a parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 9.8s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: N/A×

• 41.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * m), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * m), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (fma (- 1.0 m) (/ m v) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * fma((1.0 - m), (m / v), -1.0);
}

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * fma(Float64(1.0 - m), Float64(m / v), -1.0))
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} - 1\right) \]

   4. fmm-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right)} \]

   5. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 38.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-174} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{1}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m 1.4e-174) (not (<= m 1.0))) (- m) (* (* m m) (/ 1.0 v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= 1.4e-174) || !(m <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -m;
	} else {
		tmp = (m * m) * (1.0 / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= 1.4d-174) .or. (.not. (m <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = -m
    else
        tmp = (m * m) * (1.0d0 / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= 1.4e-174) || !(m <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -m;
	} else {
		tmp = (m * m) * (1.0 / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= 1.4e-174) or not (m <= 1.0):
		tmp = -m
	else:
		tmp = (m * m) * (1.0 / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= 1.4e-174) || !(m <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m * m) * Float64(1.0 / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= 1.4e-174) || ~((m <= 1.0)))
		tmp = -m;
	else
		tmp = (m * m) * (1.0 / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, 1.4e-174], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-m), N[(N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.39999999999999999e-174 or 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} - 1\right) \]

      4. fmm-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right)} \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 27.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{-1} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 27.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   8. Simplified 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   if 1.39999999999999999e-174 < m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in v around 0 72.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} \]

   7. Simplified 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 72.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in m around 0 69.3%

       \[\leadsto \left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 39.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-174} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{1}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{\frac{v}{m}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.25e-35) (* m (+ (/ m v) -1.0)) (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) (/ v m))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.25e-35) {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (m * (1.0 - m)) / (v / m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.25d-35) then
        tmp = m * ((m / v) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (m * (1.0d0 - m)) / (v / m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.25e-35) {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (m * (1.0 - m)) / (v / m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.25e-35:
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = (m * (1.0 - m)) / (v / m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.25e-35)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / Float64(v / m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.25e-35)
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = (m * (1.0 - m)) / (v / m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.25e-35], N[(m * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(v / m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.24999999999999991e-35

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 1.24999999999999991e-35 < m

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot {m}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \]

      3. associate-*r* 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot m\right) \cdot m} \]

      4. associate-/r/ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} \cdot m \]

      5. associate-*l/ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{\frac{v}{m}}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.7% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-20}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 6e-20) (* m (+ (/ m v) -1.0)) (* (/ (- 1.0 m) v) (* m m))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 6e-20) {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = ((1.0 - m) / v) * (m * m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 6d-20) then
        tmp = m * ((m / v) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = ((1.0d0 - m) / v) * (m * m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 6e-20) {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = ((1.0 - m) / v) * (m * m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 6e-20:
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = ((1.0 - m) / v) * (m * m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 6e-20)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v) * Float64(m * m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 6e-20)
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = ((1.0 - m) / v) * (m * m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 6e-20], N[(m * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 6.00000000000000057e-20

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 6.00000000000000057e-20 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-20}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 97.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{-m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (+ (/ m v) -1.0)) (* (* m m) (/ (- m) v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (m * m) * (-m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((m / v) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (m * m) * (-m / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (m * m) * (-m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = (m * m) * (-m / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m * m) * Float64(Float64(-m) / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = (m * m) * (-m / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision] * N[((-m) / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in m around inf 98.4%

       \[\leadsto \left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot m}}{v} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. neg-mul-1 98.4%

          \[\leadsto \left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{v} \]

   12. Simplified 98.4%

       \[\leadsto \left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{-m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 52.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (+ (/ m v) -1.0)) (- m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((m / v) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = -m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = -m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = -m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-m)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} - 1\right) \]

      4. fmm-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right)} \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 5.4%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{-1} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 5.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 5.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   8. Simplified 5.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 51.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ -1.0 (* m (/ (- 1.0 m) v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m * ((1.0d0 - m) / v)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 27.1% accurate, 5.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (- m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(-m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := (-m)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} - 1\right) \]

   4. fmm-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right)} \]

   5. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 25.0%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{-1} \]

6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 25.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

8. Simplified 25.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 3.1% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 m)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return m
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := m

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} - 1\right) \]

   4. fmm-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right)} \]

   5. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 25.0%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{-1} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]

   2. neg-mul-1 25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   3. neg-sub0 25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - m} \]

   4. sub-neg 25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + \left(-m\right)} \]

   5. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-m} \cdot \sqrt{-m}} \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 3.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-m\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)}} \]

   7. sqr-neg 3.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}} \]

   8. sqrt-unprod 3.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{m} \cdot \sqrt{m}} \]

   9. add-sqr-sqrt 3.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{m} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 3.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + m} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-lft-identity 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} \]

9. Simplified 3.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024186 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "a parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))