Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 95.5% → 97.7%

Time: 10.9s

Alternatives: 16

Speedup: 0.4×

• 41.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.7% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma a b (fma x y (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, (z * t))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, Float64(z * t))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(a * b + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.5%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 95.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (fma x y (* z t)) (+ (* a b) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(x, y, (z * t)) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.5%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

3. Simplified 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 65.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+89}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{-211}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-164}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 0.76:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -1.3e+89)
     (+ (* a b) (* x y))
     (if (<= (* x y) -3.1e-211)
       t_1
       (if (<= (* x y) 1e-164)
         (+ (* a b) (* c i))
         (if (<= (* x y) 0.76) t_1 (+ (* c i) (* x y))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.3e+89) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else if ((x * y) <= -3.1e-211) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e-164) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 0.76) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t)
    if ((x * y) <= (-1.3d+89)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
    else if ((x * y) <= (-3.1d-211)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= 1d-164) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else if ((x * y) <= 0.76d0) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.3e+89) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else if ((x * y) <= -3.1e-211) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e-164) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 0.76) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1.3e+89:
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
	elif (x * y) <= -3.1e-211:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= 1e-164:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	elif (x * y) <= 0.76:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1.3e+89)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -3.1e-211)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e-164)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 0.76)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.3e+89)
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	elseif ((x * y) <= -3.1e-211)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1e-164)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 0.76)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.3e+89], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -3.1e-211], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e-164], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 0.76], t$95$1, N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.3e89

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.3e89 < (*.f64 x y) < -3.09999999999999995e-211 or 9.99999999999999962e-165 < (*.f64 x y) < 0.76000000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if -3.09999999999999995e-211 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.99999999999999962e-165

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 76.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if 0.76000000000000001 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 77.5%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+89}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{-211}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-164}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 0.76:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 64.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ t_2 := a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-184}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-164}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+203}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (* z t))) (t_2 (+ (* a b) (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -2.5e+100)
     t_2
     (if (<= (* x y) -4.6e-184)
       t_1
       (if (<= (* x y) 4.8e-164)
         (+ (* a b) (* c i))
         (if (<= (* x y) 3.6e+203) t_1 t_2))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t);
	double t_2 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.5e+100) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -4.6e-184) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 4.8e-164) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 3.6e+203) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t)
    t_2 = (a * b) + (x * y)
    if ((x * y) <= (-2.5d+100)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if ((x * y) <= (-4.6d-184)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= 4.8d-164) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else if ((x * y) <= 3.6d+203) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t);
	double t_2 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.5e+100) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -4.6e-184) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 4.8e-164) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 3.6e+203) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t)
	t_2 = (a * b) + (x * y)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -2.5e+100:
		tmp = t_2
	elif (x * y) <= -4.6e-184:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= 4.8e-164:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	elif (x * y) <= 3.6e+203:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2.5e+100)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -4.6e-184)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 4.8e-164)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 3.6e+203)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t);
	t_2 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.5e+100)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -4.6e-184)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 4.8e-164)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 3.6e+203)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2.5e+100], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4.6e-184], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 4.8e-164], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 3.6e+203], t$95$1, t$95$2]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2.4999999999999999e100 or 3.59999999999999982e203 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 89.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 89.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 90.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -2.4999999999999999e100 < (*.f64 x y) < -4.5999999999999999e-184 or 4.79999999999999966e-164 < (*.f64 x y) < 3.59999999999999982e203

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 71.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if -4.5999999999999999e-184 < (*.f64 x y) < 4.79999999999999966e-164

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 76.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-184}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-164}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+203}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 97.4% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t + \frac{a \cdot b}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* z (+ t (/ (* a b) z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (t + ((a * b) / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (t + ((a * b) / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = z * (t + ((a * b) / z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t + Float64(Float64(a * b) / z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = z * (t + ((a * b) / z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(z * N[(t + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 22.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 22.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 44.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 55.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 55.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 33.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 33.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 45.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{a \cdot b}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t + \frac{a \cdot b}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 43.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-132}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{+122}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -1.02e+139)
   (* c i)
   (if (<= (* c i) -5.4e-132)
     (* a b)
     (if (<= (* c i) 2.9e+66)
       (* x y)
       (if (<= (* c i) 2.15e+122) (* z t) (* c i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1.02e+139) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -5.4e-132) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2.9e+66) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2.15e+122) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-1.02d+139)) then
        tmp = c * i
    else if ((c * i) <= (-5.4d-132)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((c * i) <= 2.9d+66) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((c * i) <= 2.15d+122) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = c * i
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1.02e+139) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -5.4e-132) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2.9e+66) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2.15e+122) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -1.02e+139:
		tmp = c * i
	elif (c * i) <= -5.4e-132:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (c * i) <= 2.9e+66:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (c * i) <= 2.15e+122:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = c * i
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -1.02e+139)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= -5.4e-132)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 2.9e+66)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 2.15e+122)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -1.02e+139)
		tmp = c * i;
	elseif ((c * i) <= -5.4e-132)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 2.9e+66)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 2.15e+122)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = c * i;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -1.02e+139], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -5.4e-132], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 2.9e+66], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 2.15e+122], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -1.02e139 or 2.14999999999999986e122 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 93.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 74.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -1.02e139 < (*.f64 c i) < -5.3999999999999998e-132

