Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 89.5% → 96.6%

Time: 14.9s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 0.5×

• 47.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 89.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_2 - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)}{x} + y \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (- t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- t_2 (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* x (+ (* -2.0 (/ (* c (* t_1 i)) x)) (* y 2.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * ((-2.0 * ((c * (t_1 * i)) / x)) + (y * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * ((-2.0 * ((c * (t_1 * i)) / x)) + (y * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= math.inf:
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = x * ((-2.0 * ((c * (t_1 * i)) / x)) + (y * 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_2 - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_2 - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(Float64(-2.0 * Float64(Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)) / x)) + Float64(y * 2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = x * ((-2.0 * ((c * (t_1 * i)) / x)) + (y * 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$2 - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$2 - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(N[(-2.0 * N[(N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 94.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 94.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 41.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{x} + 2 \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}{x} + y \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.0% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(t\_2 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+248}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - t\_2\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)))
   (if (or (<= t_2 (- INFINITY)) (not (<= t_2 4e+248)))
     (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i)))
     (* (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) t_2) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -((double) INFINITY)) || !(t_2 <= 4e+248)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) || !(t_2 <= 4e+248)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 <= -math.inf) or not (t_2 <= 4e+248):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	else:
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_2 <= Float64(-Inf)) || !(t_2 <= 4e+248))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 <= -Inf) || ~((t_2 <= 4e+248)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	else
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$2, (-Infinity)], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$2, 4e+248]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -inf.0 or 4.00000000000000018e248 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 74.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 74.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 74.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 87.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 87.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 87.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 87.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 4.00000000000000018e248

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+248}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.1% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+299} \lor \neg \left(t\_2 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+248}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(b \cdot c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)))
   (if (or (<= t_2 -1e+299) (not (<= t_2 4e+248)))
     (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i)))
     (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* c i) (* b c)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -1e+299) || !(t_2 <= 4e+248)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * i) * (b * c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = a + (b * c)
    t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
    if ((t_2 <= (-1d+299)) .or. (.not. (t_2 <= 4d+248))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * (t_1 * i))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * i) * (b * c)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -1e+299) || !(t_2 <= 4e+248)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * i) * (b * c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 <= -1e+299) or not (t_2 <= 4e+248):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * i) * (b * c)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_2 <= -1e+299) || !(t_2 <= 4e+248))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(c * i) * Float64(b * c))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 <= -1e+299) || ~((t_2 <= 4e+248)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * i) * (b * c)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$2, -1e+299], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$2, 4e+248]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] * N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -1.0000000000000001e299 or 4.00000000000000018e248 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 75.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 75.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 75.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 87.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 87.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 87.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.0000000000000001e299 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 4.00000000000000018e248

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 88.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c\right)} \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 88.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot b\right)} \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   9. Simplified 88.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot b\right)} \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+299} \lor \neg \left(\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+248}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(b \cdot c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 86.4% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+299} \lor \neg \left(t\_2 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+248}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)))
   (if (or (<= t_2 -1e+299) (not (<= t_2 4e+248)))
     (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i)))
     (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* i (* c (* b c))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -1e+299) || !(t_2 <= 4e+248)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (c * (b * c))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = a + (b * c)
    t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
    if ((t_2 <= (-1d+299)) .or. (.not. (t_2 <= 4d+248))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * (t_1 * i))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (c * (b * c))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -1e+299) || !(t_2 <= 4e+248)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (c * (b * c))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 <= -1e+299) or not (t_2 <= 4e+248):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (c * (b * c))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_2 <= -1e+299) || !(t_2 <= 4e+248))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(i * Float64(c * Float64(b * c)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 <= -1e+299) || ~((t_2 <= 4e+248)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (c * (b * c))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$2, -1e+299], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$2, 4e+248]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(i * N[(c * N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -1.0000000000000001e299 or 4.00000000000000018e248 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 75.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 75.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 75.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 87.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 87.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 87.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.0000000000000001e299 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 4.00000000000000018e248

