Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 58.2% → 99.9%

Time: 16.4s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 1.6×

• 30.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 58.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (fma
     (cos (* phi1 0.5))
     (cos (* 0.5 phi2))
     (* (sin (* phi1 0.5)) (- (sin (* 0.5 phi2))))))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos((phi1 * 0.5)), cos((0.5 * phi2)), (sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * -sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)), cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)), Float64(sin(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * Float64(-sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2)))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Sin[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * (-N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cube-cbrt 89.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. pow3 89.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right)}^{3}}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 89.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right)}^{3}}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. rem-cube-cbrt 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\phi_1 + \phi_2}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. div-inv 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. *-commutative 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. distribute-rgt-in 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. cos-sum 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

8. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) + \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

10. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

11. Final simplification 99.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 95.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 10^{+104}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 1e+104)
   (*
    R
    (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (*
    R
    (hypot
     (*
      lambda2
      (-
       (* (sin (* phi1 0.5)) (sin (* 0.5 phi2)))
       (* (cos (* 0.5 phi2)) (cos (* phi1 0.5)))))
     (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 1e+104) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda2 * ((sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))) - (cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 1e+104) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda2 * ((Math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi2))) - (Math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 1e+104:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda2 * ((math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi2))) - (math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 1e+104)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda2 * Float64(Float64(sin(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2))) - Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 1e+104)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda2 * ((sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))) - (cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, 1e+104], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda2 * N[(N[(N[Sin[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 1e104

   1. Initial program 63.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 1e104 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 56.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 82.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 77.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. pow3 81.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right)}^{3}}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 81.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right)}^{3}}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. rem-cube-cbrt 82.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\phi_1 + \phi_2}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. div-inv 82.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 82.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 82.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-in 82.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      6. cos-sum 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 94.7%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       2. *-commutative 94.7%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 94.7%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       4. *-commutative 94.7%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       5. *-commutative 94.7%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \color{blue}{\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   11. Simplified 94.7%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 10^{+104}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+188}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda1 -5e+188)
   (*
    R
    (hypot
     (*
      lambda1
      (-
       (* (cos (* 0.5 phi2)) (cos (* phi1 0.5)))
       (* (sin (* phi1 0.5)) (sin (* 0.5 phi2)))))
     (- phi1 phi2)))
   (*
    R
    (hypot
     (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))
     (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -5e+188) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * ((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))) - (sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -5e+188) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * ((Math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))) - (Math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -5e+188:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * ((math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))) - (math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -5e+188)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5))) - Float64(sin(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -5e+188)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * ((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))) - (sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda1, -5e+188], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -5.0000000000000001e188

   1. Initial program 35.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 88.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 68.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. pow3 67.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right)}^{3}}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 67.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right)}^{3}}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. rem-cube-cbrt 88.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\phi_1 + \phi_2}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. div-inv 88.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 88.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 88.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-in 88.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      6. cos-sum 100.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 90.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1} \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -5.0000000000000001e188 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 66.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+188}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (-
     (* (cos (* 0.5 phi2)) (cos (* phi1 0.5)))
     (* (sin (* phi1 0.5)) (sin (* 0.5 phi2)))))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))) - (sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((Math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))) - (Math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))) - (math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5))) - Float64(sin(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))) - (sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cube-cbrt 89.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. pow3 89.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right)}^{3}}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 89.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right)}^{3}}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. rem-cube-cbrt 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\phi_1 + \phi_2}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. div-inv 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. *-commutative 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. distribute-rgt-in 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. cos-sum 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

8. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

9. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 93.0% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -3.8e-7)
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* phi1 0.5))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi2))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -3.8e-7) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -3.8e-7) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -3.8e-7:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -3.8e-7)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -3.8e-7)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -3.8e-7], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -3.80000000000000015e-7

   1. Initial program 54.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 90.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 90.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -3.80000000000000015e-7 < phi1

   1. Initial program 65.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 95.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 95.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 95.8% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 90.4% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* phi1 0.5))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 91.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 91.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Simplified 91.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

8. Final simplification 91.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 34.1% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 6.5e+91)
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))
   (* lambda2 (* R (cos (* 0.5 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 6.5e+91) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = lambda2 * (R * cos((0.5 * phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda2 <= 6.5d+91) then
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    else
        tmp = lambda2 * (r * cos((0.5d0 * phi2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 6.5e+91) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = lambda2 * (R * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 6.5e+91:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = lambda2 * (R * math.cos((0.5 * phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 6.5e+91)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(lambda2 * Float64(R * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 6.5e+91)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = lambda2 * (R * cos((0.5 * phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, 6.5e+91], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(lambda2 * N[(R * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 6.4999999999999997e91

   1. Initial program 63.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 24.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 24.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 24.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 24.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 27.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 27.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 27.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 27.1%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if 6.4999999999999997e91 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 59.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 84.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around -inf 20.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 20.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 20.0%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 20.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 12.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{-\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot \sqrt{-\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}} \]

      2. sqrt-unprod 25.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 25.0%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}} \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 18.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}} \]

      5. add-sqr-sqrt 49.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 49.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \]

      7. *-commutative 49.7%

         \[\leadsto \cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \]

      8. associate-*r* 49.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot R\right) \cdot \lambda_2} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 49.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot -0.5\right) \cdot R\right) \cdot \lambda_2} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 55.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot \lambda_2 \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 55.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot R\right)} \cdot \lambda_2 \]

