Main:bigenough2 from A

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.3s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (+ x z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, (x + z), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(x + z), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z + x, x\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + z}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 61.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+197}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-19} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-24}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -8.8e+197)
   (* y x)
   (if (or (<= y -2.7e-19) (not (<= y 2.9e-24))) (* y z) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8.8e+197) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if ((y <= -2.7e-19) || !(y <= 2.9e-24)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-8.8d+197)) then
        tmp = y * x
    else if ((y <= (-2.7d-19)) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.9d-24))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8.8e+197) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if ((y <= -2.7e-19) || !(y <= 2.9e-24)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -8.8e+197:
		tmp = y * x
	elif (y <= -2.7e-19) or not (y <= 2.9e-24):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -8.8e+197)
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	elseif ((y <= -2.7e-19) || !(y <= 2.9e-24))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -8.8e+197)
		tmp = y * x;
	elseif ((y <= -2.7e-19) || ~((y <= 2.9e-24)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -8.8e+197], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.7e-19], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.9e-24]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -8.79999999999999957e197

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 78.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   8. Simplified 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -8.79999999999999957e197 < y < -2.7000000000000001e-19 or 2.8999999999999999e-24 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 57.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -2.7000000000000001e-19 < y < 2.8999999999999999e-24

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 72.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 72.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 72.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 72.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+197}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-19} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-24}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+18} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.3e+18) (not (<= y 1.0))) (* y (+ x z)) (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.3e+18) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.3d+18)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * (x + z)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.3e+18) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.3e+18) or not (y <= 1.0):
		tmp = y * (x + z)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.3e+18) || !(y <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.3e+18) || ~((y <= 1.0)))
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.3e+18], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.3e18 or 1 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z + x, x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + z}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} + x \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 96.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]

   if -1.3e18 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+18} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-15} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.4 \cdot 10^{-23}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -6e-15) (not (<= y 7.4e-23))) (* y (+ x z)) (* x (+ y 1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6e-15) || !(y <= 7.4e-23)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-6d-15)) .or. (.not. (y <= 7.4d-23))) then
        tmp = y * (x + z)
    else
        tmp = x * (y + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6e-15) || !(y <= 7.4e-23)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -6e-15) or not (y <= 7.4e-23):
		tmp = y * (x + z)
	else:
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -6e-15) || !(y <= 7.4e-23))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -6e-15) || ~((y <= 7.4e-23)))
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	else
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -6e-15], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 7.4e-23]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -6e-15 or 7.4000000000000005e-23 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z + x, x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + z}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} + x \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 96.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]

   if -6e-15 < y < 7.4000000000000005e-23

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 72.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-15} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.4 \cdot 10^{-23}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 75.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+120} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+127}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3.4e+120) (not (<= z 1.02e+127))) (* y z) (* x (+ y 1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.4e+120) || !(z <= 1.02e+127)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-3.4d+120)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.02d+127))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x * (y + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.4e+120) || !(z <= 1.02e+127)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -3.4e+120) or not (z <= 1.02e+127):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3.4e+120) || !(z <= 1.02e+127))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -3.4e+120) || ~((z <= 1.02e+127)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3.4e+120], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.02e+127]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.39999999999999999e120 or 1.02e127 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 93.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 79.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -3.39999999999999999e120 < z < 1.02e127

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 78.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 78.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+120} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+127}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 60.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+18} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.3e+18) (not (<= y 1.0))) (* y x) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.3e+18) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.3d+18)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * x
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.3e+18) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.3e+18) or not (y <= 1.0):
		tmp = y * x
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.3e+18) || !(y <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.3e+18) || ~((y <= 1.0)))
		tmp = y * x;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.3e+18], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.3e18 or 1 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 51.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 51.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 50.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 50.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   8. Simplified 50.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.3e18 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 67.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 66.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+18} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (x + z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (x + z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(x + z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (x + z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 36.4% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 60.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

5. Simplified 60.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 37.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024182 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Main:bigenough2 from A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (+ z x))))