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 46.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -5.3999999999999998e-132 < (*.f64 c i) < 2.89999999999999986e66

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 46.7%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in c around 0 42.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if 2.89999999999999986e66 < (*.f64 c i) < 2.14999999999999986e122

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 67.8%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 67.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-132}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{+122}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 65.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.16 \cdot 10^{-176}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+121}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* a b) (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -5.2e+100)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) -1.16e-176)
       (+ (* a b) (* z t))
       (if (<= (* x y) 2.5e+121) (+ (* a b) (* c i)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -5.2e+100) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1.16e-176) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.5e+121) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y)
    if ((x * y) <= (-5.2d+100)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= (-1.16d-176)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 2.5d+121) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -5.2e+100) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1.16e-176) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.5e+121) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -5.2e+100:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= -1.16e-176:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 2.5e+121:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -5.2e+100)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -1.16e-176)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2.5e+121)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -5.2e+100)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -1.16e-176)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 2.5e+121)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5.2e+100], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.16e-176], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2.5e+121], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -5.2000000000000003e100 or 2.50000000000000004e121 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 90.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -5.2000000000000003e100 < (*.f64 x y) < -1.15999999999999999e-176

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 65.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -1.15999999999999999e-176 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.50000000000000004e121

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 67.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.16 \cdot 10^{-176}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+121}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 62.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+197}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{-177}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+121}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -2e+197)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) -3.7e-177)
     (+ (* a b) (* z t))
     (if (<= (* x y) 9.5e+121) (+ (* a b) (* c i)) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+197) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -3.7e-177) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 9.5e+121) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-2d+197)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= (-3.7d-177)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 9.5d+121) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+197) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -3.7e-177) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 9.5e+121) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -2e+197:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= -3.7e-177:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 9.5e+121:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2e+197)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -3.7e-177)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 9.5e+121)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+197)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -3.7e-177)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 9.5e+121)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+197], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -3.7e-177], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 9.5e+121], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.9999999999999999e197 or 9.49999999999999949e121 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 89.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in c around 0 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.9999999999999999e197 < (*.f64 x y) < -3.69999999999999993e-177

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 63.6%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -3.69999999999999993e-177 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.49999999999999949e121

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 67.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+197}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{-177}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+121}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 87.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+164} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+56}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -1e+164) (not (<= (* c i) 4e+56)))
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -1e+164) || !((c * i) <= 4e+56)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-1d+164)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 4d+56))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -1e+164) || !((c * i) <= 4e+56)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+164) or not ((c * i) <= 4e+56):
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -1e+164) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 4e+56))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -1e+164) || ~(((c * i) <= 4e+56)))
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -1e+164], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 4e+56]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -1e164 or 4.00000000000000037e56 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -1e164 < (*.f64 c i) < 4.00000000000000037e56

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+164} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+56}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 87.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+164}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot \left(i + \frac{z \cdot t}{c}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (* c i) -1e+164)
     (+ (* a b) (* c (+ i (/ (* z t) c))))
     (if (<= (* c i) 1e+43) (+ (* a b) t_1) (+ (* c i) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+164) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * (i + ((z * t) / c)));
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1e+43) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
    if ((c * i) <= (-1d+164)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * (i + ((z * t) / c)))
    else if ((c * i) <= 1d+43) then
        tmp = (a * b) + t_1
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+164) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * (i + ((z * t) / c)));
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1e+43) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -1e+164:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * (i + ((z * t) / c)))
	elif (c * i) <= 1e+43:
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -1e+164)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * Float64(i + Float64(Float64(z * t) / c))));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 1e+43)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+164)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * (i + ((z * t) / c)));
	elseif ((c * i) <= 1e+43)
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -1e+164], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * N[(i + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 1e+43], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -1e164

