Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 7.4s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (fma x 3.0 (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + fma(x, 3.0, (y * 2.0));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + fma(x, 3.0, Float64(y * 2.0)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(x * 3.0 + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

   4. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

   6. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

   7. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]

   8. *-lft-identity 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

   9. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

   10. count-2 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

   11. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

   12. fma-define 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]

   13. metadata-eval 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]

   14. metadata-eval 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]

   15. count-2 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]

   16. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 55.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+145}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.22 \cdot 10^{-129}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.3e+145)
   (+ z x)
   (if (<= z 1.22e-129)
     (+ x (* y 2.0))
     (if (<= z 9.2e+108) (* x 3.0) (+ z x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.3e+145) {
		tmp = z + x;
	} else if (z <= 1.22e-129) {
		tmp = x + (y * 2.0);
	} else if (z <= 9.2e+108) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.3d+145)) then
        tmp = z + x
    else if (z <= 1.22d-129) then
        tmp = x + (y * 2.0d0)
    else if (z <= 9.2d+108) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else
        tmp = z + x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.3e+145) {
		tmp = z + x;
	} else if (z <= 1.22e-129) {
		tmp = x + (y * 2.0);
	} else if (z <= 9.2e+108) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.3e+145:
		tmp = z + x
	elif z <= 1.22e-129:
		tmp = x + (y * 2.0)
	elif z <= 9.2e+108:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	else:
		tmp = z + x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.3e+145)
		tmp = Float64(z + x);
	elseif (z <= 1.22e-129)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 2.0));
	elseif (z <= 9.2e+108)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.3e+145)
		tmp = z + x;
	elseif (z <= 1.22e-129)
		tmp = x + (y * 2.0);
	elseif (z <= 9.2e+108)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	else
		tmp = z + x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.3e+145], N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.22e-129], N[(x + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 9.2e+108], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.3e145 or 9.1999999999999996e108 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{y} + \left(x + z\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]

   if -2.3e145 < z < 1.21999999999999999e-129

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 68.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{y} + \left(x + z\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 60.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot y} \]

   if 1.21999999999999999e-129 < z < 9.1999999999999996e108

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+145}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.22 \cdot 10^{-129}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 52.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-126}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -7.8e+108)
   (+ z x)
   (if (<= z 3.1e-126) (* y 2.0) (if (<= z 1.3e+109) (* x 3.0) (+ z x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7.8e+108) {
		tmp = z + x;
	} else if (z <= 3.1e-126) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 1.3e+109) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-7.8d+108)) then
        tmp = z + x
    else if (z <= 3.1d-126) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (z <= 1.3d+109) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else
        tmp = z + x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7.8e+108) {
		tmp = z + x;
	} else if (z <= 3.1e-126) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 1.3e+109) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -7.8e+108:
		tmp = z + x
	elif z <= 3.1e-126:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif z <= 1.3e+109:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	else:
		tmp = z + x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -7.8e+108)
		tmp = Float64(z + x);
	elseif (z <= 3.1e-126)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (z <= 1.3e+109)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -7.8e+108)
		tmp = z + x;
	elseif (z <= 3.1e-126)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (z <= 1.3e+109)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	else
		tmp = z + x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -7.8e+108], N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.1e-126], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.3e+109], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -7.79999999999999969e108 or 1.2999999999999999e109 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{y} + \left(x + z\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]

   if -7.79999999999999969e108 < z < 3.1000000000000001e-126

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 68.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{y} + \left(x + z\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 61.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 56.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 56.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 2} \]

   9. Simplified 56.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 2} \]

   if 3.1000000000000001e-126 < z < 1.2999999999999999e109

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-126}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 52.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+115}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-126}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.4e+115)
   z
   (if (<= z 2e-126) (* y 2.0) (if (<= z 8.8e+108) (* x 3.0) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.4e+115) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 2e-126) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 8.8e+108) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.4d+115)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (z <= 2d-126) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (z <= 8.8d+108) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.4e+115) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 2e-126) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 8.8e+108) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.4e+115:
		tmp = z
	elif z <= 2e-126:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif z <= 8.8e+108:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.4e+115)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 2e-126)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (z <= 8.8e+108)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.4e+115)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 2e-126)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (z <= 8.8e+108)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.4e+115], z, If[LessEqual[z, 2e-126], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 8.8e+108], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], z]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -3.4000000000000001e115 or 8.8000000000000005e108 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      10. count-2 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]

      15. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -3.4000000000000001e115 < z < 1.9999999999999999e-126

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 67.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{y} + \left(x + z\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 61.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 55.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 55.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 2} \]

