Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 89.9% → 96.7%

Time: 18.9s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 0.5×

• 47.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 89.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_2 - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)}{y} + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (- t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- t_2 (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* y (+ (* -2.0 (/ (* c (* t_1 i)) y)) (* x 2.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = y * ((-2.0 * ((c * (t_1 * i)) / y)) + (x * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = y * ((-2.0 * ((c * (t_1 * i)) / y)) + (x * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= math.inf:
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = y * ((-2.0 * ((c * (t_1 * i)) / y)) + (x * 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_2 - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_2 - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(-2.0 * Float64(Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)) / y)) + Float64(x * 2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = y * ((-2.0 * ((c * (t_1 * i)) / y)) + (x * 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$2 - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$2 - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(N[(-2.0 * N[(N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 92.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 92.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 97.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 6.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 6.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 13.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 13.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 13.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 13.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 26.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(2 \cdot x + 2 \cdot \frac{t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{y}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 60.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{y} + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}{y} + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 83.4% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := -2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ t_3 := \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ t_4 := 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - t\_3\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_3 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_3 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-62}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_4\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_3 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_3 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+153}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_4\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c)))
        (t_2 (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i))))
        (t_3 (* (* c t_1) i))
        (t_4 (* 2.0 (- (* x y) t_3))))
   (if (<= t_3 (- INFINITY))
     t_2
     (if (<= t_3 -1e-62)
       t_4
       (if (<= t_3 5e-18)
         (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)
         (if (<= t_3 2e+153) t_4 t_2))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	double t_3 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double t_4 = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_3);
	double tmp;
	if (t_3 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_3 <= -1e-62) {
		tmp = t_4;
	} else if (t_3 <= 5e-18) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else if (t_3 <= 2e+153) {
		tmp = t_4;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	double t_3 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double t_4 = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_3);
	double tmp;
	if (t_3 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_3 <= -1e-62) {
		tmp = t_4;
	} else if (t_3 <= 5e-18) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else if (t_3 <= 2e+153) {
		tmp = t_4;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	t_3 = (c * t_1) * i
	t_4 = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_3)
	tmp = 0
	if t_3 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = t_2
	elif t_3 <= -1e-62:
		tmp = t_4
	elif t_3 <= 5e-18:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	elif t_3 <= 2e+153:
		tmp = t_4
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)))
	t_3 = Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)
	t_4 = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - t_3))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_3 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_3 <= -1e-62)
		tmp = t_4;
	elseif (t_3 <= 5e-18)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	elseif (t_3 <= 2e+153)
		tmp = t_4;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	t_3 = (c * t_1) * i;
	t_4 = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_3);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_3 <= -Inf)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_3 <= -1e-62)
		tmp = t_4;
	elseif (t_3 <= 5e-18)
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	elseif (t_3 <= 2e+153)
		tmp = t_4;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$3 = N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$4 = N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$3), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$3, (-Infinity)], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[t$95$3, -1e-62], t$95$4, If[LessEqual[t$95$3, 5e-18], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$3, 2e+153], t$95$4, t$95$2]]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -inf.0 or 2e153 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 70.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 70.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 70.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -1e-62 or 5.00000000000000036e-18 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 2e153

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 85.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   if -1e-62 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 5.00000000000000036e-18

