + x;
	} else if (t_1 <= 4e-280) {
		tmp = wj * wj;
	} else {
		tmp = wj + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	t_1 = wj + ((x - t_0) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -5e-287:
		tmp = wj + x
	elif t_1 <= 4e-280:
		tmp = wj * wj
	else:
		tmp = wj + x
	return tmp
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	t_1 = Float64(wj + Float64(Float64(x - t_0) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -5e-287)
		tmp = Float64(wj + x);
	elseif (t_1 <= 4e-280)
		tmp = Float64(wj * wj);
	else
		tmp = Float64(wj + x);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	t_1 = wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -5e-287)
		tmp = wj + x;
	elseif (t_1 <= 4e-280)
		tmp = wj * wj;
	else
		tmp = wj + x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(wj + N[(N[(x - t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -5e-287], N[(wj + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 4e-280], N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj + x), $MachinePrecision]]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
t_1 := wj + \frac{x - t\_0}{e^{wj} + t\_0}\\
\mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-287}:\\
\;\;\;\;wj + x\\

\mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-280}:\\
\;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;wj + x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < -5.00000000000000025e-287 or 3.9999999999999998e-280 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)))))

    1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)} \]
      2. lower-neg.f6488.8

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]
    5. Simplified88.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]

    if -5.00000000000000025e-287 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < 3.9999999999999998e-280

    1. Initial program 6.7%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-rgt1-inN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
      2. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + wj\right)} \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      3. times-fracN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{wj}{1 + wj} \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} \]
      4. *-inversesN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj}{1 + wj} \cdot \color{blue}{1} \]
      5. associate-*l/N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot 1}{1 + wj}} \]
      6. *-rgt-identityN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj}}{1 + wj} \]
      7. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{wj}{1 + wj}} \]
      8. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj}{\color{blue}{wj + 1}} \]
      9. lower-+.f645.7

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj}{\color{blue}{wj + 1}} \]
    5. Simplified5.7%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{wj}{wj + 1}} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{wj}^{2}} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot wj} \]
      2. lower-*.f6450.6

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot wj} \]
    8. Simplified50.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot wj} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification81.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-287}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-280}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + x\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 79.0% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
}
def code(wj, x):
	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))
function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024218 
(FPCore (wj x)
  :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (let ((ew (exp wj))) (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1)) (/ x (+ ew (* wj ew)))))))

  (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))