Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 95.5% → 97.8%

Time: 7.6s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 0.4×

• 40.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.8% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma a b (fma x y (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, (z * t))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, Float64(z * t))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(a * b + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ t_2 := c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + t\_1\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))) (t_2 (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) t_1))))
   (if (<= t_2 INFINITY) t_2 t_1)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double t_2 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + t_1);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double t_2 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + t_1);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	t_2 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + t_1)
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_2
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_2;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	t_2 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + t_1);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_2;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, Infinity], t$95$2, t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 36.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 36.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 63.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 63.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 63.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 36.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 65.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* a b) (* c i))))
   (if (<= (* c i) -3.7e+126)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* c i) -2.2e-8)
       (+ (* a b) (* z t))
       (if (<= (* c i) 1.6e+55) (+ (* x y) (* z t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -3.7e+126) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -2.2e-8) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1.6e+55) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i)
    if ((c * i) <= (-3.7d+126)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((c * i) <= (-2.2d-8)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else if ((c * i) <= 1.6d+55) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -3.7e+126) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -2.2e-8) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1.6e+55) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i)
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -3.7e+126:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (c * i) <= -2.2e-8:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	elif (c * i) <= 1.6e+55:
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -3.7e+126)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= -2.2e-8)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 1.6e+55)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -3.7e+126)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((c * i) <= -2.2e-8)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	elseif ((c * i) <= 1.6e+55)
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -3.7e+126], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -2.2e-8], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 1.6e+55], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -3.6999999999999998e126 or 1.6000000000000001e55 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + c \cdot i} \]

   if -3.6999999999999998e126 < (*.f64 c i) < -2.1999999999999998e-8

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 71.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -2.1999999999999998e-8 < (*.f64 c i) < 1.6000000000000001e55

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 95.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{+128} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+145}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -3.2e+128) (not (<= (* c i) 5.5e+145)))
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.2e+128) || !((c * i) <= 5.5e+145)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-3.2d+128)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 5.5d+145))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.2e+128) || !((c * i) <= 5.5e+145)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -3.2e+128) or not ((c * i) <= 5.5e+145):
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -3.2e+128) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 5.5e+145))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.2e+128) || ~(((c * i) <= 5.5e+145)))
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -3.2e+128], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 5.5e+145]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -3.19999999999999986e128 or 5.4999999999999995e145 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + c \cdot i} \]

   if -3.19999999999999986e128 < (*.f64 c i) < 5.4999999999999995e145

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{+128} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+145}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 87.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (* c i) -9e+127)
     (+ (* x y) (+ (* a b) (* c i)))
     (if (<= (* c i) 4.5e+31) (+ (* a b) t_1) (+ (* c i) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -9e+127) {
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	} else if ((c * i) <= 4.5e+31) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
    if ((c * i) <= (-9d+127)) then
        tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i))
    else if ((c * i) <= 4.5d+31) then
        tmp = (a * b) + t_1
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -9e+127) {
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	} else if ((c * i) <= 4.5e+31) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -9e+127:
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i))
	elif (c * i) <= 4.5e+31:
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -9e+127)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i)));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 4.5e+31)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -9e+127)
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	elseif ((c * i) <= 4.5e+31)
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -9e+127], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 4.5e+31], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -9.00000000000000068e127

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   if -9.00000000000000068e127 < (*.f64 c i) < 4.4999999999999996e31

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 4.4999999999999996e31 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 92.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 82.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 86.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (* c i) -5.5e+124)
     (+ (* a b) (* c i))
     (if (<= (* c i) 5.6e+31) (+ (* a b) t_1) (+ (* c i) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -5.5e+124) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 5.6e+31) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
    if ((c * i) <= (-5.5d+124)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else if ((c * i) <= 5.6d+31) then
        tmp = (a * b) + t_1
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -5.5e+124) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 5.6e+31) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -5.5e+124:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	elif (c * i) <= 5.6e+31:
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -5.5e+124)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 5.6e+31)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -5.5e+124)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	elseif ((c * i) <= 5.6e+31)
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -5.5e+124], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 5.6e+31], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -5.49999999999999977e124

