Numeric.SpecFunctions:incompleteGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 9.6s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z) (log t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * Math.log(y)) - y) - z) + Math.log(t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * math.log(y)) - y) - z) + math.log(t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z) (log t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * Math.log(y)) - y) - z) + Math.log(t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * math.log(y)) - y) - z) + math.log(t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z) (log t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * Math.log(y)) - y) - z) + Math.log(t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * math.log(y)) - y) - z) + math.log(t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 88.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 0.00017:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot \log y + \log t\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 0.00017) (- (+ (* x (log y)) (log t)) z) (- (log t) (+ y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 0.00017) {
		tmp = ((x * log(y)) + log(t)) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 0.00017d0) then
        tmp = ((x * log(y)) + log(t)) - z
    else
        tmp = log(t) - (y + z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 0.00017) {
		tmp = ((x * Math.log(y)) + Math.log(t)) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 0.00017:
		tmp = ((x * math.log(y)) + math.log(t)) - z
	else:
		tmp = math.log(t) - (y + z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 0.00017)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + log(t)) - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(t) - Float64(y + z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 0.00017)
		tmp = ((x * log(y)) + log(t)) - z;
	else
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 0.00017], N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] - N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.7e-4

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log t + x \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

   if 1.7e-4 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - \left(y + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 0.00017:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot \log y + \log t\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 88.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+149} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+76}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.9e+149) (not (<= x 5e+76)))
   (- (* x (log y)) z)
   (- (log t) (+ y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.9e+149) || !(x <= 5e+76)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.9d+149)) .or. (.not. (x <= 5d+76))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - z
    else
        tmp = log(t) - (y + z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.9e+149) || !(x <= 5e+76)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.9e+149) or not (x <= 5e+76):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - z
	else:
		tmp = math.log(t) - (y + z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.9e+149) || !(x <= 5e+76))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(t) - Float64(y + z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.9e+149) || ~((x <= 5e+76)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - z;
	else
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.9e+149], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5e+76]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] - N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.9e149 or 4.99999999999999991e76 < x

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

      2. associate--l- 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 91.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -1.9e149 < x < 4.99999999999999991e76

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - \left(y + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+149} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+76}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 90.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+89} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+33}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.3e+89) (not (<= x 1.6e+33)))
   (- (* x (log y)) y)
   (- (log t) (+ y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.3e+89) || !(x <= 1.6e+33)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - y;
	} else {
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.3d+89)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.6d+33))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - y
    else
        tmp = log(t) - (y + z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.3e+89) || !(x <= 1.6e+33)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.3e+89) or not (x <= 1.6e+33):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - y
	else:
		tmp = math.log(t) - (y + z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.3e+89) || !(x <= 1.6e+33))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(t) - Float64(y + z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.3e+89) || ~((x <= 1.6e+33)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - y;
	else
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.3e+89], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.6e+33]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] - N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.2999999999999999e89 or 1.60000000000000009e33 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

      2. associate--l- 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -2.2999999999999999e89 < x < 1.60000000000000009e33

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - \left(y + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+89} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+33}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 83.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+150} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+131}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.35e+150) (not (<= x 3.2e+131)))
   (* x (log y))
   (- (log t) (+ y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.35e+150) || !(x <= 3.2e+131)) {
		tmp = x * log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.35d+150)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.2d+131))) then
        tmp = x * log(y)
    else
        tmp = log(t) - (y + z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.35e+150) || !(x <= 3.2e+131)) {
		tmp = x * Math.log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.35e+150) or not (x <= 3.2e+131):
		tmp = x * math.log(y)
	else:
		tmp = math.log(t) - (y + z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.35e+150) || !(x <= 3.2e+131))
		tmp = Float64(x * log(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(t) - Float64(y + z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.35e+150) || ~((x <= 3.2e+131)))
		tmp = x * log(y);
	else
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.35e+150], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.2e+131]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] - N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.35000000000000004e150 or 3.2000000000000002e131 < x

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

      2. associate--l- 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - \color{blue}{y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} \]

   if -1.35000000000000004e150 < x < 3.2000000000000002e131

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - \left(y + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+150} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+131}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 59.6% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+62} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+53}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.2e+62) (not (<= z 9e+53))) (- z) (- (log t) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.2e+62) || !(z <= 9e+53)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = log(t) - y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.2d+62)) .or. (.not. (z <= 9d+53))) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = log(t) - y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.2e+62) || !(z <= 9e+53)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(t) - y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.2e+62) or not (z <= 9e+53):
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = math.log(t) - y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.2e+62) || !(z <= 9e+53))
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(t) - y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.2e+62) || ~((z <= 9e+53)))
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = log(t) - y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.2e+62], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9e+53]], $MachinePrecision]], (-z), N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.2e62 or 9.0000000000000004e53 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log t + x \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 71.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   8. Simplified 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   if -1.2e62 < z < 9.0000000000000004e53

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 62.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} + \log t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 62.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

   7. Simplified 62.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 62.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t + -1 \cdot y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 62.2%

         \[\leadsto \log t + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 62.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - y} \]

   10. Simplified 62.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+62} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+53}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 47.2% accurate, 17.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+62} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3.7e+62) (not (<= z 1.9e+50))) (- z) (- y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.7e+62) || !(z <= 1.9e+50)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-3.7d+62)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.9d+50))) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = -y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.7e+62) || !(z <= 1.9e+50)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -3.7e+62) or not (z <= 1.9e+50):
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = -y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3.7e+62) || !(z <= 1.9e+50))
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -3.7e+62) || ~((z <= 1.9e+50)))
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = -y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3.7e+62], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.9e+50]], $MachinePrecision]], (-z), (-y)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.70000000000000014e62 or 1.89999999999999994e50 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log t + x \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 70.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   8. Simplified 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   if -3.70000000000000014e62 < z < 1.89999999999999994e50

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 62.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} + \log t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 62.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

   7. Simplified 62.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 43.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 43.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]

   10. Simplified 43.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 55.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+62} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 29.4% accurate, 104.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -y

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-y)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

   2. associate--l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

   3. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 40.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} + \log t \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 40.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

7. Simplified 40.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 29.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 29.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]

10. Simplified 29.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024181 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:incompleteGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z) (log t)))