Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 6.2s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma z 5.0 (* x (+ z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(z, 5.0, (x * (z + y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(z, 5.0, Float64(x * Float64(z + y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * 5.0 + N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 61.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+145}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{-56} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -4.8e+145)
   (* z x)
   (if (or (<= x -1.65e-56) (not (<= x 8e-66))) (* x y) (* z 5.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.8e+145) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if ((x <= -1.65e-56) || !(x <= 8e-66)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-4.8d+145)) then
        tmp = z * x
    else if ((x <= (-1.65d-56)) .or. (.not. (x <= 8d-66))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.8e+145) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if ((x <= -1.65e-56) || !(x <= 8e-66)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -4.8e+145:
		tmp = z * x
	elif (x <= -1.65e-56) or not (x <= 8e-66):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -4.8e+145)
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	elseif ((x <= -1.65e-56) || !(x <= 8e-66))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -4.8e+145)
		tmp = z * x;
	elseif ((x <= -1.65e-56) || ~((x <= 8e-66)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -4.8e+145], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.65e-56], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 8e-66]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -4.79999999999999984e145

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]

   if -4.79999999999999984e145 < x < -1.64999999999999992e-56 or 7.9999999999999998e-66 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(5 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x \cdot z}{y} + 5 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 89.6%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{z}{y}} + 5 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 89.9%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\frac{z}{y} \cdot \left(x + 5\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \frac{z}{y} \cdot \left(x + 5\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 59.0%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.64999999999999992e-56 < x < 7.9999999999999998e-66

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 84.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]

   7. Simplified 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+145}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{-56} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5 + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.0) (not (<= x 1e-14))) (* x (+ z y)) (+ (* z 5.0) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.0) || !(x <= 1e-14)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1d-14))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = (z * 5.0d0) + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.0) || !(x <= 1e-14)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.0) or not (x <= 1e-14):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.0) || !(x <= 1e-14))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * 5.0) + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.0) || ~((x <= 1e-14)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1e-14]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5 or 9.99999999999999999e-15 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   if -5 < x < 9.99999999999999999e-15

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \cdot 5 \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5 + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.3 \cdot 10^{-52} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-65}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.3e-52) (not (<= x 3.6e-65))) (* x (+ z y)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.3e-52) || !(x <= 3.6e-65)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4.3d-52)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.6d-65))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.3e-52) || !(x <= 3.6e-65)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.3e-52) or not (x <= 3.6e-65):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.3e-52) || !(x <= 3.6e-65))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4.3e-52) || ~((x <= 3.6e-65)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.3e-52], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.6e-65]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.3000000000000003e-52 or 3.5999999999999998e-65 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   if -4.3000000000000003e-52 < x < 3.5999999999999998e-65

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 84.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]

   7. Simplified 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.3 \cdot 10^{-52} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-65}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 51.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.55 \cdot 10^{-98} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{-67}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.55e-98) (not (<= y 2.25e-67))) (* x y) (* z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.55e-98) || !(y <= 2.25e-67)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.55d-98)) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.25d-67))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.55e-98) || !(y <= 2.25e-67)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.55e-98) or not (y <= 2.25e-67):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.55e-98) || !(y <= 2.25e-67))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.55e-98) || ~((y <= 2.25e-67)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.55e-98], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.25e-67]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.55000000000000011e-98 or 2.25000000000000008e-67 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(5 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.6%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x \cdot z}{y} + 5 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{z}{y}} + 5 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 99.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\frac{z}{y} \cdot \left(x + 5\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \frac{z}{y} \cdot \left(x + 5\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 59.7%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -2.55000000000000011e-98 < y < 2.25000000000000008e-67

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 44.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.55 \cdot 10^{-98} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{-67}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(z + y\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ z y)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(z + y)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(z + y\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 27.9% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* z x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 62.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 26.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]

5. Final simplification 26.2%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot x \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + 5\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ x 5.0) z) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x + 5.0d0) * z) + (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + 5.0) * z) + Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024180 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ (* (+ x 5) z) (* x y)))

  (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))