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-62}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+153}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := -2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ t_3 := \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ t_4 := 2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - t\_3\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_3 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_3 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_4\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_3 \leq 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_3 \leq 10^{+307}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_4\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c)))
        (t_2 (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i))))
        (t_3 (* (* c t_1) i))
        (t_4 (* 2.0 (- (* z t) t_3))))
   (if (<= t_3 (- INFINITY))
     t_2
     (if (<= t_3 -5e+49)
       t_4
       (if (<= t_3 1e-26)
         (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)
         (if (<= t_3 1e+307) t_4 t_2))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	double t_3 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double t_4 = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_3);
	double tmp;
	if (t_3 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_3 <= -5e+49) {
		tmp = t_4;
	} else if (t_3 <= 1e-26) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else if (t_3 <= 1e+307) {
		tmp = t_4;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	double t_3 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double t_4 = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_3);
	double tmp;
	if (t_3 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_3 <= -5e+49) {
		tmp = t_4;
	} else if (t_3 <= 1e-26) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else if (t_3 <= 1e+307) {
		tmp = t_4;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	t_3 = (c * t_1) * i
	t_4 = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_3)
	tmp = 0
	if t_3 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = t_2
	elif t_3 <= -5e+49:
		tmp = t_4
	elif t_3 <= 1e-26:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	elif t_3 <= 1e+307:
		tmp = t_4
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)))
	t_3 = Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)
	t_4 = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - t_3))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_3 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_3 <= -5e+49)
		tmp = t_4;
	elseif (t_3 <= 1e-26)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	elseif (t_3 <= 1e+307)
		tmp = t_4;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	t_3 = (c * t_1) * i;
	t_4 = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_3);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_3 <= -Inf)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_3 <= -5e+49)
		tmp = t_4;
	elseif (t_3 <= 1e-26)
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	elseif (t_3 <= 1e+307)
		tmp = t_4;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$3 = N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$4 = N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$3), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$3, (-Infinity)], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[t$95$3, -5e+49], t$95$4, If[LessEqual[t$95$3, 1e-26], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$3, 1e+307], t$95$4, t$95$2]]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -inf.0 or 9.99999999999999986e306 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 67.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 67.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 67.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 84.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 84.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 84.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -5.0000000000000004e49 or 1e-26 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 9.99999999999999986e306

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 93.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + \frac{t \cdot z}{x}\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 88.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{t \cdot \frac{z}{x}}\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   5. Simplified 88.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + t \cdot \frac{z}{x}\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   if -5.0000000000000004e49 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 1e-26

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 10^{+307}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 95.1% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(t\_2 \leq 10^{+307}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - t\_2\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)))
   (if (or (<= t_2 (- INFINITY)) (not (<= t_2 1e+307)))
     (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i)))
     (* (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) t_2) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -((double) INFINITY)) || !(t_2 <= 1e+307)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) || !(t_2 <= 1e+307)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 <= -math.inf) or not (t_2 <= 1e+307):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	else:
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_2 <= Float64(-Inf)) || !(t_2 <= 1e+307))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 <= -Inf) || ~((t_2 <= 1e+307)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	else
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$2, (-Infinity)], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$2, 1e+307]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -inf.0 or 9.99999999999999986e306 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 67.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 67.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 67.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 84.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 84.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 84.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 9.99999999999999986e306

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 10^{+307}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 87.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+239} \lor \neg \left(t\_2 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+167}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - i \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)))
   (if (or (<= t_2 -5e+239) (not (<= t_2 2e+167)))
     (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i)))
     (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* i (* a c)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -5e+239) || !(t_2 <= 2e+167)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = a + (b * c)
    t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
    if ((t_2 <= (-5d+239)) .or. (.not. (t_2 <= 2d+167))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * (t_1 * i))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -5e+239) || !(t_2 <= 2e+167)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 <= -5e+239) or not (t_2 <= 2e+167):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_2 <= -5e+239) || !(t_2 <= 2e+167))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(i * Float64(a * c))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 <= -5e+239) || ~((t_2 <= 2e+167)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$2, -5e+239], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$2, 2e+167]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(i * N[(a * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -5.00000000000000007e239 or 2.0000000000000001e167 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 72.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 72.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 72.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 83.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 83.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 83.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 83.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -5.00000000000000007e239 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 2.0000000000000001e167

