Graphics.Rendering.Chart.Drawing:drawTextsR from Chart-1.5.3

Percentage Accurate: 97.9% → 100.0%

Time: 4.8s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.3×

• 20.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- x 1.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((x - 1.0d0) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- x 1.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((x - 1.0d0) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (+ y z)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + \left(-1\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. metadata-eval 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{-1} \cdot z\right) \]

   5. neg-mul-1 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

   6. associate-+r+ 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

   7. unsub-neg 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) - z} \]

   8. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 61.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+146}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-55} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -2.4e+146)
   (* x z)
   (if (or (<= x -1.3e-55) (not (<= x 3.5e-66))) (* x y) (- z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.4e+146) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if ((x <= -1.3e-55) || !(x <= 3.5e-66)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-2.4d+146)) then
        tmp = x * z
    else if ((x <= (-1.3d-55)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.5d-66))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.4e+146) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if ((x <= -1.3e-55) || !(x <= 3.5e-66)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.4e+146:
		tmp = x * z
	elif (x <= -1.3e-55) or not (x <= 3.5e-66):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.4e+146)
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	elseif ((x <= -1.3e-55) || !(x <= 3.5e-66))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.4e+146)
		tmp = x * z;
	elseif ((x <= -1.3e-55) || ~((x <= 3.5e-66)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -2.4e+146], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.3e-55], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.5e-66]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -2.4000000000000002e146

   1. Initial program 87.9%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 68.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   8. Simplified 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   if -2.4000000000000002e146 < x < -1.2999999999999999e-55 or 3.5e-66 < x

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 59.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.2999999999999999e-55 < x < 3.5e-66

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + \left(-1\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{-1} \cdot z\right) \]

      5. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

      7. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) - z} \]

      8. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} - z \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   8. Simplified 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+146}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-55} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 1e-14))) (* x (+ y z)) (- (* x y) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1e-14)) {
		tmp = x * (y + z);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1d-14))) then
        tmp = x * (y + z)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1e-14)) {
		tmp = x * (y + z);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 1e-14):
		tmp = x * (y + z)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1e-14))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 1e-14)))
		tmp = x * (y + z);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1e-14]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 9.99999999999999999e-15 < x

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -1 < x < 9.99999999999999999e-15

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + \left(-1\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{-1} \cdot z\right) \]

      5. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

      7. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) - z} \]

      8. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} - z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y - z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-53} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-65}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(x + -1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.5e-53) (not (<= x 3.6e-65))) (* x (+ y z)) (* z (+ x -1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.5e-53) || !(x <= 3.6e-65)) {
		tmp = x * (y + z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (x + -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4.5d-53)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.6d-65))) then
        tmp = x * (y + z)
    else
        tmp = z * (x + (-1.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.5e-53) || !(x <= 3.6e-65)) {
		tmp = x * (y + z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (x + -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.5e-53) or not (x <= 3.6e-65):
		tmp = x * (y + z)
	else:
		tmp = z * (x + -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.5e-53) || !(x <= 3.6e-65))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(x + -1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4.5e-53) || ~((x <= 3.6e-65)))
		tmp = x * (y + z);
	else
		tmp = z * (x + -1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.5e-53], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.6e-65]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.49999999999999985e-53 or 3.5999999999999998e-65 < x

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -4.49999999999999985e-53 < x < 3.5999999999999998e-65

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + \left(-1\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{-1} \cdot z\right) \]

      5. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

      7. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) - z} \]

      8. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{z} - z \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-53} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-65}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(x + -1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{-50} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -7.4e-50) (not (<= x 4.5e-64))) (* x (+ y z)) (- z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7.4e-50) || !(x <= 4.5e-64)) {
		tmp = x * (y + z);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-7.4d-50)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4.5d-64))) then
        tmp = x * (y + z)
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7.4e-50) || !(x <= 4.5e-64)) {
		tmp = x * (y + z);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -7.4e-50) or not (x <= 4.5e-64):
		tmp = x * (y + z)
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -7.4e-50) || !(x <= 4.5e-64))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -7.4e-50) || ~((x <= 4.5e-64)))
		tmp = x * (y + z);
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -7.4e-50], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.5e-64]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -7.4000000000000002e-50 or 4.5000000000000001e-64 < x

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -7.4000000000000002e-50 < x < 4.5000000000000001e-64

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + \left(-1\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{-1} \cdot z\right) \]

      5. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

      7. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) - z} \]

      8. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} - z \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   8. Simplified 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{-50} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 61.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.6 \cdot 10^{-51} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-65}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -8.6e-51) (not (<= x 2.3e-65))) (* x y) (- z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -8.6e-51) || !(x <= 2.3e-65)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-8.6d-51)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.3d-65))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -8.6e-51) || !(x <= 2.3e-65)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -8.6e-51) or not (x <= 2.3e-65):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -8.6e-51) || !(x <= 2.3e-65))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -8.6e-51) || ~((x <= 2.3e-65)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -8.6e-51], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.3e-65]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -8.5999999999999995e-51 or 2.3e-65 < x

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 56.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -8.5999999999999995e-51 < x < 2.3e-65

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + \left(-1\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{-1} \cdot z\right) \]

      5. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      6. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

      7. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) - z} \]

      8. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} - z \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   8. Simplified 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.6 \cdot 10^{-51} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-65}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 37.0% accurate, 4.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := (-z)

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + \left(-1\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. metadata-eval 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{-1} \cdot z\right) \]

   5. neg-mul-1 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

   6. associate-+r+ 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

   7. unsub-neg 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) - z} \]

   8. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 77.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} - z \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 38.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 38.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

8. Simplified 38.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 2.6% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + \left(-1\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. metadata-eval 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{-1} \cdot z\right) \]

   5. neg-mul-1 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

   6. associate-+r+ 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

   7. unsub-neg 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) - z} \]

   8. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 77.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} - z \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 38.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 38.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

8. Simplified 38.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-sub0 38.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - z} \]

   2. sub-neg 38.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + \left(-z\right)} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 14.5%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-z} \cdot \sqrt{-z}} \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 15.5%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}} \]

   5. sqr-neg 15.5%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot z}} \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 1.4%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}} \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 2.5%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{z} \]

10. Applied egg-rr 2.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + z} \]
11. Step-by-step derivation

    1. +-lft-identity 2.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

12. Simplified 2.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
13. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024180 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Chart.Drawing:drawTextsR from Chart-1.5.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x y) (* (- x 1.0) z)))