Diagrams.Backend.Rasterific:$crender from diagrams-rasterific-1.3.1.3

Percentage Accurate: 98.1% → 100.0%

Time: 5.5s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.3×

• 21.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((1.0d0 - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((1.0d0 - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z - x \cdot \left(z - y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z (* x (- z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z - (x * (z - y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z - (x * (z - y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z - (x * (z - y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z - (x * (z - y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z - Float64(x * Float64(z - y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z - (x * (z - y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z - N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}\right) + x \cdot y \]

   4. neg-sub0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   5. neg-sub0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   6. *-commutative 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)}\right) + x \cdot y \]

   7. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   8. remove-double-neg 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot \left(1 - x\right) + x \cdot y \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out-- 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot z - x \cdot z\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   10. *-lft-identity 99.6%

       \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z} - x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y \]

   11. associate-+l- 99.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(x \cdot z - x \cdot y\right)} \]

   12. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.1% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 1.0))) (* x (- y z)) (+ z (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    else
        tmp = z + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 1.0):
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 1.0)))
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	else
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 1 < x

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 98.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]

   if -1 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-39} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.185\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.12e-39) (not (<= x 0.185))) (* x (- y z)) (* z (- 1.0 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.12e-39) || !(x <= 0.185)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.12d-39)) .or. (.not. (x <= 0.185d0))) then
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    else
        tmp = z * (1.0d0 - x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.12e-39) || !(x <= 0.185)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.12e-39) or not (x <= 0.185):
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	else:
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.12e-39) || !(x <= 0.185))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.12e-39) || ~((x <= 0.185)))
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	else
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.12e-39], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 0.185]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.12e-39 or 0.185 < x

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]

   if -1.12e-39 < x < 0.185

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}\right) + x \cdot y \]

      4. neg-sub0 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      5. neg-sub0 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      6. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)}\right) + x \cdot y \]

      7. distribute-lft-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      8. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot \left(1 - x\right) + x \cdot y \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot z - x \cdot z\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      10. *-lft-identity 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z} - x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y \]

      11. associate-+l- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(x \cdot z - x \cdot y\right)} \]

      12. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.3%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 75.3%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   7. Simplified 75.3%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-39} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.185\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-43} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.4e-43) (not (<= x 1.7e-6))) (* x (- y z)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.4e-43) || !(x <= 1.7e-6)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.4d-43)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.7d-6))) then
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.4e-43) || !(x <= 1.7e-6)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.4e-43) or not (x <= 1.7e-6):
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.4e-43) || !(x <= 1.7e-6))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.4e-43) || ~((x <= 1.7e-6)))
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.4e-43], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.7e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.39999999999999982e-43 or 1.70000000000000003e-6 < x

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 96.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]

   if -5.39999999999999982e-43 < x < 1.70000000000000003e-6

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-43} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 60.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 26000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 26000000.0))) (* z (- x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 26000000.0)) {
		tmp = z * -x;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 26000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = z * -x
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 26000000.0)) {
		tmp = z * -x;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 26000000.0):
		tmp = z * -x
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 26000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-x));
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 26000000.0)))
		tmp = z * -x;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 26000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * (-x)), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 2.6e7 < x

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 60.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 60.6%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 60.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -1 < x < 2.6e7

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 26000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 61.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-39} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.2e-39) (not (<= x 3.4e-7))) (* x y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.2e-39) || !(x <= 3.4e-7)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.2d-39)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.4d-7))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.2e-39) || !(x <= 3.4e-7)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.2e-39) or not (x <= 3.4e-7):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.2e-39) || !(x <= 3.4e-7))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.2e-39) || ~((x <= 3.4e-7)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.2e-39], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.4e-7]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.20000000000000008e-39 or 3.39999999999999974e-7 < x

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 44.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.20000000000000008e-39 < x < 3.39999999999999974e-7

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-39} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 35.2% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.4%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 38.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024182 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Backend.Rasterific:$crender from diagrams-rasterific-1.3.1.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))