Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.2s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((1.0d0 / 8.0d0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 8.0) * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((1.0d0 / 8.0d0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 8.0) * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((1.0d0 / 8.0d0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 8.0) * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 87.9% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, x \cdot 0.125\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot z \leq 0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* y z) -5e-26)
   (fma y (* z -0.5) (* x 0.125))
   (if (<= (* y z) 0.01) (fma 0.125 x t) (fma y (* z -0.5) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * z) <= -5e-26) {
		tmp = fma(y, (z * -0.5), (x * 0.125));
	} else if ((y * z) <= 0.01) {
		tmp = fma(0.125, x, t);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, (z * -0.5), t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * z) <= -5e-26)
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(z * -0.5), Float64(x * 0.125));
	elseif (Float64(y * z) <= 0.01)
		tmp = fma(0.125, x, t);
	else
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(z * -0.5), t);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], -5e-26], N[(y * N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 0.125), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], 0.01], N[(0.125 * x + t), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y z) < -5.00000000000000019e-26

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2}} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{2}} + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x \]

      5. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{-1}{2}\right)} + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot z\right)} + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{-1}{2} \cdot z, \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{-1}{2}}, \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{-1}{2}}, \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right) \]

      10. lower-*.f64 88.2

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, 0.125 \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -5.00000000000000019e-26 < (*.f64 y z) < 0.0100000000000000002

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + t} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 94.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)} \]

   if 0.0100000000000000002 < (*.f64 y z)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t - \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto t + \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2}} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + t} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{2}} + t \]

      5. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{-1}{2}\right)} + t \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot z\right)} + t \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{-1}{2} \cdot z, t\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{-1}{2}}, t\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 93.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{z \cdot -0.5}, t\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, t\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, x \cdot 0.125\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot z \leq 0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 88.5% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, t\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+28}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot z \leq 0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma y (* z -0.5) t)))
   (if (<= (* y z) -1e+28) t_1 (if (<= (* y z) 0.01) (fma 0.125 x t) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = fma(y, (z * -0.5), t);
	double tmp;
	if ((y * z) <= -1e+28) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((y * z) <= 0.01) {
		tmp = fma(0.125, x, t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = fma(y, Float64(z * -0.5), t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * z) <= -1e+28)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(y * z) <= 0.01)
		tmp = fma(0.125, x, t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(y * N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], -1e+28], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], 0.01], N[(0.125 * x + t), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y z) < -9.99999999999999958e27 or 0.0100000000000000002 < (*.f64 y z)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t - \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto t + \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2}} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + t} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{2}} + t \]

      5. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{-1}{2}\right)} + t \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot z\right)} + t \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{-1}{2} \cdot z, t\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{-1}{2}}, t\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 88.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{z \cdot -0.5}, t\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, t\right)} \]

   if -9.99999999999999958e27 < (*.f64 y z) < 0.0100000000000000002

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + t} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 91.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+185}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot z \leq 10^{+90}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* y (* z -0.5))))
   (if (<= (* y z) -2e+185) t_1 (if (<= (* y z) 1e+90) (fma 0.125 x t) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = y * (z * -0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((y * z) <= -2e+185) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((y * z) <= 1e+90) {
		tmp = fma(0.125, x, t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(y * Float64(z * -0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * z) <= -2e+185)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(y * z) <= 1e+90)
		tmp = fma(0.125, x, t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(y * N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], -2e+185], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e+90], N[(0.125 * x + t), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y z) < -2e185 or 9.99999999999999966e89 < (*.f64 y z)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{2}} \]

      2. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{-1}{2}\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \frac{-1}{2}\right)} \]

      6. lower-*.f64 85.8

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -0.5\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)} \]

   if -2e185 < (*.f64 y z) < 9.99999999999999966e89

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + t} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 85.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 64.2% accurate, 5.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma 0.125 x t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(0.125, x, t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(0.125, x, t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(0.125 * x + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + t} \]

   2. lower-fma.f64 63.6

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 63.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 32.4% accurate, 6.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.125 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* x 0.125))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * 0.125;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x * 0.125d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * 0.125;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x * 0.125

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x * 0.125)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x * 0.125;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * 0.125), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{8} \cdot x} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 34.1

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x} \]

5. Applied rewrites 34.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x} \]

6. Final simplification 34.1%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.125 \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{8} + t\right) - \frac{z}{2} \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (+ (/ x 8.0) t) (* (/ z 2.0) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x / 8.0d0) + t) - ((z / 2.0d0) * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 8.0) + t) - Float64(Float64(z / 2.0) * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(z / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024216 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- (+ (/ x 8) t) (* (/ z 2) y)))

  (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))