SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.5s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.2×

• 21.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z - x, y, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (- z x) y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((z - x), y, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(z - x), y, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] * y + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right) + x} \]

   2. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} + x \]

   3. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - x, y, x\right)} \]

   4. --lowering--.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z - x}, y, x\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - x, y, x\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(z - x\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- z x) y)))
   (if (<= y -1.0) t_0 (if (<= y 1.0) (fma z y x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z - x) * y;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 1.0) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(z - x) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 1.0)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 1.0], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1 or 1 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

      2. --lowering--.f64 98.3

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   if -1 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 97.9

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 97.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z - x\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z - x\right) \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 60.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.08 \cdot 10^{-86}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -2.2e-28) (* z y) (if (<= y 1.08e-86) x (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.2e-28) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (y <= 1.08e-86) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-2.2d-28)) then
        tmp = z * y
    else if (y <= 1.08d-86) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = z * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.2e-28) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (y <= 1.08e-86) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -2.2e-28:
		tmp = z * y
	elif y <= 1.08e-86:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = z * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.2e-28)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (y <= 1.08e-86)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -2.2e-28)
		tmp = z * y;
	elseif (y <= 1.08e-86)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = z * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -2.2e-28], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.08e-86], x, N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.19999999999999996e-28 or 1.07999999999999993e-86 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 50.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Simplified 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -2.19999999999999996e-28 < y < 1.07999999999999993e-86

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 80.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.08 \cdot 10^{-86}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 75.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 31000:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 31000.0) (fma z y x) (- (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 31000.0) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = -(x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 31000.0)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 31000.0], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], (-N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision])]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 31000

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 86.9

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Simplified 86.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 86.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 86.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   if 31000 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

      2. --lowering--.f64 98.7

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)} \]

      2. neg-lowering-neg.f64 62.1

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 62.1%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 31000:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 76.0% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma z y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(z, y, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(z, y, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-lowering-*.f64 73.4

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

5. Simplified 73.4%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   2. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

   3. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 73.4

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 73.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 36.8% accurate, 12.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Simplified 37.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024204 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (- z x))))