Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.6% → 99.3%

Time: 12.5s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 0.6×

• 33.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-10} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+58}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.5e-10) (not (<= z 4.9e+58)))
   (* z (+ y (+ (/ x z) (* a (+ b (/ t z))))))
   (+ (+ (* a (* z b)) (* t a)) (+ x (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.5e-10) || !(z <= 4.9e+58)) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = ((a * (z * b)) + (t * a)) + (x + (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.5d-10)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.9d+58))) then
        tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
    else
        tmp = ((a * (z * b)) + (t * a)) + (x + (y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.5e-10) || !(z <= 4.9e+58)) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = ((a * (z * b)) + (t * a)) + (x + (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.5e-10) or not (z <= 4.9e+58):
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
	else:
		tmp = ((a * (z * b)) + (t * a)) + (x + (y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.5e-10) || !(z <= 4.9e+58))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(Float64(x / z) + Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(t / z))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(a * Float64(z * b)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(x + Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.5e-10) || ~((z <= 4.9e+58)))
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	else
		tmp = ((a * (z * b)) + (t * a)) + (x + (y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.5e-10], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.9e+58]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y + N[(N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(b + N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.50000000000000016e-10 or 4.90000000000000018e58 < z

   1. Initial program 81.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 81.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 94.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 94.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 98.1%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.50000000000000016e-10 < z < 4.90000000000000018e58

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-10} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+58}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.1% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(t \cdot a + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)\right) + \left(z \cdot a\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (* t a) (+ x (* y z))) (* (* z a) b))))
   (if (<= t_1 5e+300) t_1 (* z (+ y (+ (/ x z) (* a (+ b (/ t z)))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((t * a) + (x + (y * z))) + ((z * a) * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 5e+300) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = ((t * a) + (x + (y * z))) + ((z * a) * b)
    if (t_1 <= 5d+300) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((t * a) + (x + (y * z))) + ((z * a) * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 5e+300) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = ((t * a) + (x + (y * z))) + ((z * a) * b)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= 5e+300:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(t * a) + Float64(x + Float64(y * z))) + Float64(Float64(z * a) * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 5e+300)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(Float64(x / z) + Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(t / z))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = ((t * a) + (x + (y * z))) + ((z * a) * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= 5e+300)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 5e+300], t$95$1, N[(z * N[(y + N[(N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(b + N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < 5.00000000000000026e300

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 5.00000000000000026e300 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 62.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 62.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 72.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 78.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 78.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 78.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 78.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 88.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 98.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(t \cdot a + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)\right) + \left(z \cdot a\right) \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t \cdot a + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)\right) + \left(z \cdot a\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 38.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.1 \cdot 10^{-288}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-114}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+210}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.05e-41)
   (* y z)
   (if (<= z 6.1e-288)
     x
     (if (<= z 2.9e-114)
       (* t a)
       (if (<= z 2e+110) x (if (<= z 4.5e+210) (* z (* a b)) (* y z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.05e-41) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 6.1e-288) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 2.9e-114) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (z <= 2e+110) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 4.5e+210) {
		tmp = z * (a * b);
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.05d-41)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (z <= 6.1d-288) then
        tmp = x
    else if (z <= 2.9d-114) then
        tmp = t * a
    else if (z <= 2d+110) then
        tmp = x
    else if (z <= 4.5d+210) then
        tmp = z * (a * b)
    else
        tmp = y * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.05e-41) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 6.1e-288) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 2.9e-114) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (z <= 2e+110) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 4.5e+210) {
		tmp = z * (a * b);
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.05e-41:
		tmp = y * z
	elif z <= 6.1e-288:
		tmp = x
	elif z <= 2.9e-114:
		tmp = t * a
	elif z <= 2e+110:
		tmp = x
	elif z <= 4.5e+210:
		tmp = z * (a * b)
	else:
		tmp = y * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.05e-41)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (z <= 6.1e-288)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 2.9e-114)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	elseif (z <= 2e+110)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 4.5e+210)
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(a * b));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.05e-41)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (z <= 6.1e-288)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 2.9e-114)
		tmp = t * a;
	elseif (z <= 2e+110)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 4.5e+210)
		tmp = z * (a * b);
	else
		tmp = y * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.05e-41], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 6.1e-288], x, If[LessEqual[z, 2.9e-114], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2e+110], x, If[LessEqual[z, 4.5e+210], N[(z * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if z < -1.05000000000000006e-41 or 4.50000000000000004e210 < z