   9. Simplified 55.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 2} \]

   if 1.9999999999999999e-126 < z < 8.8000000000000005e108

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+115}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-126}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + x\right) + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.2e+122)
   (+ (+ z x) (* y 2.0))
   (if (<= z 2e+110) (+ x (* 2.0 (+ x y))) (+ z (* x 3.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.2e+122) {
		tmp = (z + x) + (y * 2.0);
	} else if (z <= 2e+110) {
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.2d+122)) then
        tmp = (z + x) + (y * 2.0d0)
    else if (z <= 2d+110) then
        tmp = x + (2.0d0 * (x + y))
    else
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.2e+122) {
		tmp = (z + x) + (y * 2.0);
	} else if (z <= 2e+110) {
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.2e+122:
		tmp = (z + x) + (y * 2.0)
	elif z <= 2e+110:
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y))
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.2e+122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z + x) + Float64(y * 2.0));
	elseif (z <= 2e+110)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.2e+122)
		tmp = (z + x) + (y * 2.0);
	elseif (z <= 2e+110)
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	else
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.2e+122], N[(N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2e+110], N[(x + N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -5.20000000000000015e122

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{y} + \left(x + z\right) \]

   if -5.20000000000000015e122 < z < 2e110

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

   if 2e110 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      10. count-2 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]

      15. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 91.5%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + x\right) + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 84.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+121}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -7.2e+121)
   (+ z (* y 2.0))
   (if (<= z 1.25e+110) (+ x (* 2.0 (+ x y))) (+ z (* x 3.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7.2e+121) {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	} else if (z <= 1.25e+110) {
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-7.2d+121)) then
        tmp = z + (y * 2.0d0)
    else if (z <= 1.25d+110) then
        tmp = x + (2.0d0 * (x + y))
    else
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7.2e+121) {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	} else if (z <= 1.25e+110) {
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -7.2e+121:
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0)
	elif z <= 1.25e+110:
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y))
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -7.2e+121)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0));
	elseif (z <= 1.25e+110)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -7.2e+121)
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	elseif (z <= 1.25e+110)
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	else
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -7.2e+121], N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.25e+110], N[(x + N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -7.19999999999999963e121

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      10. count-2 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-define 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]

      15. count-2 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.4%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -7.19999999999999963e121 < z < 1.24999999999999995e110

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

   if 1.24999999999999995e110 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      10. count-2 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]

      15. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 91.5%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+121}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 85.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -6.2e+74) (not (<= x 6.2e+20)))
   (+ z (* x 3.0))
   (+ z (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.2e+74) || !(x <= 6.2e+20)) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-6.2d+74)) .or. (.not. (x <= 6.2d+20))) then
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    else
        tmp = z + (y * 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.2e+74) || !(x <= 6.2e+20)) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -6.2e+74) or not (x <= 6.2e+20):
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	else:
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -6.2e+74) || !(x <= 6.2e+20))
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -6.2e+74) || ~((x <= 6.2e+20)))
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -6.2e+74], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 6.2e+20]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.20000000000000043e74 or 6.2e20 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-lft-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      10. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]

      15. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.4%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]

   if -6.20000000000000043e74 < x < 6.2e20

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      10. count-2 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-define 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]

      15. count-2 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.3%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 78.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+198} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 10^{+132}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.5e+198) (not (<= x 1e+132))) (* x 3.0) (+ z (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.5e+198) || !(x <= 1e+132)) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.5d+198)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1d+132))) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else
        tmp = z + (y * 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.5e+198) || !(x <= 1e+132)) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.5e+198) or not (x <= 1e+132):
		tmp = x * 3.0
	else:
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.5e+198) || !(x <= 1e+132))
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.5e+198) || ~((x <= 1e+132)))
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	else
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.5e+198], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1e+132]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.5000000000000004e198 or 9.99999999999999991e131 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]

   if -5.5000000000000004e198 < x < 9.99999999999999991e131

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-lft-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      10. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-define 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]

      15. count-2 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 81.5%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+198} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 10^{+132}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 51.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+121}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -6.5e+121) z (if (<= z 1.25e+109) (* x 3.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.5e+121) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 1.25e+109) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-6.5d+121)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (z <= 1.25d+109) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.5e+121) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 1.25e+109) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -6.5e+121:
		tmp = z
	elif z <= 1.25e+109:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -6.5e+121)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 1.25e+109)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -6.5e+121)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 1.25e+109)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -6.5e+121], z, If[LessEqual[z, 1.25e+109], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], z]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.50000000000000019e121 or 1.25e109 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      10. count-2 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]

      15. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 74.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -6.50000000000000019e121 < z < 1.25e109

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 46.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 55.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+121}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* 2.0 (+ x y)) (+ z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (2.0d0 * (x + y)) + (z + x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y)) + Float64(z + x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 33.4% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

   4. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

   6. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

   7. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]

   8. *-lft-identity 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

   9. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

   10. count-2 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

   11. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]

   12. fma-define 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]

   13. metadata-eval 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]

   14. metadata-eval 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]

   15. count-2 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]

   16. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 31.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 8.0% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.4%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{y} + \left(x + z\right) \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 8.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024181 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))