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c\right)} \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 88.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot b\right)} \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 88.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\left(c \cdot b\right)} \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+299} \lor \neg \left(\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+248}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 83.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 2000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - t\_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)))
   (if (<= t_2 -2e+50)
     (* 2.0 (- (* z t) (* c (* t_1 i))))
     (if (<= t_2 2000000000000.0)
       (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)
       (* 2.0 (- (* x y) t_2))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -2e+50) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (t_1 * i)));
	} else if (t_2 <= 2000000000000.0) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = a + (b * c)
    t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
    if (t_2 <= (-2d+50)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) - (c * (t_1 * i)))
    else if (t_2 <= 2000000000000.0d0) then
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - t_2)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -2e+50) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (t_1 * i)));
	} else if (t_2 <= 2000000000000.0) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= -2e+50:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (t_1 * i)))
	elif t_2 <= 2000000000000.0:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_2)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= -2e+50)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i))));
	elseif (t_2 <= 2000000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - t_2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= -2e+50)
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (t_1 * i)));
	elseif (t_2 <= 2000000000000.0)
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, -2e+50], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 2000000000000.0], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -2.0000000000000002e50

   1. Initial program 83.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 83.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 83.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 89.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 89.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 89.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.0000000000000002e50 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 2e12

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 2e12 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 81.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 80.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 2000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 96.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_2 - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)}{t} + z \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (- t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- t_2 (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* t (+ (* -2.0 (/ (* c (* t_1 i)) t)) (* z 2.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = t * ((-2.0 * ((c * (t_1 * i)) / t)) + (z * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = t * ((-2.0 * ((c * (t_1 * i)) / t)) + (z * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= math.inf:
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = t * ((-2.0 * ((c * (t_1 * i)) / t)) + (z * 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_2 - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_2 - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(Float64(-2.0 * Float64(Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)) / t)) + Float64(z * 2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = t * ((-2.0 * ((c * (t_1 * i)) / t)) + (z * 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$2 - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$2 - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * N[(N[(-2.0 * N[(N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 94.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 94.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 16.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 16.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 16.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 16.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 58.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(2 \cdot z + 2 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{t}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 75.0%

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \frac{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{t} + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}{t} + z \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 96.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_2 - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (- t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- t_2 (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= math.inf:
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_2 - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_2 - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$2 - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$2 - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 94.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 94.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 16.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 16.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 16.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 16.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 79.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -235000 \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+22}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -235000.0) (not (<= c 1.55e+22)))
   (* 2.0 (- (* z t) (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i))))
   (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -235000.0) || !(c <= 1.55e+22)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-235000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (c <= 1.55d+22))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
    else
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -235000.0) || !(c <= 1.55e+22)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -235000.0) or not (c <= 1.55e+22):
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -235000.0) || !(c <= 1.55e+22))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -235000.0) || ~((c <= 1.55e+22)))
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -235000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 1.55e+22]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -235000 or 1.5500000000000001e22 < c

   1. Initial program 80.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 80.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 80.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 90.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 90.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 90.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -235000 < c < 1.5500000000000001e22

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 93.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 93.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 84.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -235000 \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+22}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 37.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := -2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -4.7 \cdot 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-226}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* -2.0 (* a (* c i)))))
   (if (<= c -4.7e+18)
     t_1
     (if (<= c 4e-226)
       (* t (* z 2.0))
       (if (<= c 1.6e+22) (* x (* y 2.0)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -4.7e+18) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (c <= 4e-226) {
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	} else if (c <= 1.6e+22) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (-2.0d0) * (a * (c * i))
    if (c <= (-4.7d+18)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (c <= 4d-226) then
        tmp = t * (z * 2.0d0)
    else if (c <= 1.6d+22) then
        tmp = x * (y * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -4.7e+18) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (c <= 4e-226) {
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	} else if (c <= 1.6e+22) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = -2.0 * (a * (c * i))
	tmp = 0
	if c <= -4.7e+18:
		tmp = t_1
	elif c <= 4e-226:
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0)
	elif c <= 1.6e+22:
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(a * Float64(c * i)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -4.7e+18)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (c <= 4e-226)
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(z * 2.0));
	elseif (c <= 1.6e+22)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (c <= -4.7e+18)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (c <= 4e-226)
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	elseif (c <= 1.6e+22)
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(-2.0 * N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[c, -4.7e+18], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[c, 4e-226], N[(t * N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[c, 1.6e+22], N[(x * N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if c < -4.7e18 or 1.6e22 < c

