Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5

Percentage Accurate: 70.2% → 95.3%
Time: 14.4s
Alternatives: 11
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 11 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 70.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 95.3% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -40000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -40000000000000.0)
   (* 2.0 (pow (exp (* 0.25 (- (log (- y)) (log (/ -1.0 x))))) 2.0))
   (if (<= y 7.6e-268)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x)))))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -40000000000000.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 * pow(exp((0.25 * (log(-y) - log((-1.0 / x))))), 2.0);
	} else if (y <= 7.6e-268) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-40000000000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (exp((0.25d0 * (log(-y) - log(((-1.0d0) / x))))) ** 2.0d0)
    else if (y <= 7.6d-268) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -40000000000000.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.pow(Math.exp((0.25 * (Math.log(-y) - Math.log((-1.0 / x))))), 2.0);
	} else if (y <= 7.6e-268) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt((y + x)) * Math.sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -40000000000000.0:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.pow(math.exp((0.25 * (math.log(-y) - math.log((-1.0 / x))))), 2.0)
	elif y <= 7.6e-268:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt((y + x)) * math.sqrt(z))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -40000000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * (exp(Float64(0.25 * Float64(log(Float64(-y)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / x))))) ^ 2.0));
	elseif (y <= 7.6e-268)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -40000000000000.0)
		tmp = 2.0 * (exp((0.25 * (log(-y) - log((-1.0 / x))))) ^ 2.0);
	elseif (y <= 7.6e-268)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -40000000000000.0], N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[Exp[N[(0.25 * N[(N[Log[(-y)], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 7.6e-268], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -40000000000000:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < -4e13

    1. Initial program 50.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative50.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 31.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. add-sqr-sqrt30.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y}}\right)} \]
      2. pow230.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y}}\right)}^{2}} \]
      3. pow1/231.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot y\right)}^{0.5}}}\right)}^{2} \]
      4. sqrt-pow131.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(x \cdot y\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]
      5. *-commutative31.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)}}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      6. metadata-eval31.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(y \cdot x\right)}^{\color{blue}{0.25}}\right)}^{2} \]
    7. Applied egg-rr31.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(y \cdot x\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 46.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]

    if -4e13 < y < 7.6000000000000005e-268

    1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative85.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 7.6000000000000005e-268 < y

    1. Initial program 70.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqrt-prod56.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{x + y}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative56.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative56.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{y + x}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
    7. Applied egg-rr56.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification61.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -40000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 85.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{-225}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{y}{z}} \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+141}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{\left|y + x\right|}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -9.2e-225)
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ 1.0 (/ y z))) (sqrt (* x z))))
   (if (<= z 1.65e+141)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x z (* y (+ x z)))))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt (fabs (+ y x))))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -9.2e-225) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((1.0 + (y / z))) * sqrt((x * z)));
	} else if (z <= 1.65e+141) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, (y * (x + z))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(fabs((y + x))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -9.2e-225)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(1.0 + Float64(y / z))) * sqrt(Float64(x * z))));
	elseif (z <= 1.65e+141)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, Float64(y * Float64(x + z)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(abs(Float64(y + x)))));
	end
	return tmp
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -9.2e-225], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(1.0 + N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.65e+141], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * z + N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[Abs[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{-225}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{y}{z}} \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z}\right)\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+141}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{\left|y + x\right|}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if z < -9.1999999999999995e-225

    1. Initial program 66.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-out66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]
    4. Applied egg-rr66.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 62.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right)\right)} \cdot x + y \cdot z} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 40.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right)\right)}} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*39.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right)}} \]
    8. Simplified39.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right)}} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative39.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right) \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. sqrt-prod34.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{y}{z}} \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z}\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative34.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{y}{z}} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot x}}\right) \]
    10. Applied egg-rr34.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{y}{z}} \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot x}\right)} \]

    if -9.1999999999999995e-225 < z < 1.6499999999999998e141

    1. Initial program 82.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+82.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative82.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative82.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative82.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative82.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative82.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. +-commutative82.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative82.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + z \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative82.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot z}\right)} \]
      10. associate-+l+82.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      11. +-commutative82.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. fma-define82.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      13. distribute-lft-out82.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Simplified82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 1.6499999999999998e141 < z