   1. Initial program 82.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 82.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 83.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 94.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 97.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 47.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 47.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   10. Simplified 47.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -1.05000000000000006e-41 < z < 6.09999999999999982e-288 or 2.89999999999999997e-114 < z < 2e110

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 46.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 6.09999999999999982e-288 < z < 2.89999999999999997e-114

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if 2e110 < z < 4.50000000000000004e210

   1. Initial program 78.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 78.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 77.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 90.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in b around inf 83.0%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around inf 60.7%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.1 \cdot 10^{-288}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-114}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+210}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 38.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-236}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.22 \cdot 10^{-88}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{+105}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -7.4e-30)
   x
   (if (<= x -3.2e-236)
     (* t a)
     (if (<= x 1.22e-88)
       (* y z)
       (if (<= x 1.8e-57) x (if (<= x 5.1e+105) (* t a) x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7.4e-30) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -3.2e-236) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (x <= 1.22e-88) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (x <= 1.8e-57) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 5.1e+105) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-7.4d-30)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= (-3.2d-236)) then
        tmp = t * a
    else if (x <= 1.22d-88) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (x <= 1.8d-57) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 5.1d+105) then
        tmp = t * a
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7.4e-30) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -3.2e-236) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (x <= 1.22e-88) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (x <= 1.8e-57) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 5.1e+105) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -7.4e-30:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= -3.2e-236:
		tmp = t * a
	elif x <= 1.22e-88:
		tmp = y * z
	elif x <= 1.8e-57:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 5.1e+105:
		tmp = t * a
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -7.4e-30)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -3.2e-236)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	elseif (x <= 1.22e-88)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (x <= 1.8e-57)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 5.1e+105)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -7.4e-30)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -3.2e-236)
		tmp = t * a;
	elseif (x <= 1.22e-88)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (x <= 1.8e-57)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 5.1e+105)
		tmp = t * a;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[x, -7.4e-30], x, If[LessEqual[x, -3.2e-236], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.22e-88], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.8e-57], x, If[LessEqual[x, 5.1e+105], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], x]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -7.4000000000000006e-30 or 1.2200000000000001e-88 < x < 1.8000000000000001e-57 or 5.09999999999999991e105 < x

   1. Initial program 92.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 66.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -7.4000000000000006e-30 < x < -3.2e-236 or 1.8000000000000001e-57 < x < 5.09999999999999991e105

   1. Initial program 91.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 92.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 55.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 47.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -3.2e-236 < x < 1.2200000000000001e-88

   1. Initial program 90.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 94.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 94.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 88.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 90.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 49.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 49.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   10. Simplified 49.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-236}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.22 \cdot 10^{-88}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{+105}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 39.1% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-88}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{+105}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.06e-29)
   x
   (if (<= x -8.8e-243)
     (* t a)
     (if (<= x 3.3e-88) (* y z) (if (<= x 1.85e+105) (* a (* z b)) x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.06e-29) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -8.8e-243) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (x <= 3.3e-88) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (x <= 1.85e+105) {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.06d-29)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= (-8.8d-243)) then
        tmp = t * a
    else if (x <= 3.3d-88) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (x <= 1.85d+105) then
        tmp = a * (z * b)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.06e-29) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -8.8e-243) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (x <= 3.3e-88) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (x <= 1.85e+105) {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.06e-29:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= -8.8e-243:
		tmp = t * a
	elif x <= 3.3e-88:
		tmp = y * z
	elif x <= 1.85e+105:
		tmp = a * (z * b)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.06e-29)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -8.8e-243)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	elseif (x <= 3.3e-88)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (x <= 1.85e+105)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(z * b));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.06e-29)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -8.8e-243)
		tmp = t * a;
	elseif (x <= 3.3e-88)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (x <= 1.85e+105)
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.06e-29], x, If[LessEqual[x, -8.8e-243], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 3.3e-88], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.85e+105], N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if x < -1.05999999999999995e-29 or 1.84999999999999992e105 < x

