Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G

Percentage Accurate: 85.2% → 98.5%

Time: 10.7s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 9.7×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = 7.038928213154217e-211
  2. y = 2.4341224770390072e+36
  3. z = -4.242447958276636e-81

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 85.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))))
   (if (<= y -1.2e+44) t_0 (if (<= y 2.9e-9) (+ x (/ 1.0 y)) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.2e+44) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 2.9e-9) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    if (y <= (-1.2d+44)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= 2.9d-9) then
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.2e+44) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 2.9e-9) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.2e+44:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= 2.9e-9:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.2e+44)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 2.9e-9)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.2e+44)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 2.9e-9)
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.2e+44], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 2.9e-9], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.20000000000000007e44 or 2.89999999999999991e-9 < y

   1. Initial program 84.1%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-exp.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]

      2. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. lower-neg.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -1.20000000000000007e44 < y < 2.89999999999999991e-9

   1. Initial program 82.1%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

      3. lower-/.f64 99.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} + x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 86.6% accurate, 6.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, -0.16666666666666666, 0.5\right), -1\right), 1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.6e+64)
   (+ x (/ (fma z (fma z (fma z -0.16666666666666666 0.5) -1.0) 1.0) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.6e+64) {
		tmp = x + (fma(z, fma(z, fma(z, -0.16666666666666666, 0.5), -1.0), 1.0) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.6e+64)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(fma(z, fma(z, fma(z, -0.16666666666666666, 0.5), -1.0), 1.0) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.6e+64], N[(x + N[(N[(z * N[(z * N[(z * -0.16666666666666666 + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.60000000000000014e64

   1. Initial program 75.1%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-exp.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]

      2. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. lower-neg.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{-1}{6} \cdot z\right) - 1\right)}}{y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{-1}{6} \cdot z\right) - 1\right) + 1}}{y} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{-1}{6} \cdot z\right) - 1, 1\right)}}{y} \]

      3. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{-1}{6} \cdot z\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(1\right)\right)}, 1\right)}{y} \]

      4. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{-1}{6} \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{-1}, 1\right)}{y} \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{1}{2} + \frac{-1}{6} \cdot z, -1\right)}, 1\right)}{y} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{6} \cdot z + \frac{1}{2}}, -1\right), 1\right)}{y} \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{-1}{6}} + \frac{1}{2}, -1\right), 1\right)}{y} \]

      8. lower-fma.f64 87.6

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, -0.16666666666666666, 0.5\right)}, -1\right), 1\right)}{y} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 87.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, -0.16666666666666666, 0.5\right), -1\right), 1\right)}}{y} \]

   if -3.60000000000000014e64 < y

   1. Initial program 85.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

      3. lower-/.f64 90.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} + x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, -0.16666666666666666, 0.5\right), -1\right), 1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.4% accurate, 7.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.5, -1\right), 1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.8e+44) (+ x (/ (fma z (fma z 0.5 -1.0) 1.0) y)) (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.8e+44) {
		tmp = x + (fma(z, fma(z, 0.5, -1.0), 1.0) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.8e+44)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(fma(z, fma(z, 0.5, -1.0), 1.0) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.8e+44], N[(x + N[(N[(z * N[(z * 0.5 + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.8e44

   1. Initial program 75.2%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-exp.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]

      2. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. lower-neg.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot z - 1\right)}}{y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot z - 1\right) + 1}}{y} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{1}{2} \cdot z - 1, 1\right)}}{y} \]

      3. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot z + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(1\right)\right)}, 1\right)}{y} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{1}{2}} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(1\right)\right), 1\right)}{y} \]

      5. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot \frac{1}{2} + \color{blue}{-1}, 1\right)}{y} \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 76.8

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.5, -1\right)}, 1\right)}{y} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 76.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.5, -1\right), 1\right)}}{y} \]

   if -1.8e44 < y

   1. Initial program 85.7%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

      3. lower-/.f64 90.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} + x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.5, -1\right), 1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 86.1% accurate, 9.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, 1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.5e+22) (/ (fma y x 1.0) y) (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.5e+22) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, 1.0) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.5e+22)
		tmp = Float64(fma(y, x, 1.0) / y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.5e+22], N[(N[(y * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.50000000000000021e22

   1. Initial program 39.2%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

      3. lower-/.f64 40.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} + x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 40.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 + x \cdot y}{y}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 + x \cdot y}{y}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + 1}}{y} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + 1}{y} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 50.3

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, 1\right)}}{y} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, 1\right)}{y}} \]

   if -5.50000000000000021e22 < z

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

      3. lower-/.f64 94.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} + x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, 1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.7% accurate, 15.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{1}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ 1.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (1.0d0 / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (1.0 / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 83.3%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   2. lower-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   3. lower-/.f64 84.6

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} + x \]

5. Applied rewrites 84.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

6. Final simplification 84.6%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{1}{y} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 40.0% accurate, 19.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 1.0 / y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 1.0d0 / y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 1.0 / y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 1.0 / y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(1.0 / y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 1.0 / y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 83.3%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 38.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} \]

5. Applied rewrites 38.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 91.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y}{z + y} < 7.11541576 \cdot 10^{-315}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\frac{-1}{z}}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\log \left({\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315)
   (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (exp(log(pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576d-315) then
        tmp = x + (exp(((-1.0d0) / z)) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ** y))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(Math.log(Math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315:
		tmp = x + (math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.exp(math.log(math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y / Float64(z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-1.0 / z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(log((Float64(y / Float64(y + z)) ^ y))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ^ y))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Less[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 7.11541576e-315], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(-1.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[Log[N[Power[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024214 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 17788539399477/2500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1 z)) y)) (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

  (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))