    1. Initial program 45.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative45.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified45.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 46.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqrt-prod99.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{x + y}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative99.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative99.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{y + x}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
    7. Applied egg-rr99.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. add-sqr-sqrt99.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
      2. sqrt-unprod52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(y + x\right) \cdot \left(y + x\right)}}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
      3. pow252.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\color{blue}{{\left(y + x\right)}^{2}}}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
      4. +-commutative52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\sqrt{{\color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}}^{2}}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
    9. Applied egg-rr52.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\sqrt{{\left(x + y\right)}^{2}}}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
    10. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow252.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)}}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
      2. rem-sqrt-square99.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left|x + y\right|}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
    11. Simplified99.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left|x + y\right|}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification64.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{-225}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{y}{z}} \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+141}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{\left|y + x\right|}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{-225}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{y}{z}} \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+162}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -9.2e-225)
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ 1.0 (/ y z))) (sqrt (* x z))))
   (if (<= z 1.4e+162)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x z (* y (+ x z)))))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -9.2e-225) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((1.0 + (y / z))) * sqrt((x * z)));
	} else if (z <= 1.4e+162) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, (y * (x + z))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -9.2e-225)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(1.0 + Float64(y / z))) * sqrt(Float64(x * z))));
	elseif (z <= 1.4e+162)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, Float64(y * Float64(x + z)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -9.2e-225], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(1.0 + N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.4e+162], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * z + N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{-225}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{y}{z}} \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z}\right)\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+162}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if z < -9.1999999999999995e-225

    1. Initial program 66.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-out66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]
    4. Applied egg-rr66.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 62.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right)\right)} \cdot x + y \cdot z} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 40.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right)\right)}} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*39.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right)}} \]
    8. Simplified39.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right)}} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative39.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right) \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. sqrt-prod34.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{y}{z}} \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z}\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative34.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{y}{z}} \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot x}}\right) \]
    10. Applied egg-rr34.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{y}{z}} \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot x}\right)} \]

    if -9.1999999999999995e-225 < z < 1.39999999999999995e162

    1. Initial program 82.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+82.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative82.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative82.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative82.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative82.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative82.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. +-commutative82.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative82.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + z \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative82.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot z}\right)} \]
      10. associate-+l+82.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      11. +-commutative82.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. fma-define82.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      13. distribute-lft-out82.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Simplified82.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 1.39999999999999995e162 < z

    1. Initial program 37.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative37.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified37.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 38.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqrt-prod99.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{x + y}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative99.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative99.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{y + x}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
    7. Applied egg-rr99.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification63.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{-225}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{1 + \frac{y}{z}} \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+162}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 7.6e-268)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x z (* y (+ x z)))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.6e-268) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, (y * (x + z))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 7.6e-268)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, Float64(y * Float64(x + z)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 7.6e-268], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * z + N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 7.6000000000000005e-268

    1. Initial program 68.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. +-commutative68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + z \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot z}\right)} \]
      10. associate-+l+68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      11. +-commutative68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. fma-define68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      13. distribute-lft-out68.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Simplified68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 7.6000000000000005e-268 < y

    1. Initial program 70.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqrt-prod56.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{x + y}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative56.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative56.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{y + x}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
    7. Applied egg-rr56.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-296}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.8e-296)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.8e-296) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.8d-296) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.8e-296) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt((y + x)) * Math.sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.8e-296:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt((y + x)) * math.sqrt(z))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.8e-296)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.8e-296)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.8e-296], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-296}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 2.7999999999999999e-296

    1. Initial program 67.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified67.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative48.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)}} \]
    7. Simplified48.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)}} \]

    if 2.7999999999999999e-296 < y

    1. Initial program 70.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 46.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqrt-prod55.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{x + y}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative55.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative55.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{y + x}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
    7. Applied egg-rr55.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification52.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-296}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 83.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 7.6e-268)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt y)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.6e-268) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 7.6d-268) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.6e-268) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(z) * Math.sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 7.6e-268:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(z) * math.sqrt(y))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 7.6e-268)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(y * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 7.6e-268)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 7.6e-268], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 7.6000000000000005e-268