   1. Initial program 92.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 67.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.05999999999999995e-29 < x < -8.7999999999999996e-243

   1. Initial program 95.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 58.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 53.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -8.7999999999999996e-243 < x < 3.29999999999999994e-88

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 94.5%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 89.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 90.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 48.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 48.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   10. Simplified 48.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if 3.29999999999999994e-88 < x < 1.84999999999999992e105

   1. Initial program 86.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 97.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 97.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 97.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-out 97.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative 97.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. remove-double-neg 97.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 97.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 37.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 37.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot b\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 37.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 48.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-88}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{+105}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 93.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-42} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + t \cdot a\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.9e-42) (not (<= z 9.2e-11)))
   (* z (+ y (+ (/ x z) (* a (+ b (/ t z))))))
   (+ x (+ (* a (* z b)) (* t a)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.9e-42) || !(z <= 9.2e-11)) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((a * (z * b)) + (t * a));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.9d-42)) .or. (.not. (z <= 9.2d-11))) then
        tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
    else
        tmp = x + ((a * (z * b)) + (t * a))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.9e-42) || !(z <= 9.2e-11)) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((a * (z * b)) + (t * a));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.9e-42) or not (z <= 9.2e-11):
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((a * (z * b)) + (t * a))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.9e-42) || !(z <= 9.2e-11))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(Float64(x / z) + Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(t / z))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(a * Float64(z * b)) + Float64(t * a)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.9e-42) || ~((z <= 9.2e-11)))
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	else
		tmp = x + ((a * (z * b)) + (t * a));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.9e-42], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9.2e-11]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y + N[(N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(b + N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.90000000000000009e-42 or 9.20000000000000054e-11 < z

   1. Initial program 84.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 95.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 95.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 98.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.90000000000000009e-42 < z < 9.20000000000000054e-11

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-42} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + t \cdot a\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 62.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+206}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* y z))))
   (if (<= z -5.4e-42)
     t_1
     (if (<= z 2.7e+126)
       (+ x (* t a))
       (if (<= z 1.1e+206) (* a (* z b)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = x + (y * z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.4e-42) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 2.7e+126) {
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	} else if (z <= 1.1e+206) {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x + (y * z)
    if (z <= (-5.4d-42)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z <= 2.7d+126) then
        tmp = x + (t * a)
    else if (z <= 1.1d+206) then
        tmp = a * (z * b)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = x + (y * z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.4e-42) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 2.7e+126) {
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	} else if (z <= 1.1e+206) {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = x + (y * z)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.4e-42:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z <= 2.7e+126:
		tmp = x + (t * a)
	elif z <= 1.1e+206:
		tmp = a * (z * b)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(y * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.4e-42)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 2.7e+126)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t * a));
	elseif (z <= 1.1e+206)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(z * b));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = x + (y * z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.4e-42)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 2.7e+126)
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	elseif (z <= 1.1e+206)
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -5.4e-42], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 2.7e+126], N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.1e+206], N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -5.39999999999999998e-42 or 1.10000000000000001e206 < z

   1. Initial program 82.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 82.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 84.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 56.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 56.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   8. Simplified 56.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   if -5.39999999999999998e-42 < z < 2.70000000000000002e126

