Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A

Percentage Accurate: 90.2% → 99.1%

Time: 11.0s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.1% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (/ (* (pow k m) a) (hypot 1.0 k)) (hypot 1.0 k)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return ((pow(k, m) * a) / hypot(1.0, k)) / hypot(1.0, k);
}

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return ((Math.pow(k, m) * a) / Math.hypot(1.0, k)) / Math.hypot(1.0, k);
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return ((math.pow(k, m) * a) / math.hypot(1.0, k)) / math.hypot(1.0, k)

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64((k ^ m) * a) / hypot(1.0, k)) / hypot(1.0, k))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (((k ^ m) * a) / hypot(1.0, k)) / hypot(1.0, k);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.2%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 92.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in k around inf 91.6%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r/ 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. *-commutative 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a}}{1 + k \cdot k} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k} \cdot \sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

   4. associate-/r* 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

   5. hypot-1-def 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. hypot-1-def 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (* (pow k m) a) (+ (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0)) (* k k)))))
   (if (<= t_0 INFINITY) t_0 (+ a (* a (* k (* k 99.0)))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = (pow(k, m) * a) / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = (Math.pow(k, m) * a) / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = (math.pow(k, m) * a) / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64((k ^ m) * a) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)) + Float64(k * k)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(k * 99.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = ((k ^ m) * a) / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, Infinity], t$95$0, N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 0.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 1.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 83.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in k around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(99 \cdot k\right)}\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot 99\right)}\right) \]

   10. Simplified 100.0%

       \[\leadsto a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot 99\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := {k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \mathbf{if}\;k \leq 0.013:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{t\_0}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{k}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (pow k m) a)))
   (if (<= k 0.013) t_0 (/ (/ t_0 (hypot 1.0 k)) k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = pow(k, m) * a;
	double tmp;
	if (k <= 0.013) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 / hypot(1.0, k)) / k;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = Math.pow(k, m) * a;
	double tmp;
	if (k <= 0.013) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 / Math.hypot(1.0, k)) / k;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = math.pow(k, m) * a
	tmp = 0
	if k <= 0.013:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 / math.hypot(1.0, k)) / k
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64((k ^ m) * a)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (k <= 0.013)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 / hypot(1.0, k)) / k);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = (k ^ m) * a;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (k <= 0.013)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = (t_0 / hypot(1.0, k)) / k;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[k, 0.013], t$95$0, N[(N[(t$95$0 / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / k), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if k < 0.0129999999999999994

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 96.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 96.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 96.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 96.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 96.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 96.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 96.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 96.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

   if 0.0129999999999999994 < k

   1. Initial program 84.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 84.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 84.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 84.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 84.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 84.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 84.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 84.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 84.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 84.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around inf 83.8%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 83.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. *-commutative 83.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a}}{1 + k \cdot k} \]

      3. add-sqr-sqrt 83.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k} \cdot \sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

      4. associate-/r* 83.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

      5. hypot-1-def 83.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. hypot-1-def 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in k around inf 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\color{blue}{k}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq 0.013:\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{k}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.3:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 3.3) (* a (/ (pow k m) (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))) (* (pow k m) a)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.3) {
		tmp = a * (pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(k, m) * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 3.3d0) then
        tmp = a * ((k ** m) / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0))))
    else
        tmp = (k ** m) * a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.3) {
		tmp = a * (Math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(k, m) * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.3:
		tmp = a * (math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(k, m) * a
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.3)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64((k ^ m) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64((k ^ m) * a);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.3)
		tmp = a * ((k ^ m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = (k ^ m) * a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 3.3], N[(a * N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.2999999999999998