    1. Initial program 68.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-out68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. *-commutative68.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]
    4. Applied egg-rr68.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

    if 7.6000000000000005e-268 < y

    1. Initial program 70.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative70.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqrt-prod56.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{x + y}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative56.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative56.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{y + x}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
    7. Applied egg-rr56.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 38.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{y}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification54.6%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 70.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-299}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1e-299) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* z (+ y x))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1e-299) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1d-299)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1e-299) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1e-299:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((z * (y + x)))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1e-299)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(z * Float64(y + x))));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1e-299)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1e-299], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-299}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -9.99999999999999992e-300

    1. Initial program 65.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified65.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 46.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative46.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)}} \]
    7. Simplified46.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)}} \]

    if -9.99999999999999992e-300 < y

    1. Initial program 72.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative72.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified72.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 49.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification47.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-299}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 69.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-296}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.8e-296) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.8e-296) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.8d-296) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.8e-296) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.8e-296:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.8e-296)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.8e-296)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.8e-296], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-296}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 2.7999999999999999e-296

    1. Initial program 67.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative67.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified67.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative48.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)}} \]
    7. Simplified48.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)}} \]

    if 2.7999999999999999e-296 < y

    1. Initial program 70.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative70.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 23.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative23.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]
    7. Simplified23.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification37.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-296}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 70.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))))
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 69.1%

    \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
    2. associate-+r+69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
    3. *-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
    4. +-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
    5. +-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
    6. *-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
    7. *-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
    8. associate-+l+69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
    9. +-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
    10. *-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
    11. associate-+l+69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
    12. *-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
    13. *-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
    14. +-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
  3. Simplified69.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Final simplification69.2%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 68.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -5e-310) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5e-310) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-5d-310)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5e-310) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -5e-310:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5e-310)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -5e-310)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -5e-310], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -4.999999999999985e-310

    1. Initial program 66.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative66.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 26.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]

    if -4.999999999999985e-310 < y

    1. Initial program 71.7%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      2. associate-+r+71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. *-commutative71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      5. +-commutative71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      8. associate-+l+71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      9. +-commutative71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      10. *-commutative71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. associate-+l+71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      13. *-commutative71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      14. +-commutative71.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified71.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 23.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative23.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]
    7. Simplified23.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification24.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 35.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)))
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 69.1%

    \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
    2. associate-+r+69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
    3. *-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
    4. +-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
    5. +-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
    6. *-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
    7. *-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
    8. associate-+l+69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
    9. +-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
    10. *-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
    11. associate-+l+69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
    12. *-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
    13. *-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
    14. +-commutative69.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
  3. Simplified69.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 25.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
  6. Final simplification25.5%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 82.2% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.25 \cdot \left(\left({y}^{-0.75} \cdot \left({z}^{-0.75} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + {z}^{0.25} \cdot {y}^{0.25}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < 7.636950090573675 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t\_0 \cdot t\_0\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (+
          (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z)))
          (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))))
   (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y))))
     (* (* t_0 t_0) 2.0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((pow(y, -0.75) * (pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (pow(z, 0.25) * pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (0.25d0 * (((y ** (-0.75d0)) * ((z ** (-0.75d0)) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ** 0.25d0) * (y ** 0.25d0))
    if (z < 7.636950090573675d+176) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((Math.pow(y, -0.75) * (Math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (Math.pow(z, 0.25) * Math.pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (0.25 * ((math.pow(y, -0.75) * (math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (math.pow(z, 0.25) * math.pow(y, 0.25))
	tmp = 0
	if z < 7.636950090573675e+176:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(0.25 * Float64(Float64((y ^ -0.75) * Float64((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * Float64(y + z))) + Float64((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) * z) + Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (0.25 * (((y ^ -0.75) * ((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(0.25 * N[(N[(N[Power[y, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[z, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Power[z, 0.25], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[y, 0.25], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, 7.636950090573675e+176], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := 0.25 \cdot \left(\left({y}^{-0.75} \cdot \left({z}^{-0.75} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + {z}^{0.25} \cdot {y}^{0.25}\\
\mathbf{if}\;z < 7.636950090573675 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(t\_0 \cdot t\_0\right) \cdot 2\\


\end{array}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024191 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z 763695009057367500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (* 2 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y)))) (* (* (+ (* 1/4 (* (* (pow y -3/4) (* (pow z -3/4) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 1/4) (pow y 1/4))) (+ (* 1/4 (* (* (pow y -3/4) (* (pow z -3/4) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 1/4) (pow y 1/4)))) 2)))

  (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))