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

   if 2.70000000000000002e126 < z < 1.10000000000000001e206

   1. Initial program 78.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 78.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 78.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 78.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 78.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 78.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 78.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 89.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 89.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 89.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-out 89.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative 89.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. remove-double-neg 89.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 89.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 78.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 63.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot b\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+206}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 59.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+129}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{+210}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.1e+129)
   (* y z)
   (if (<= z 7e+130)
     (+ x (* t a))
     (if (<= z 1.12e+210) (* a (* z b)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e+129) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 7e+130) {
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	} else if (z <= 1.12e+210) {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.1d+129)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (z <= 7d+130) then
        tmp = x + (t * a)
    else if (z <= 1.12d+210) then
        tmp = a * (z * b)
    else
        tmp = y * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e+129) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 7e+130) {
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	} else if (z <= 1.12e+210) {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.1e+129:
		tmp = y * z
	elif z <= 7e+130:
		tmp = x + (t * a)
	elif z <= 1.12e+210:
		tmp = a * (z * b)
	else:
		tmp = y * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.1e+129)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (z <= 7e+130)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t * a));
	elseif (z <= 1.12e+210)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(z * b));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.1e+129)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (z <= 7e+130)
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	elseif (z <= 1.12e+210)
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	else
		tmp = y * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.1e+129], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 7e+130], N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.12e+210], N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -3.1e129 or 1.12000000000000005e210 < z

   1. Initial program 75.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 75.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 77.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 94.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 59.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 59.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   10. Simplified 59.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -3.1e129 < z < 7.0000000000000002e130

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

   if 7.0000000000000002e130 < z < 1.12000000000000005e210

   1. Initial program 74.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 74.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 74.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 74.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 79.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 79.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 79.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-out 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. remove-double-neg 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 59.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot b\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 59.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+129}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{+210}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 81.7% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-188} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-97}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -2.6e-188) (not (<= a 3.5e-97)))
   (+ x (* a (+ t (* z b))))
   (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -2.6e-188) || !(a <= 3.5e-97)) {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-2.6d-188)) .or. (.not. (a <= 3.5d-97))) then
        tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -2.6e-188) || !(a <= 3.5e-97)) {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -2.6e-188) or not (a <= 3.5e-97):
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -2.6e-188) || !(a <= 3.5e-97))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -2.6e-188) || ~((a <= 3.5e-97)))
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -2.6e-188], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 3.5e-97]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -2.6000000000000001e-188 or 3.50000000000000019e-97 < a

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 88.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 88.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 88.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-out 96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative 96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. remove-double-neg 96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right) \]

   if -2.6000000000000001e-188 < a < 3.50000000000000019e-97

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 85.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 85.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   8. Simplified 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-188} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-97}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 84.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+179}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t \cdot a + y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b -1.4e+179)
   (* z (+ y (+ (/ x z) (* a b))))
   (if (<= b 2.1e+38) (+ x (+ (* t a) (* y z))) (+ x (* a (+ t (* z b)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -1.4e+179) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * b)));
	} else if (b <= 2.1e+38) {
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (b <= (-1.4d+179)) then
        tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * b)))
    else if (b <= 2.1d+38) then
        tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -1.4e+179) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * b)));
	} else if (b <= 2.1e+38) {
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if b <= -1.4e+179:
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * b)))
	elif b <= 2.1e+38:
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -1.4e+179)
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(Float64(x / z) + Float64(a * b))));
	elseif (b <= 2.1e+38)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(t * a) + Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (b <= -1.4e+179)
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * b)));
	elseif (b <= 2.1e+38)
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, -1.4e+179], N[(z * N[(y + N[(N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[b, 2.1e+38], N[(x + N[(N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if b < -1.4e179