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.2999999999999998 < m

   1. Initial program 77.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.3:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 96.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.5:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 4.5) (* a (/ (pow k m) (+ 1.0 (* k k)))) (* (pow k m) a)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.5) {
		tmp = a * (pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * k)));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(k, m) * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 4.5d0) then
        tmp = a * ((k ** m) / (1.0d0 + (k * k)))
    else
        tmp = (k ** m) * a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.5) {
		tmp = a * (Math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * k)));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(k, m) * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 4.5:
		tmp = a * (math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * k)))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(k, m) * a
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 4.5)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64((k ^ m) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k))));
	else
		tmp = Float64((k ^ m) * a);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 4.5)
		tmp = a * ((k ^ m) / (1.0 + (k * k)));
	else
		tmp = (k ^ m) * a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 4.5], N[(a * N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 4.5

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around inf 97.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]

   if 4.5 < m

   1. Initial program 77.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.5:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 96.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-12} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 0.00355\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m -2.8e-12) (not (<= m 0.00355)))
   (* (pow k m) a)
   (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -2.8e-12) || !(m <= 0.00355)) {
		tmp = pow(k, m) * a;
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= (-2.8d-12)) .or. (.not. (m <= 0.00355d0))) then
        tmp = (k ** m) * a
    else
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -2.8e-12) || !(m <= 0.00355)) {
		tmp = Math.pow(k, m) * a;
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= -2.8e-12) or not (m <= 0.00355):
		tmp = math.pow(k, m) * a
	else:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= -2.8e-12) || !(m <= 0.00355))
		tmp = Float64((k ^ m) * a);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= -2.8e-12) || ~((m <= 0.00355)))
		tmp = (k ^ m) * a;
	else
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, -2.8e-12], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 0.00355]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -2.8000000000000002e-12 or 0.0035500000000000002 < m

   1. Initial program 89.9%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 89.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 89.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 89.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 89.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 89.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 89.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 89.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 89.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 89.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

   if -2.8000000000000002e-12 < m < 0.0035500000000000002

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 96.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 96.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 96.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 96.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 96.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 96.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 96.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 96.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-12} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 0.00355\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 53.9% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.2) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0)))) (+ a (* a (* k (* k 99.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.2) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.2d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.2) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.2:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.2)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(k * 99.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.2)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.2], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.2000000000000002

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 2.2000000000000002 < m

   1. Initial program 77.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 26.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 30.8%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in k around inf 30.8%

      \[\leadsto a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(99 \cdot k\right)}\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 30.8%

         \[\leadsto a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot 99\right)}\right) \]

   10. Simplified 30.8%

       \[\leadsto a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot 99\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 53.1% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.2) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k k))) (+ a (* a (* k (* k 99.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.2) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.2d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
    else
        tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.2) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.2:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k))
	else:
		tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.2)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(k * 99.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.2)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	else
		tmp = a + (a * (k * (k * 99.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.2], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.2000000000000002

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 98.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around inf 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]

   if 2.2000000000000002 < m

   1. Initial program 77.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 26.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 30.8%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in k around inf 30.8%

      \[\leadsto a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(99 \cdot k\right)}\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 30.8%

         \[\leadsto a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot 99\right)}\right) \]

   10. Simplified 30.8%

       \[\leadsto a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot 99\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 43.4% accurate, 16.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / (1.0 + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / (1.0 + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a / (1.0 + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.2%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 92.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 47.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in k around inf 47.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 27.5% accurate, 16.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot 10} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a / (1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.2%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 92.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 47.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 30.8%

   \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 30.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

8. Simplified 30.8%

   \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 20.3% accurate, 16.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a + -10 \cdot \left(k \cdot a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (+ a (* -10.0 (* k a))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a + (-10.0 * (k * a));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a + ((-10.0d0) * (k * a))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a + (-10.0 * (k * a));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a + (-10.0 * (k * a))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(a + Float64(-10.0 * Float64(k * a)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a + (-10.0 * (k * a));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(a + N[(-10.0 * N[(k * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.2%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 92.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 47.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 20.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

7. Final simplification 20.0%

   \[\leadsto a + -10 \cdot \left(k \cdot a\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 19.3% accurate, 114.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 a)

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return a
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := a

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.2%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 92.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 92.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 47.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 19.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024185 
(FPCore (a k m)
  :name "Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))