Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, D

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%
Time: 9.2s
Alternatives: 5
Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481)) x)))))
double code(double x) {
	return x - ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + ((0.99229 + (x * 0.04481)) * x)));
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x - ((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + ((0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0)) * x)))
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return x - ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + ((0.99229 + (x * 0.04481)) * x)));
}
def code(x):
	return x - ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + ((0.99229 + (x * 0.04481)) * x)))
function code(x)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481)) * x))))
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = x - ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + ((0.99229 + (x * 0.04481)) * x)));
end
code[x_] := N[(x - N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 5 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481)) x)))))
double code(double x) {
	return x - ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + ((0.99229 + (x * 0.04481)) * x)));
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x - ((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + ((0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0)) * x)))
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return x - ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + ((0.99229 + (x * 0.04481)) * x)));
}
def code(x):
	return x - ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + ((0.99229 + (x * 0.04481)) * x)))
function code(x)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481)) * x))))
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = x - ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + ((0.99229 + (x * 0.04481)) * x)));
end
code[x_] := N[(x - N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (fma x 0.27061 2.30753) (fma x (fma x 0.04481 0.99229) 1.0))))
double code(double x) {
	return x - (fma(x, 0.27061, 2.30753) / fma(x, fma(x, 0.04481, 0.99229), 1.0));
}
function code(x)
	return Float64(x - Float64(fma(x, 0.27061, 2.30753) / fma(x, fma(x, 0.04481, 0.99229), 1.0)))
end
code[x_] := N[(x - N[(N[(x * 0.27061 + 2.30753), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x * N[(x * 0.04481 + 0.99229), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lift-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
    2. lift-+.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
    3. lift-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}}\right) \cdot x} \]
    4. lift-+.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} \cdot x} \]
    5. lift-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x}} \]
    6. lift-+.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x}} \]
    7. lift-/.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x}} \]
    8. lift--.f64100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x}} \]
    9. lift-+.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
    10. +-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000} + \frac{230753}{100000}}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
    11. lift-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}} + \frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
    12. lower-fma.f64100.0

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x} \]
    13. lift-+.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x}} \]
    14. +-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x + 1}} \]
    15. lift-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} + 1} \]
    16. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + 1} \]
    17. lower-fma.f64100.0

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, 1\right)}} \]
    18. lift-+.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}}, 1\right)} \]
    19. +-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000} + \frac{99229}{100000}}, 1\right)} \]
    20. lift-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}} + \frac{99229}{100000}, 1\right)} \]
    21. lower-fma.f64100.0

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right)}, 1\right)} \]
  4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)}} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{-1 - x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -10:\\ \;\;\;\;x - 0.2727126142559131\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_0 \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-2.30753\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - 0.2727126142559131\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (+
          x
          (/
           (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061))
           (- -1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))))))
   (if (<= t_0 -10.0)
     (- x 0.2727126142559131)
     (if (<= t_0 -1.0) -2.30753 (- x 0.2727126142559131)))))
double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = x + ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (-1.0 - (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481)))));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -10.0) {
		tmp = x - 0.2727126142559131;
	} else if (t_0 <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -2.30753;
	} else {
		tmp = x - 0.2727126142559131;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = x + ((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / ((-1.0d0) - (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0)))))
    if (t_0 <= (-10.0d0)) then
        tmp = x - 0.2727126142559131d0
    else if (t_0 <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = -2.30753d0
    else
        tmp = x - 0.2727126142559131d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = x + ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (-1.0 - (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481)))));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -10.0) {
		tmp = x - 0.2727126142559131;
	} else if (t_0 <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -2.30753;
	} else {
		tmp = x - 0.2727126142559131;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x):
	t_0 = x + ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (-1.0 - (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481)))))
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= -10.0:
		tmp = x - 0.2727126142559131
	elif t_0 <= -1.0:
		tmp = -2.30753
	else:
		tmp = x - 0.2727126142559131
	return tmp
function code(x)
	t_0 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(-1.0 - Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= -10.0)
		tmp = Float64(x - 0.2727126142559131);
	elseif (t_0 <= -1.0)
		tmp = -2.30753;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - 0.2727126142559131);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x)
	t_0 = x + ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (-1.0 - (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481)))));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= -10.0)
		tmp = x - 0.2727126142559131;
	elseif (t_0 <= -1.0)
		tmp = -2.30753;
	else
		tmp = x - 0.2727126142559131;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x + N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(-1.0 - N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, -10.0], N[(x - 0.2727126142559131), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$0, -1.0], -2.30753, N[(x - 0.2727126142559131), $MachinePrecision]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := x + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{-1 - x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)}\\
\mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -10:\\
\;\;\;\;x - 0.2727126142559131\\

\mathbf{elif}\;t\_0 \leq -1:\\
\;\;\;\;-2.30753\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x - 0.2727126142559131\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 x (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 230753/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 27061/100000 binary64))) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 99229/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 4481/100000 binary64))) x)))) < -10 or -1 < (-.f64 x (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 230753/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 27061/100000 binary64))) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 99229/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 4481/100000 binary64))) x))))

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
      2. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
      3. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}}\right) \cdot x} \]
      4. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} \cdot x} \]
      5. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x}} \]
      6. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x}} \]
      7. lift-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x}} \]
      8. lift--.f64100.0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x}} \]
      9. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
      10. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000} + \frac{230753}{100000}}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
      11. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}} + \frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
      12. lower-fma.f64100.0

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x} \]
      13. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x}} \]
      14. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x + 1}} \]
      15. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} + 1} \]
      16. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + 1} \]
      17. lower-fma.f64100.0