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 90.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot c\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   5. Simplified 90.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+239} \lor \neg \left(\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+167}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - i \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 95.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_2 - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}{x} + y \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (- t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- t_2 (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* x (+ (* -2.0 (/ (* a (* c i)) x)) (* y 2.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * ((-2.0 * ((a * (c * i)) / x)) + (y * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * ((-2.0 * ((a * (c * i)) / x)) + (y * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= math.inf:
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = x * ((-2.0 * ((a * (c * i)) / x)) + (y * 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_2 - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_2 - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(Float64(-2.0 * Float64(Float64(a * Float64(c * i)) / x)) + Float64(y * 2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = x * ((-2.0 * ((a * (c * i)) / x)) + (y * 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$2 - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$2 - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(N[(-2.0 * N[(N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 92.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 92.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 97.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 33.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot c\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 33.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   5. Simplified 33.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 46.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot \frac{t \cdot z - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}{x}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in t around 0 60.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}{x} + 2 \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}{x} + y \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 78.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+238}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + t \cdot \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(x + t \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -2e+238)
   (* x (* 2.0 (+ y (* t (/ z x)))))
   (if (<= (* x y) 5e+87)
     (* 2.0 (- (* z t) (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i))))
     (* y (* 2.0 (+ x (* t (/ z y))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+238) {
		tmp = x * (2.0 * (y + (t * (z / x))));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5e+87) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = y * (2.0 * (x + (t * (z / y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-2d+238)) then
        tmp = x * (2.0d0 * (y + (t * (z / x))))
    else if ((x * y) <= 5d+87) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
    else
        tmp = y * (2.0d0 * (x + (t * (z / y))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+238) {
		tmp = x * (2.0 * (y + (t * (z / x))));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5e+87) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = y * (2.0 * (x + (t * (z / y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -2e+238:
		tmp = x * (2.0 * (y + (t * (z / x))))
	elif (x * y) <= 5e+87:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
	else:
		tmp = y * (2.0 * (x + (t * (z / y))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2e+238)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(2.0 * Float64(y + Float64(t * Float64(z / x)))));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 5e+87)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + Float64(t * Float64(z / y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+238)
		tmp = x * (2.0 * (y + (t * (z / x))));
	elseif ((x * y) <= 5e+87)
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = y * (2.0 * (x + (t * (z / y))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+238], N[(x * N[(2.0 * N[(y + N[(t * N[(z / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5e+87], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(2.0 * N[(x + N[(t * N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2.0000000000000001e238

   1. Initial program 84.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 84.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 84.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 88.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 88.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 88.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot \frac{t \cdot z}{x}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 88.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(y + \frac{t \cdot z}{x}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 92.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{t \cdot \frac{z}{x}}\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + t \cdot \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.0000000000000001e238 < (*.f64 x y) < 4.9999999999999998e87

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 89.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 93.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 93.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 78.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if 4.9999999999999998e87 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 83.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 84.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 84.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(2 \cdot x + 2 \cdot \frac{t \cdot z}{y}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 76.7%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(x + \frac{t \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 76.7%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{t \cdot \frac{z}{y}}\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(x + t \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+238}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + t \cdot \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(x + t \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 38.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-265}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3550000:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* x (* y 2.0))))
   (if (<= y -1.6e-16)
     t_1
     (if (<= y 1.4e-265)
       (* t (* z 2.0))
       (if (<= y 3550000.0) (* -2.0 (* a (* c i))) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = x * (y * 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.6e-16) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 1.4e-265) {
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	} else if (y <= 3550000.0) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x * (y * 2.0d0)
    if (y <= (-1.6d-16)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (y <= 1.4d-265) then
        tmp = t * (z * 2.0d0)
    else if (y <= 3550000.0d0) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (a * (c * i))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = x * (y * 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.6e-16) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 1.4e-265) {
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	} else if (y <= 3550000.0) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = x * (y * 2.0)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.6e-16:
		tmp = t_1
	elif y <= 1.4e-265:
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0)
	elif y <= 3550000.0:
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(x * Float64(y * 2.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.6e-16)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 1.4e-265)
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(z * 2.0));
	elseif (y <= 3550000.0)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(a * Float64(c * i)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = x * (y * 2.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.6e-16)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 1.4e-265)
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	elseif (y <= 3550000.0)
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x * N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.6e-16], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 1.4e-265], N[(t * N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 3550000.0], N[(-2.0 * N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1.60000000000000011e-16 or 3.55e6 < y

   1. Initial program 84.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 84.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 84.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 89.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 89.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 89.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   if -1.60000000000000011e-16 < y < 1.40000000000000012e-265

