Logistic function from Lakshay Garg

Percentage Accurate: 54.4% → 99.6%

Time: 8.0s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 18.1×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 54.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\sqrt[3]{-1 + \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}}}\right)}^{3}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.0001:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* -2.0 x) -0.5)
   (pow (cbrt (+ -1.0 (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))))) 3.0)
   (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.0001) (+ x (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0))) -1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.5) {
		tmp = pow(cbrt((-1.0 + (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))))), 3.0);
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0001) {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.5) {
		tmp = Math.pow(Math.cbrt((-1.0 + (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))))), 3.0);
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0001) {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -0.5)
		tmp = cbrt(Float64(-1.0 + Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))))) ^ 3.0;
	elseif (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.0001)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)));
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -0.5], N[Power[N[Power[N[(-1.0 + N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision], 3.0], $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.0001], N[(x + N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -1.0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < -0.5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1}} \]

      2. pow3 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1}\right)}^{3}} \]

      3. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + \left(-1\right)}}\right)}^{3} \]

      4. exp-prod 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}}} + \left(-1\right)}\right)}^{3} \]

      5. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}} + \color{blue}{-1}}\right)}^{3} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + {\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}} + -1}\right)}^{3}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow-exp 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{-2 \cdot x}}} + -1}\right)}^{3} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{x \cdot -2}}} + -1}\right)}^{3} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{x \cdot -2}}} + -1}\right)}^{3} \]

   if -0.5 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < 1.00000000000000005e-4

   1. Initial program 8.5%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \cdot x \]

      3. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot x\right)} \]

      4. unpow2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      5. unpow3 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \color{blue}{{x}^{3}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}} \]

   if 1.00000000000000005e-4 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\sqrt[3]{-1 + \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}}}\right)}^{3}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.0001:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.0001:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* -2.0 x) -0.5)
   (+ -1.0 (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))))
   (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.0001) (+ x (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0))) -1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.5) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x))));
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0001) {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-0.5d0)) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) + (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x))))
    else if (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 0.0001d0) then
        tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333d0) * (x ** 3.0d0))
    else
        tmp = -1.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.5) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x))));
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0001) {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (-2.0 * x) <= -0.5:
		tmp = -1.0 + (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x))))
	elif (-2.0 * x) <= 0.0001:
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0))
	else:
		tmp = -1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -0.5)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 + Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))));
	elseif (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.0001)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)));
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.5)
		tmp = -1.0 + (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x))));
	elseif ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0001)
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0));
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -0.5], N[(-1.0 + N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.0001], N[(x + N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -1.0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < -0.5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -0.5 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < 1.00000000000000005e-4

   1. Initial program 8.5%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \cdot x \]

      3. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot x\right)} \]

      4. unpow2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      5. unpow3 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \color{blue}{{x}^{3}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}} \]

   if 1.00000000000000005e-4 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.0001:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 78.7% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.3 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{2}{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(2 + x \cdot -1.3333333333333333\right) - 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot 2}{x + 2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -6.3e-9)
   (+
    -1.0
    (/ 2.0 (+ 2.0 (* x (- (* x (+ 2.0 (* x -1.3333333333333333))) 2.0)))))
   (/ (* x 2.0) (+ x 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -6.3e-9) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (2.0 / (2.0 + (x * ((x * (2.0 + (x * -1.3333333333333333))) - 2.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-6.3d-9)) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) + (2.0d0 / (2.0d0 + (x * ((x * (2.0d0 + (x * (-1.3333333333333333d0)))) - 2.0d0))))
    else
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) / (x + 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -6.3e-9) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (2.0 / (2.0 + (x * ((x * (2.0 + (x * -1.3333333333333333))) - 2.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -6.3e-9:
		tmp = -1.0 + (2.0 / (2.0 + (x * ((x * (2.0 + (x * -1.3333333333333333))) - 2.0))))
	else:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -6.3e-9)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 + Float64(2.0 / Float64(2.0 + Float64(x * Float64(Float64(x * Float64(2.0 + Float64(x * -1.3333333333333333))) - 2.0)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) / Float64(x + 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -6.3e-9)
		tmp = -1.0 + (2.0 / (2.0 + (x * ((x * (2.0 + (x * -1.3333333333333333))) - 2.0))));
	else
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -6.3e-9], N[(-1.0 + N[(2.0 / N[(2.0 + N[(x * N[(N[(x * N[(2.0 + N[(x * -1.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.3000000000000002e-9

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(2 + -1.3333333333333333 \cdot x\right) - 2\right)}} - 1 \]

   if -6.3000000000000002e-9 < x

   1. Initial program 38.5%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 6.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 6.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-- 6.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

      2. metadata-eval 6.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - \color{blue}{1}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      3. difference-of-sqr-1 6.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 1\right) + 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      4. associate-+l+ 6.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 + 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      5. metadata-eval 6.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + \color{blue}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      6. associate--l+ 67.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 - 1\right)\right)}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      7. metadata-eval 67.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{0}\right)}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      8. +-rgt-identity 67.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      9. associate-+l+ 67.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{\color{blue}{x + \left(1 + 1\right)}} \]

      10. metadata-eval 67.5%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{x + \color{blue}{2}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{x + 2}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}}{x + 2} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 2}}{x + 2} \]

   10. Simplified 71.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 2}}{x + 2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.3 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{2}{2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(2 + x \cdot -1.3333333333333333\right) - 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot 2}{x + 2}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 78.6% accurate, 9.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.68:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot 2}{x + 2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -0.68) -1.0 (/ (* x 2.0) (+ x 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.68) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-0.68d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) / (x + 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.68) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -0.68:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -0.68)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) / Float64(x + 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -0.68)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -0.68], -1.0, N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -0.680000000000000049

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -0.680000000000000049 < x

   1. Initial program 39.3%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 7.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 7.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 7.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-- 7.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

      2. metadata-eval 7.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - \color{blue}{1}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      3. difference-of-sqr-1 7.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 1\right) + 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      4. associate-+l+ 7.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 + 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      5. metadata-eval 7.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + \color{blue}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      6. associate--l+ 67.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 - 1\right)\right)}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      7. metadata-eval 67.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{0}\right)}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      8. +-rgt-identity 67.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      9. associate-+l+ 68.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{\color{blue}{x + \left(1 + 1\right)}} \]

      10. metadata-eval 68.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{x + \color{blue}{2}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 68.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{x + 2}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}}{x + 2} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 2}}{x + 2} \]

   10. Simplified 71.3%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 2}}{x + 2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 75.9% accurate, 18.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -1.0) -1.0 x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.0:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.0], -1.0, x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -1 < x

   1. Initial program 39.3%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 68.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 27.5% accurate, 109.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 51.4%

   \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 23.8%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 23.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

5. Simplified 23.8%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 22.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024177 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Logistic function from Lakshay Garg"
  :precision binary64
  (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))