Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 7.4s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.3×

• 29.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right), y, t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma (fma x y z) y t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(fma(x, y, z), y, t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(fma(x, y, z), y, t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y + z), $MachinePrecision] * y + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot y + z, y, t\right)} \]

   2. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 99.9

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right)}, y, t\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right), y, t\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 90.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)\\ t_2 := y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+89}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* y (+ z (* x y)))) (t_2 (* y (fma y x z))))
   (if (<= t_1 -1e+89) t_2 (if (<= t_1 1e+101) (fma y z t) t_2))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = y * (z + (x * y));
	double t_2 = y * fma(y, x, z);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -1e+89) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+101) {
		tmp = fma(y, z, t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(x * y)))
	t_2 = Float64(y * fma(y, x, z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -1e+89)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+101)
		tmp = fma(y, z, t);
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(y * N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(y * N[(y * x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -1e+89], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+101], N[(y * z + t), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) z) y) < -9.99999999999999995e88 or 9.9999999999999998e100 < (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) z) y)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot \left(x + \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]

   if -9.99999999999999995e88 < (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) z) y) < 9.9999999999999998e100

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + t} \]

      2. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 91.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, t\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, t\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right) \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+89}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right) \leq 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 79.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+96}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* y (* x y))))
   (if (<= y -7.8e+27) t_1 (if (<= y 6.2e+96) (fma y z t) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = y * (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -7.8e+27) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 6.2e+96) {
		tmp = fma(y, z, t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(y * Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -7.8e+27)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 6.2e+96)
		tmp = fma(y, z, t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(y * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -7.8e+27], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 6.2e+96], N[(y * z + t), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -7.7999999999999997e27 or 6.1999999999999996e96 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot {y}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

      4. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \]

      6. *-lowering-*.f64 79.1

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(y \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -7.7999999999999997e27 < y < 6.1999999999999996e96

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + t} \]

      2. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 85.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, t\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, t\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+96}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 52.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9.4 \cdot 10^{+48}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+115}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -9.4e+48) (* y z) (if (<= z 4.8e+115) t (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -9.4e+48) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 4.8e+115) {
		tmp = t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-9.4d+48)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (z <= 4.8d+115) then
        tmp = t
    else
        tmp = y * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -9.4e+48) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 4.8e+115) {
		tmp = t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -9.4e+48:
		tmp = y * z
	elif z <= 4.8e+115:
		tmp = t
	else:
		tmp = y * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -9.4e+48)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (z <= 4.8e+115)
		tmp = t;
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -9.4e+48)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (z <= 4.8e+115)
		tmp = t;
	else
		tmp = y * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -9.4e+48], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 4.8e+115], t, N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -9.40000000000000025e48 or 4.8000000000000001e115 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 57.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Simplified 57.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -9.40000000000000025e48 < z < 4.8000000000000001e115

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 49.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 66.8% accurate, 2.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma y z t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y, z, t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(y, z, t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * z + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + t} \]

   2. accelerator-lowering-fma.f64 66.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, t\right)} \]

5. Simplified 66.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, t\right)} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 38.1% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Simplified 39.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024204 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))