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 93.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 93.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 33.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 33.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 33.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot 2\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. associate-*l* 33.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 33.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 33.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]

   if 1.40000000000000012e-265 < y < 3.55e6

   1. Initial program 87.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 87.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 87.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 91.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 91.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 91.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 41.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 74.4% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+83} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+60}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -1.6e+83) (not (<= c 2e+60)))
   (* -2.0 (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i)))
   (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -1.6e+83) || !(c <= 2e+60)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-1.6d+83)) .or. (.not. (c <= 2d+60))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
    else
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -1.6e+83) || !(c <= 2e+60)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -1.6e+83) or not (c <= 2e+60):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -1.6e+83) || !(c <= 2e+60))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -1.6e+83) || ~((c <= 2e+60)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	else
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -1.6e+83], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 2e+60]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -1.5999999999999999e83 or 1.9999999999999999e60 < c

   1. Initial program 70.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 70.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 70.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 87.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 87.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 87.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.5999999999999999e83 < c < 1.9999999999999999e60

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 93.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 93.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+83} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+60}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 69.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+84} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -1.2e+84) (not (<= c 3.3e+71)))
   (* -2.0 (* c (* b (* c i))))
   (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -1.2e+84) || !(c <= 3.3e+71)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-1.2d+84)) .or. (.not. (c <= 3.3d+71))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * (b * (c * i)))
    else
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -1.2e+84) || !(c <= 3.3e+71)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -1.2e+84) or not (c <= 3.3e+71):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -1.2e+84) || !(c <= 3.3e+71))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(b * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -1.2e+84) || ~((c <= 3.3e+71)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -1.2e+84], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 3.3e+71]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(b * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -1.2e84 or 3.2999999999999998e71 < c

   1. Initial program 70.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 70.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 70.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 86.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 86.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 86.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 71.4%

      \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]

   if -1.2e84 < c < 3.2999999999999998e71

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 98.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 94.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 93.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+84} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 47.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+83} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+72}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -1.6e+83) (not (<= c 2.2e+72)))
   (* -2.0 (* c (* b (* c i))))
   (* x (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -1.6e+83) || !(c <= 2.2e+72)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-1.6d+83)) .or. (.not. (c <= 2.2d+72))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * (b * (c * i)))
    else
        tmp = x * (y * 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -1.6e+83) || !(c <= 2.2e+72)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -1.6e+83) or not (c <= 2.2e+72):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -1.6e+83) || !(c <= 2.2e+72))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(b * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -1.6e+83) || ~((c <= 2.2e+72)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -1.6e+83], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 2.2e+72]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(b * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -1.5999999999999999e83 or 2.2e72 < c

   1. Initial program 70.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 70.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 70.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 86.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 86.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 86.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 71.4%

      \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]

   if -1.5999999999999999e83 < c < 2.2e72

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 98.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 94.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 93.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 39.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 39.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 39.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 39.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 51.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+83} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+72}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 33.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+138}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t 5.5e+138) (* x (* y 2.0)) (* t (* z 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 5.5e+138) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= 5.5d+138) then
        tmp = x * (y * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = t * (z * 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 5.5e+138) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= 5.5e+138:
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= 5.5e+138)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(z * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= 5.5e+138)
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[t, 5.5e+138], N[(x * N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < 5.4999999999999999e138

   1. Initial program 88.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 88.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 88.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 93.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 93.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 33.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 33.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 33.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 33.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   if 5.4999999999999999e138 < t

   1. Initial program 82.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 82.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 82.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 80.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 80.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 80.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 80.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot 2\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. associate-*l* 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 52.6%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 29.7% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* t (* z 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return t * (z * 2.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = t * (z * 2.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return t * (z * 2.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return t * (z * 2.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(t * Float64(z * 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(t * N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.3%

   \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 87.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 87.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   3. associate-*l* 91.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   4. +-commutative 91.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   5. fma-define 91.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 91.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 25.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 25.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

   2. *-commutative 25.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot 2\right)} \cdot z \]

   3. associate-*l* 25.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 25.6%

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]

7. Simplified 25.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 93.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(c * i))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024182 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (* 2 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

  (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))