Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 4.9s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* 3.0 (* x y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (3.0d0 * (x * y)) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(3.0 * Float64(x * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(3.0 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} - z \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 70.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-77} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 10^{+46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.35e-77) (not (<= z 1e+46))) (- z) (* 3.0 (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.35e-77) || !(z <= 1e+46)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.35d-77)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1d+46))) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = 3.0d0 * (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.35e-77) || !(z <= 1e+46)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.35e-77) or not (z <= 1e+46):
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.35e-77) || !(z <= 1e+46))
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(3.0 * Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.35e-77) || ~((z <= 1e+46)))
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.35e-77], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1e+46]], $MachinePrecision]], (-z), N[(3.0 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.35e-77 or 9.9999999999999999e45 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 72.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   7. Simplified 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   if -1.35e-77 < z < 9.9999999999999999e45

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + 3 \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot x + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(3, x, -1 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(3, x, \color{blue}{-\frac{z}{y}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 99.7%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(3, x, \color{blue}{\frac{z}{-y}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(3, x, \frac{z}{-y}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 81.3%

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 81.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(y \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-77} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 10^{+46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 50.3% accurate, 3.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := (-z)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 49.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 49.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

7. Simplified 49.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 2.3% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 49.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 49.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

7. Simplified 49.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-sub0 49.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - z} \]

   2. sub-neg 49.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + \left(-z\right)} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 28.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-z} \cdot \sqrt{-z}} \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 17.8%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}} \]

   5. sqr-neg 17.8%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot z}} \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 1.1%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}} \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 2.1%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{z} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 2.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + z} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. +-lft-identity 2.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

11. Simplified 2.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (* 3.0 y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (3.0d0 * y)) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(3.0 * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(3.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024181 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- (* x (* 3 y)) z))

  (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))