Diagrams.ThreeD.Transform:aboutY from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 8.5s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (z * Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (z * math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (z * Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (z * math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (z * Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (z * math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 86.6% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+60} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+69}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \sin y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4e+60) (not (<= x 9e+69))) (* x (cos y)) (+ x (* z (sin y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4e+60) || !(x <= 9e+69)) {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * sin(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4d+60)) .or. (.not. (x <= 9d+69))) then
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = x + (z * sin(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4e+60) || !(x <= 9e+69)) {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * Math.sin(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4e+60) or not (x <= 9e+69):
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * math.sin(y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4e+60) || !(x <= 9e+69))
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * sin(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4e+60) || ~((x <= 9e+69)))
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = x + (z * sin(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4e+60], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 9e+69]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.9999999999999998e60 or 8.9999999999999999e69 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -3.9999999999999998e60 < x < 8.9999999999999999e69

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + z \cdot \sin y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+60} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+69}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \sin y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 74.9% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-38} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \sin y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.12e-38) (not (<= x 1.9e-85))) (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.12e-38) || !(x <= 1.9e-85)) {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * sin(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.12d-38)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.9d-85))) then
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = z * sin(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.12e-38) || !(x <= 1.9e-85)) {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * Math.sin(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.12e-38) or not (x <= 1.9e-85):
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = z * math.sin(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.12e-38) || !(x <= 1.9e-85))
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * sin(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.12e-38) || ~((x <= 1.9e-85)))
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = z * sin(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.12e-38], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.9e-85]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.1200000000000001e-38 or 1.8999999999999999e-85 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -1.1200000000000001e-38 < x < 1.8999999999999999e-85

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \sin y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-38} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \sin y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.35e-7) (not (<= y 3e-18))) (* x (cos y)) (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.35e-7) || !(y <= 3e-18)) {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.35d-7)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3d-18))) then
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.35e-7) || !(y <= 3e-18)) {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.35e-7) or not (y <= 3e-18):
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.35e-7) || !(y <= 3e-18))
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.35e-7) || ~((y <= 3e-18)))
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.35e-7], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3e-18]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.35000000000000004e-7 or 2.99999999999999983e-18 < y

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 55.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -1.35000000000000004e-7 < y < 2.99999999999999983e-18

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 41.2% accurate, 15.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-102}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.8e-102) x (if (<= x 3.2e-90) (* y z) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.8e-102) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 3.2e-90) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.8d-102)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 3.2d-90) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.8e-102) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 3.2e-90) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.8e-102:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 3.2e-90:
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.8e-102)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 3.2e-90)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.8e-102)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 3.2e-90)
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.8e-102], x, If[LessEqual[x, 3.2e-90], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.8e-102 or 3.20000000000000007e-90 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 49.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 34.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 45.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.8e-102 < x < 3.20000000000000007e-90

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \sin y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 42.6%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 44.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-102}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 52.4% accurate, 41.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 50.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 38.8% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 50.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 41.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 33.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024191 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Transform:aboutY from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))