   1. Initial program 79.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 79.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 79.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 89.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 89.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 89.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 42.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   if -4.7e18 < c < 3.99999999999999969e-226

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 92.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 92.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 92.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 48.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 48.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 48.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot 2\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. associate-*l* 48.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 48.6%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 48.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]

   if 3.99999999999999969e-226 < c < 1.6e22

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 95.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 95.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 55.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 55.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 55.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 55.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 75.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -4.7 \cdot 10^{+18} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+22}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -4.7e+18) (not (<= c 1.7e+22)))
   (* -2.0 (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i)))
   (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -4.7e+18) || !(c <= 1.7e+22)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-4.7d+18)) .or. (.not. (c <= 1.7d+22))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
    else
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -4.7e+18) || !(c <= 1.7e+22)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -4.7e+18) or not (c <= 1.7e+22):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -4.7e+18) || !(c <= 1.7e+22))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -4.7e+18) || ~((c <= 1.7e+22)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	else
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -4.7e+18], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 1.7e+22]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -4.7e18 or 1.7e22 < c

   1. Initial program 79.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 79.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 79.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 89.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 89.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 89.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -4.7e18 < c < 1.7e22

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 93.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 93.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -4.7 \cdot 10^{+18} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+22}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 58.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{+97} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -2.05e+97) (not (<= c 4.5e+55)))
   (* -2.0 (* a (* c i)))
   (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -2.05e+97) || !(c <= 4.5e+55)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-2.05d+97)) .or. (.not. (c <= 4.5d+55))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (a * (c * i))
    else
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -2.05e+97) || !(c <= 4.5e+55)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -2.05e+97) or not (c <= 4.5e+55):
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -2.05e+97) || !(c <= 4.5e+55))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(a * Float64(c * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -2.05e+97) || ~((c <= 4.5e+55)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	else
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -2.05e+97], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 4.5e+55]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -2.04999999999999994e97 or 4.49999999999999998e55 < c

   1. Initial program 77.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 77.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 77.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 89.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 89.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 89.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 45.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.04999999999999994e97 < c < 4.49999999999999998e55

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 96.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 93.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 93.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 77.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{+97} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 37.3% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-174} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+63}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -1.3e-174) (not (<= t 1.25e+63)))
   (* t (* z 2.0))
   (* x (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -1.3e-174) || !(t <= 1.25e+63)) {
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-1.3d-174)) .or. (.not. (t <= 1.25d+63))) then
        tmp = t * (z * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x * (y * 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -1.3e-174) || !(t <= 1.25e+63)) {
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -1.3e-174) or not (t <= 1.25e+63):
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -1.3e-174) || !(t <= 1.25e+63))
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(z * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -1.3e-174) || ~((t <= 1.25e+63)))
		tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -1.3e-174], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 1.25e+63]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t * N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1.3000000000000001e-174 or 1.25000000000000003e63 < t

   1. Initial program 87.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 87.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 87.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 90.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 90.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 90.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 38.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 38.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 38.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot 2\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. associate-*l* 38.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 38.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 38.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]

   if -1.3000000000000001e-174 < t < 1.25000000000000003e63

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 93.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 93.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 94.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 36.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 36.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 36.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 36.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 37.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-174} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+63}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 29.3% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* t (* z 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return t * (z * 2.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = t * (z * 2.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return t * (z * 2.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return t * (z * 2.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(t * Float64(z * 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = t * (z * 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(t * N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.7%

   \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 89.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 89.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   3. associate-*l* 91.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   4. +-commutative 91.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   5. fma-define 91.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 91.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 31.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 31.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

   2. *-commutative 31.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot 2\right)} \cdot z \]

   3. associate-*l* 31.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 31.2%

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]

7. Simplified 31.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 93.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(c * i))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024181 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (* 2 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

  (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))