Main:bigenough2 from A

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.7s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (x + z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (x + z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(x + z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (x + z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 61.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+202}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -4e-32)
   (* y z)
   (if (<= y 1.0) x (if (<= y 1.4e+202) (* x y) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4e-32) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 1.4e+202) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-4d-32)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (y <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 1.4d+202) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = y * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4e-32) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 1.4e+202) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -4e-32:
		tmp = y * z
	elif y <= 1.0:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 1.4e+202:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = y * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -4e-32)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (y <= 1.0)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 1.4e+202)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -4e-32)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (y <= 1.0)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 1.4e+202)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = y * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -4e-32], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.0], x, If[LessEqual[y, 1.4e+202], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -4.00000000000000022e-32 or 1.40000000000000008e202 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 62.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Simplified 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -4.00000000000000022e-32 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 74.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1 < y < 1.40000000000000008e202

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 66.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 66.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

      2. *-lowering-*.f64 64.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   8. Simplified 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+202}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (+ x z))))
   (if (<= y -1.0) t_0 (if (<= y 1.0) (fma z y x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (x + z);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 1.0) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(x + z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 1.0)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 1.0], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1 or 1 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

      3. +-lowering-+.f64 98.3

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   if -1 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 97.9

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 97.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 86.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-43}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{-127}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.4e-43)
   (fma z y x)
   (if (<= z 1.55e-127) (fma y x x) (fma z y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.4e-43) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else if (z <= 1.55e-127) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.4e-43)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	elseif (z <= 1.55e-127)
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.4e-43], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.55e-127], N[(y * x + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.3999999999999999e-43 or 1.55e-127 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 82.7

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Simplified 82.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 82.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 82.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   if -1.3999999999999999e-43 < z < 1.55e-127

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 96.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 73.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+89}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+193}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.4e+89) (* y z) (if (<= z 1.5e+193) (fma y x x) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.4e+89) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 1.5e+193) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.4e+89)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (z <= 1.5e+193)
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.4e+89], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.5e+193], N[(y * x + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.40000000000000004e89 or 1.5e193 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 78.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Simplified 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -2.40000000000000004e89 < z < 1.5e193

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 77.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 77.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 61.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -2.5e-13) (* x y) (if (<= y 1.0) x (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.5e-13) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-2.5d-13)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (y <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.5e-13) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -2.5e-13:
		tmp = x * y
	elif y <= 1.0:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.5e-13)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (y <= 1.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -2.5e-13)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (y <= 1.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -2.5e-13], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.0], x, N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.49999999999999995e-13 or 1 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 54.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 54.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

      2. *-lowering-*.f64 52.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   8. Simplified 52.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -2.49999999999999995e-13 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 36.8% accurate, 12.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Simplified 37.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024204 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Main:bigenough2 from A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (+ z x))))