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + c \cdot i} \]

   if -5.49999999999999977e124 < (*.f64 c i) < 5.60000000000000034e31

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 5.60000000000000034e31 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 92.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 82.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 42.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 1.68 \cdot 10^{-223}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -2.6e+126)
   (* c i)
   (if (<= (* c i) 1.68e-223)
     (* a b)
     (if (<= (* c i) 3.9e+55) (* z t) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -2.6e+126) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1.68e-223) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 3.9e+55) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-2.6d+126)) then
        tmp = c * i
    else if ((c * i) <= 1.68d-223) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((c * i) <= 3.9d+55) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = c * i
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -2.6e+126) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1.68e-223) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 3.9e+55) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -2.6e+126:
		tmp = c * i
	elif (c * i) <= 1.68e-223:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (c * i) <= 3.9e+55:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = c * i
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -2.6e+126)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 1.68e-223)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 3.9e+55)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -2.6e+126)
		tmp = c * i;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 1.68e-223)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 3.9e+55)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = c * i;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -2.6e+126], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 1.68e-223], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 3.9e+55], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -2.6e126 or 3.90000000000000027e55 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 65.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -2.6e126 < (*.f64 c i) < 1.68000000000000005e-223

   1. Initial program 96.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 39.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if 1.68000000000000005e-223 < (*.f64 c i) < 3.90000000000000027e55

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 63.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 48.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 1.68 \cdot 10^{-223}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 64.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.25 \cdot 10^{-75} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+107}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -4.25e-75) (not (<= (* x y) 8.5e+107)))
   (+ (* x y) (* c i))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.25e-75) || !((x * y) <= 8.5e+107)) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-4.25d-75)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 8.5d+107))) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.25e-75) || !((x * y) <= 8.5e+107)) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -4.25e-75) or not ((x * y) <= 8.5e+107):
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -4.25e-75) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 8.5e+107))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.25e-75) || ~(((x * y) <= 8.5e+107)))
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4.25e-75], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 8.5e+107]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.2500000000000001e-75 or 8.4999999999999999e107 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 85.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 70.2%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -4.2500000000000001e-75 < (*.f64 x y) < 8.4999999999999999e107

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 73.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.25 \cdot 10^{-75} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+107}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 64.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+124} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -2.6e+124) (not (<= (* c i) 2.6e+55)))
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -2.6e+124) || !((c * i) <= 2.6e+55)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-2.6d+124)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 2.6d+55))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -2.6e+124) || !((c * i) <= 2.6e+55)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -2.6e+124) or not ((c * i) <= 2.6e+55):
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -2.6e+124) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 2.6e+55))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -2.6e+124) || ~(((c * i) <= 2.6e+55)))
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -2.6e+124], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 2.6e+55]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -2.6e124 or 2.6e55 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + c \cdot i} \]

   if -2.6e124 < (*.f64 c i) < 2.6e55

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 66.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+124} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 62.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{+238} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+220}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -2.1e+238) (not (<= (* x y) 1.3e+220)))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2.1e+238) || !((x * y) <= 1.3e+220)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-2.1d+238)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 1.3d+220))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2.1e+238) || !((x * y) <= 1.3e+220)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -2.1e+238) or not ((x * y) <= 1.3e+220):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -2.1e+238) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1.3e+220))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -2.1e+238) || ~(((x * y) <= 1.3e+220)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2.1e+238], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.3e+220]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2.10000000000000007e238 or 1.29999999999999997e220 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 81.0%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -2.10000000000000007e238 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.29999999999999997e220

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 57.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{+238} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+220}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 42.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+124} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -3.8e+124) (not (<= (* c i) 1.55e+46))) (* c i) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.8e+124) || !((c * i) <= 1.55e+46)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-3.8d+124)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 1.55d+46))) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.8e+124) || !((c * i) <= 1.55e+46)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -3.8e+124) or not ((c * i) <= 1.55e+46):
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -3.8e+124) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 1.55e+46))
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.8e+124) || ~(((c * i) <= 1.55e+46)))
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -3.8e+124], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 1.55e+46]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -3.7999999999999998e124 or 1.54999999999999988e46 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 92.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 63.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -3.7999999999999998e124 < (*.f64 c i) < 1.54999999999999988e46

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 32.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+124} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 26.9% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 27.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024181 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))