   1. Initial program 91.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 97.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(i + \frac{t \cdot z}{c}\right)} \]

   if -1e164 < (*.f64 c i) < 1.00000000000000001e43

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 1.00000000000000001e43 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 91.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+164}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot \left(i + \frac{z \cdot t}{c}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 87.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{+36}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -2.2e+73)
     (+ (* a b) t_1)
     (if (<= (* x y) 2.25e+36)
       (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
       (+ (* c i) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.2e+73) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.25e+36) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
    if ((x * y) <= (-2.2d+73)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= 2.25d+36) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.2e+73) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.25e+36) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -2.2e+73:
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1
	elif (x * y) <= 2.25e+36:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2.2e+73)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2.25e+36)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.2e+73)
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 2.25e+36)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2.2e+73], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2.25e+36], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2.2e73

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 93.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -2.2e73 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.24999999999999998e36

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 2.24999999999999998e36 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{+36}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 83.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{+102}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+68}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -7.4e+102)
   (+ (* a b) (* x y))
   (if (<= (* x y) 5.2e+68)
     (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
     (+ (* c i) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -7.4e+102) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5.2e+68) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-7.4d+102)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
    else if ((x * y) <= 5.2d+68) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -7.4e+102) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5.2e+68) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -7.4e+102:
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
	elif (x * y) <= 5.2e+68:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -7.4e+102)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 5.2e+68)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -7.4e+102)
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 5.2e+68)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -7.4e+102], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5.2e+68], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -7.40000000000000045e102

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -7.40000000000000045e102 < (*.f64 x y) < 5.1999999999999996e68

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 5.1999999999999996e68 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 89.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 85.4%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{+102}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+68}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 43.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+150}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-97}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -3.5e+150)
   (* c i)
   (if (<= (* c i) -4.8e-97)
     (* a b)
     (if (<= (* c i) 4.9e+124) (* z t) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -3.5e+150) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -4.8e-97) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 4.9e+124) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-3.5d+150)) then
        tmp = c * i
    else if ((c * i) <= (-4.8d-97)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((c * i) <= 4.9d+124) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = c * i
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -3.5e+150) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -4.8e-97) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 4.9e+124) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -3.5e+150:
		tmp = c * i
	elif (c * i) <= -4.8e-97:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (c * i) <= 4.9e+124:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = c * i
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -3.5e+150)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= -4.8e-97)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 4.9e+124)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -3.5e+150)
		tmp = c * i;
	elseif ((c * i) <= -4.8e-97)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 4.9e+124)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = c * i;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -3.5e+150], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -4.8e-97], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 4.9e+124], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -3.49999999999999984e150 or 4.90000000000000035e124 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 93.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 74.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -3.49999999999999984e150 < (*.f64 c i) < -4.8e-97

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 46.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -4.8e-97 < (*.f64 c i) < 4.90000000000000035e124

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 60.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 38.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+150}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-97}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 62.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+206} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+122}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -4.8e+206) (not (<= (* x y) 4.9e+122)))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.8e+206) || !((x * y) <= 4.9e+122)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-4.8d+206)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 4.9d+122))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.8e+206) || !((x * y) <= 4.9e+122)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -4.8e+206) or not ((x * y) <= 4.9e+122):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -4.8e+206) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 4.9e+122))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.8e+206) || ~(((x * y) <= 4.9e+122)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4.8e+206], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 4.9e+122]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.7999999999999999e206 or 4.8999999999999998e122 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 85.2%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in c around 0 80.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -4.7999999999999999e206 < (*.f64 x y) < 4.8999999999999998e122

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 61.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+206} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+122}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 42.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+136} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -8e+136) (not (<= (* c i) 1.55e+50))) (* c i) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -8e+136) || !((c * i) <= 1.55e+50)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-8d+136)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 1.55d+50))) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -8e+136) || !((c * i) <= 1.55e+50)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -8e+136) or not ((c * i) <= 1.55e+50):
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -8e+136) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 1.55e+50))
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -8e+136) || ~(((c * i) <= 1.55e+50)))
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -8e+136], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 1.55e+50]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -8.00000000000000047e136 or 1.55000000000000001e50 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 64.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -8.00000000000000047e136 < (*.f64 c i) < 1.55000000000000001e50

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 34.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 45.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+136} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 27.8% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.5%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 26.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024185 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))