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, 1\right)}} \]
      18. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}}, 1\right)} \]
      19. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000} + \frac{99229}{100000}}, 1\right)} \]
      20. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}} + \frac{99229}{100000}, 1\right)} \]
      21. lower-fma.f64100.0

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right)}, 1\right)} \]
    4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)}} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{1 + \frac{99229}{100000} \cdot x}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot x + 1}} \]
      2. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{99229}{100000}} + 1} \]
      3. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot 1\right)} + 1} \]
      4. lft-mult-inverseN/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{x} \cdot x\right)}\right) + 1} \]
      5. associate-*l*N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot \frac{1}{x}\right) \cdot x\right)} + 1} \]
      6. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot \frac{1}{x}\right) \cdot x, 1\right)}} \]
      7. associate-*l*N/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{x} \cdot x\right)}, 1\right)} \]
      8. lft-mult-inverseN/A

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{99229}{100000} \cdot \color{blue}{1}, 1\right)} \]
      9. metadata-eval98.1

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{0.99229}, 1\right)} \]
    7. Simplified98.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229, 1\right)}} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{27061}{99229}} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Simplified98.1%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{0.2727126142559131} \]

      if -10 < (-.f64 x (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 230753/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 27061/100000 binary64))) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 99229/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 4481/100000 binary64))) x)))) < -1

      1. Initial program 99.9%

        \[x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-230753}{100000}} \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Simplified97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2.30753} \]
      5. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
      6. Final simplification97.5%

        \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{-1 - x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \leq -10:\\ \;\;\;\;x - 0.2727126142559131\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{-1 - x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-2.30753\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - 0.2727126142559131\\ \end{array} \]
      7. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 3: 98.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229, 1\right)} \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (x)
       :precision binary64
       (- x (/ (fma x 0.27061 2.30753) (fma x 0.99229 1.0))))
      double code(double x) {
      	return x - (fma(x, 0.27061, 2.30753) / fma(x, 0.99229, 1.0));
      }
      
      function code(x)
      	return Float64(x - Float64(fma(x, 0.27061, 2.30753) / fma(x, 0.99229, 1.0)))
      end
      
      code[x_] := N[(x - N[(N[(x * 0.27061 + 2.30753), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x * 0.99229 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229, 1\right)}
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Initial program 100.0%

        \[x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Step-by-step derivation
        1. lift-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
        2. lift-+.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
        3. lift-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}}\right) \cdot x} \]
        4. lift-+.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} \cdot x} \]
        5. lift-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x}} \]
        6. lift-+.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x}} \]
        7. lift-/.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x}} \]
        8. lift--.f64100.0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x}} \]
        9. lift-+.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
        10. +-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000} + \frac{230753}{100000}}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
        11. lift-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}} + \frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} \]
        12. lower-fma.f64100.0

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x} \]
        13. lift-+.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x}} \]
        14. +-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x + 1}} \]
        15. lift-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} + 1} \]
        16. *-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + 1} \]
        17. lower-fma.f64100.0

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, 1\right)}} \]
        18. lift-+.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}}, 1\right)} \]
        19. +-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000} + \frac{99229}{100000}}, 1\right)} \]
        20. lift-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}} + \frac{99229}{100000}, 1\right)} \]
        21. lower-fma.f64100.0

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right)}, 1\right)} \]
      4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)}} \]
      5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{1 + \frac{99229}{100000} \cdot x}} \]
      6. Step-by-step derivation
        1. +-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot x + 1}} \]
        2. *-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{99229}{100000}} + 1} \]
        3. metadata-evalN/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot 1\right)} + 1} \]
        4. lft-mult-inverseN/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{x} \cdot x\right)}\right) + 1} \]
        5. associate-*l*N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot \frac{1}{x}\right) \cdot x\right)} + 1} \]
        6. lower-fma.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot \frac{1}{x}\right) \cdot x, 1\right)}} \]
        7. associate-*l*N/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{x} \cdot x\right)}, 1\right)} \]
        8. lft-mult-inverseN/A

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{27061}{100000}, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{99229}{100000} \cdot \color{blue}{1}, 1\right)} \]
        9. metadata-eval98.5

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{0.99229}, 1\right)} \]
      7. Simplified98.5%

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229, 1\right)}} \]
      8. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 4: 97.7% accurate, 9.8× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - 2.30753 \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (- x 2.30753))
      double code(double x) {
      	return x - 2.30753;
      }
      
      real(8) function code(x)
          real(8), intent (in) :: x
          code = x - 2.30753d0
      end function
      
      public static double code(double x) {
      	return x - 2.30753;
      }
      
      def code(x):
      	return x - 2.30753
      
      function code(x)
      	return Float64(x - 2.30753)
      end
      
      function tmp = code(x)
      	tmp = x - 2.30753;
      end
      
      code[x_] := N[(x - 2.30753), $MachinePrecision]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      x - 2.30753
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Initial program 100.0%

        \[x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000}} \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Simplified97.5%

          \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{2.30753} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 5: 50.4% accurate, 39.0× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ -2.30753 \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (x) :precision binary64 -2.30753)
        double code(double x) {
        	return -2.30753;
        }
        
        real(8) function code(x)
            real(8), intent (in) :: x
            code = -2.30753d0
        end function
        
        public static double code(double x) {
        	return -2.30753;
        }
        
        def code(x):
        	return -2.30753
        
        function code(x)
        	return -2.30753
        end
        
        function tmp = code(x)
        	tmp = -2.30753;
        end
        
        code[x_] := -2.30753
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        -2.30753
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 100.0%

          \[x - \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) \cdot x} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-230753}{100000}} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Simplified50.3%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2.30753} \]
          2. Add Preprocessing

          Reproduce

          ?
          herbie shell --seed 2024207 
          (FPCore (x)
            :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, D"
            :precision binary64
            (- x (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481)) x)))))