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 90.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 90.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 90.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in b around inf 91.1%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

   if -1.4e179 < b < 2.1e38

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 2.1e38 < b

   1. Initial program 91.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 84.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 84.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 84.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-out 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. remove-double-neg 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+179}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t \cdot a + y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 83.7% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+182}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t \cdot a + y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b -1.95e+182)
   (* z (+ y (* a b)))
   (if (<= b 2.1e+38) (+ x (+ (* t a) (* y z))) (+ x (* a (+ t (* z b)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -1.95e+182) {
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b));
	} else if (b <= 2.1e+38) {
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (b <= (-1.95d+182)) then
        tmp = z * (y + (a * b))
    else if (b <= 2.1d+38) then
        tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -1.95e+182) {
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b));
	} else if (b <= 2.1e+38) {
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if b <= -1.95e+182:
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b))
	elif b <= 2.1e+38:
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -1.95e+182)
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(a * b)));
	elseif (b <= 2.1e+38)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(t * a) + Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (b <= -1.95e+182)
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b));
	elseif (b <= 2.1e+38)
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, -1.95e+182], N[(z * N[(y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[b, 2.1e+38], N[(x + N[(N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if b < -1.9499999999999999e182

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -1.9499999999999999e182 < b < 2.1e38

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 2.1e38 < b

   1. Initial program 91.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 84.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 84.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 84.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-out 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. remove-double-neg 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 91.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+182}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t \cdot a + y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 74.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-35} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{+22}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.2e-35) (not (<= z 6.6e+22)))
   (* z (+ y (* a b)))
   (+ x (* t a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.2e-35) || !(z <= 6.6e+22)) {
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.2d-35)) .or. (.not. (z <= 6.6d+22))) then
        tmp = z * (y + (a * b))
    else
        tmp = x + (t * a)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.2e-35) || !(z <= 6.6e+22)) {
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.2e-35) or not (z <= 6.6e+22):
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b))
	else:
		tmp = x + (t * a)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.2e-35) || !(z <= 6.6e+22))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(a * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t * a));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.2e-35) || ~((z <= 6.6e+22)))
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b));
	else
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.2e-35], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 6.6e+22]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.2000000000000001e-35 or 6.5999999999999996e22 < z

   1. Initial program 83.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 83.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 83.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -1.2000000000000001e-35 < z < 6.5999999999999996e22

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-35} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{+22}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 72.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+48} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{-95}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -1.1e+48) (not (<= a 1.16e-95)))
   (* a (+ t (* z b)))
   (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.1e+48) || !(a <= 1.16e-95)) {
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-1.1d+48)) .or. (.not. (a <= 1.16d-95))) then
        tmp = a * (t + (z * b))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.1e+48) || !(a <= 1.16e-95)) {
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -1.1e+48) or not (a <= 1.16e-95):
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -1.1e+48) || !(a <= 1.16e-95))
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -1.1e+48) || ~((a <= 1.16e-95)))
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -1.1e+48], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 1.16e-95]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1.1e48 or 1.15999999999999997e-95 < a

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 84.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 84.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 84.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 95.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 95.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 95.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-out 95.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative 95.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. remove-double-neg 95.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 95.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -1.1e48 < a < 1.15999999999999997e-95

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 91.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 91.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   8. Simplified 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+48} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{-95}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 38.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+105}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.1e-29) x (if (<= x 7.2e+105) (* t a) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.1e-29) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 7.2e+105) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.1d-29)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 7.2d+105) then
        tmp = t * a
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.1e-29) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 7.2e+105) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.1e-29:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 7.2e+105:
		tmp = t * a
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.1e-29)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 7.2e+105)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.1e-29)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 7.2e+105)
		tmp = t * a;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.1e-29], x, If[LessEqual[x, 7.2e+105], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.09999999999999995e-29 or 7.1999999999999998e105 < x

   1. Initial program 92.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 67.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.09999999999999995e-29 < x < 7.1999999999999998e105

   1. Initial program 91.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 47.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 38.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 44.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+105}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 26.3% accurate, 15.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 91.5%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. associate-*l* 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 91.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 56.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 27.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024182 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -11820553527347888000) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 47589743188364287/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))