   12. Simplified 55.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot R\right)} \cdot \lambda_2 \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 31.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 34.1% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 5.6e+91)
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))
   (* (cos (* 0.5 phi2)) (* R lambda2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 5.6e+91) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = cos((0.5 * phi2)) * (R * lambda2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda2 <= 5.6d+91) then
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    else
        tmp = cos((0.5d0 * phi2)) * (r * lambda2)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 5.6e+91) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * (R * lambda2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 5.6e+91:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * (R * lambda2)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 5.6e+91)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * Float64(R * lambda2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 5.6e+91)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = cos((0.5 * phi2)) * (R * lambda2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, 5.6e+91], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(R * lambda2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 5.5999999999999997e91

   1. Initial program 63.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 24.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 24.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 24.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 24.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 27.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 27.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 27.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 27.1%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if 5.5999999999999997e91 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 59.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 84.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around -inf 20.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 20.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 20.0%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 20.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 12.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{-\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot \sqrt{-\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}} \]

      2. sqrt-unprod 25.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 25.0%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}} \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 18.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}} \]

      5. add-sqr-sqrt 49.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 49.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \]

      7. *-commutative 49.7%

         \[\leadsto \cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \]

      8. associate-*r* 49.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot R\right) \cdot \lambda_2} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 49.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot -0.5\right) \cdot R\right) \cdot \lambda_2} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 55.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 55.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)} \]

   12. Simplified 55.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 31.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 30.1% accurate, 20.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 - \lambda_2 \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+256}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \left(\frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} + -1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (- lambda1 lambda2) -9.5e+256)
   (* phi1 (* R (+ (/ phi2 phi1) -1.0)))
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if ((lambda1 - lambda2) <= -9.5e+256) {
		tmp = phi1 * (R * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((lambda1 - lambda2) <= (-9.5d+256)) then
        tmp = phi1 * (r * ((phi2 / phi1) + (-1.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if ((lambda1 - lambda2) <= -9.5e+256) {
		tmp = phi1 * (R * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if (lambda1 - lambda2) <= -9.5e+256:
		tmp = phi1 * (R * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0))
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) <= -9.5e+256)
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(R * Float64(Float64(phi2 / phi1) + -1.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((lambda1 - lambda2) <= -9.5e+256)
		tmp = phi1 * (R * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision], -9.5e+256], N[(phi1 * N[(R * N[(N[(phi2 / phi1), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 lambda1 lambda2) < -9.49999999999999995e256

   1. Initial program 54.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 82.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 82.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 7.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 7.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 7.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 7.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around inf 12.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot R + \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 12.7%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-R\right)} + \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 12.7%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1} + \left(-R\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 7.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}} + \left(-R\right)\right) \]

      4. neg-mul-1 7.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot R}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 7.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} + \color{blue}{R \cdot -1}\right) \]

      6. distribute-lft-out 7.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \left(\frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} + -1\right)\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 7.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \left(\frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} + -1\right)\right)} \]

   if -9.49999999999999995e256 < (-.f64 lambda1 lambda2)

   1. Initial program 63.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 24.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 24.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 24.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 24.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 27.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 27.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 27.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 27.6%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 29.8% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+151}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= R 5e+151)
   (- (* R phi2) (* R phi1))
   (* phi2 (- R (* R (/ phi1 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 5e+151) {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (r <= 5d+151) then
        tmp = (r * phi2) - (r * phi1)
    else
        tmp = phi2 * (r - (r * (phi1 / phi2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 5e+151) {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if R <= 5e+151:
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1)
	else:
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (R <= 5e+151)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(R * phi2) - Float64(R * phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(phi2 * Float64(R - Float64(R * Float64(phi1 / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (R <= 5e+151)
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	else
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[R, 5e+151], N[(N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision] - N[(R * phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(phi2 * N[(R - N[(R * N[(phi1 / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if R < 5.0000000000000002e151

   1. Initial program 57.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 94.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 22.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 22.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 22.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 22.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 24.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 24.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 24.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 24.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      4. *-commutative 24.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} - R \cdot \phi_1 \]

      5. *-commutative 24.9%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R - \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   10. Simplified 24.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R - \phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   if 5.0000000000000002e151 < R

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 31.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 31.1%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 31.1%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 37.7%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 37.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 26.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+151}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 28.7% accurate, 36.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.08 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -1.08e+40) (* phi1 (- R)) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.08e+40) {
		tmp = phi1 * -R;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi1 <= (-1.08d+40)) then
        tmp = phi1 * -r
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.08e+40) {
		tmp = phi1 * -R;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -1.08e+40:
		tmp = phi1 * -R
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -1.08e+40)
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(-R));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -1.08e+40)
		tmp = phi1 * -R;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -1.08e+40], N[(phi1 * (-R)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -1.08000000000000001e40

   1. Initial program 50.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 92.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 59.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 59.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 59.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 59.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)} \]

   if -1.08000000000000001e40 < phi1

   1. Initial program 65.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 19.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 27.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.08 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 30.0% accurate, 65.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R (- phi2 phi1)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * (phi2 - phi1);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * (phi2 - phi1)
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * (phi2 - phi1);
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * (phi2 - phi1)

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 23.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 23.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   2. unsub-neg 23.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

7. Simplified 23.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 26.1%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 26.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

   2. sub-neg 26.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

10. Simplified 26.1%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 17.7% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \phi_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R phi2))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * phi2
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * phi2

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * phi2)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * phi2;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.7%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 95.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 18.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024191 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))