Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 5.9s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma z 5.0 (* x (+ z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(z, 5.0, (x * (z + y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(z, 5.0, Float64(x * Float64(z + y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * 5.0 + N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 60.7% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+279}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-73}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-27}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+31} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+228}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -7e+279)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= x -6.8e+64)
     (* z x)
     (if (<= x -5.8e-73)
       (* x y)
       (if (<= x 1.05e-27)
         (* z 5.0)
         (if (or (<= x 2.1e+31) (not (<= x 2.6e+228))) (* x y) (* z x)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7e+279) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= -6.8e+64) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if (x <= -5.8e-73) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 1.05e-27) {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	} else if ((x <= 2.1e+31) || !(x <= 2.6e+228)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-7d+279)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= (-6.8d+64)) then
        tmp = z * x
    else if (x <= (-5.8d-73)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= 1.05d-27) then
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    else if ((x <= 2.1d+31) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.6d+228))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7e+279) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= -6.8e+64) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if (x <= -5.8e-73) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 1.05e-27) {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	} else if ((x <= 2.1e+31) || !(x <= 2.6e+228)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -7e+279:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= -6.8e+64:
		tmp = z * x
	elif x <= -5.8e-73:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= 1.05e-27:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	elif (x <= 2.1e+31) or not (x <= 2.6e+228):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -7e+279)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= -6.8e+64)
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	elseif (x <= -5.8e-73)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= 1.05e-27)
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	elseif ((x <= 2.1e+31) || !(x <= 2.6e+228))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -7e+279)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= -6.8e+64)
		tmp = z * x;
	elseif (x <= -5.8e-73)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= 1.05e-27)
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	elseif ((x <= 2.1e+31) || ~((x <= 2.6e+228)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -7e+279], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -6.8e+64], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -5.8e-73], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.05e-27], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[x, 2.1e+31], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.6e+228]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -7.00000000000000003e279 or -6.8000000000000003e64 < x < -5.8e-73 or 1.05000000000000008e-27 < x < 2.09999999999999979e31 or 2.60000000000000007e228 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -7.00000000000000003e279 < x < -6.8000000000000003e64 or 2.09999999999999979e31 < x < 2.60000000000000007e228

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 63.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z + x \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 63.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z + 5 \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 63.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + 5\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 63.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + 5\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 63.3%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -5.8e-73 < x < 1.05000000000000008e-27

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]

   7. Simplified 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+279}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-73}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-27}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+31} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+228}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3700000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5 + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3700000.0) (not (<= x 5.2e-19)))
   (* x (+ z y))
   (+ (* z 5.0) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3700000.0) || !(x <= 5.2e-19)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3700000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 5.2d-19))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = (z * 5.0d0) + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3700000.0) || !(x <= 5.2e-19)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3700000.0) or not (x <= 5.2e-19):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3700000.0) || !(x <= 5.2e-19))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * 5.0) + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3700000.0) || ~((x <= 5.2e-19)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3700000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5.2e-19]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.7e6 or 5.20000000000000026e-19 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   if -3.7e6 < x < 5.20000000000000026e-19

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \cdot 5 \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3700000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5 + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 78.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{-69} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{+123}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -8.8e-69) (not (<= z 2.35e+123)))
   (* z (+ 5.0 x))
   (* x (+ z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8.8e-69) || !(z <= 2.35e+123)) {
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-8.8d-69)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.35d+123))) then
        tmp = z * (5.0d0 + x)
    else
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8.8e-69) || !(z <= 2.35e+123)) {
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -8.8e-69) or not (z <= 2.35e+123):
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x)
	else:
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -8.8e-69) || !(z <= 2.35e+123))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(5.0 + x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -8.8e-69) || ~((z <= 2.35e+123)))
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x);
	else
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -8.8e-69], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.35e+123]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(5.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8.8000000000000001e-69 or 2.3499999999999999e123 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z + x \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z + 5 \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 88.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + 5\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + 5\right)} \]

   if -8.8000000000000001e-69 < z < 2.3499999999999999e123

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{-69} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{+123}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 83.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-73} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -8e-73) (not (<= x 2e-38))) (* x (+ z y)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -8e-73) || !(x <= 2e-38)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-8d-73)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2d-38))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -8e-73) || !(x <= 2e-38)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -8e-73) or not (x <= 2e-38):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -8e-73) || !(x <= 2e-38))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -8e-73) || ~((x <= 2e-38)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -8e-73], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2e-38]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -7.99999999999999998e-73 or 1.9999999999999999e-38 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   if -7.99999999999999998e-73 < x < 1.9999999999999999e-38

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 70.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]

   7. Simplified 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-73} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 59.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-73} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.5e-73) (not (<= x 4e-28))) (* x y) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.5e-73) || !(x <= 4e-28)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.5d-73)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4d-28))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.5e-73) || !(x <= 4e-28)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.5e-73) or not (x <= 4e-28):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.5e-73) || !(x <= 4e-28))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.5e-73) || ~((x <= 4e-28)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.5e-73], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4e-28]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.4999999999999998e-73 or 3.99999999999999988e-28 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -3.4999999999999998e-73 < x < 3.99999999999999988e-28

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]

   7. Simplified 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-73} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(z + y\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ z y)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(z + y)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(z + y\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 41.9% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 44.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + 5\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ x 5.0) z) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x + 5.0d0) * z) + (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + 5.0) * z) + Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024181 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ (* (+ x 5) z) (* x y)))

  (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))