Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A

Percentage Accurate: 95.9% → 99.9%

Time: 9.5s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 5.8×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ y (- (* 1.1283791670955126 (exp z)) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - (x * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126d0 * exp(z)) - (x * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * Math.exp(z)) - (x * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * math.exp(z)) - (x * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - Float64(x * y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - (x * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ y (- (* 1.1283791670955126 (exp z)) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - (x * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126d0 * exp(z)) - (x * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * Math.exp(z)) - (x * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * math.exp(z)) - (x * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - Float64(x * y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - (x * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 0.0)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (- x (/ y (fma x y (* (exp z) -1.1283791670955126))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / fma(x, y, (exp(z) * -1.1283791670955126)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / fma(x, y, Float64(exp(z) * -1.1283791670955126))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(y / N[(x * y + N[(N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision] * -1.1283791670955126), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 79.7%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 97.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y\right)}}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 97.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}} \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 97.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 97.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{-\left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      6. neg-sub0 97.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      7. associate--r- 97.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      8. neg-sub0 97.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -\color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot \left(-1.1283791670955126\right)}\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-160}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;e^{z} \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 2.4e-160)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (if (<= (exp z) 5.2e+22) (- x (/ y (- (* x y) 1.1283791670955126))) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 2.4e-160) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (exp(z) <= 5.2e+22) {
		tmp = x - (y / ((x * y) - 1.1283791670955126));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(z) <= 2.4d-160) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    else if (exp(z) <= 5.2d+22) then
        tmp = x - (y / ((x * y) - 1.1283791670955126d0))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 2.4e-160) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (Math.exp(z) <= 5.2e+22) {
		tmp = x - (y / ((x * y) - 1.1283791670955126));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 2.4e-160:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	elif math.exp(z) <= 5.2e+22:
		tmp = x - (y / ((x * y) - 1.1283791670955126))
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 2.4e-160)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	elseif (exp(z) <= 5.2e+22)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / Float64(Float64(x * y) - 1.1283791670955126)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(z) <= 2.4e-160)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	elseif (exp(z) <= 5.2e+22)
		tmp = x - (y / ((x * y) - 1.1283791670955126));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 2.4e-160], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 5.2e+22], N[(x - N[(y / N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - 1.1283791670955126), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 2.39999999999999991e-160

   1. Initial program 79.7%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

   if 2.39999999999999991e-160 < (exp.f64 z) < 5.2e22

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y\right)}}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}} \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{-\left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      7. associate--r- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      8. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -\color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot \left(-1.1283791670955126\right)}\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}} \]

   if 5.2e22 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-160}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;e^{z} \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.1% accurate, 5.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.1 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 52:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{\frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.1e+16)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (if (<= z 52.0) (+ x (/ 1.0 (- (/ 1.1283791670955126 y) x))) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.1e+16) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 52.0) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / ((1.1283791670955126 / y) - x));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.1d+16)) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    else if (z <= 52.0d0) then
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / ((1.1283791670955126d0 / y) - x))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.1e+16) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 52.0) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / ((1.1283791670955126 / y) - x));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.1e+16:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	elif z <= 52.0:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / ((1.1283791670955126 / y) - x))
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.1e+16)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	elseif (z <= 52.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 / y) - x)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.1e+16)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	elseif (z <= 52.0)
		tmp = x + (1.0 / ((1.1283791670955126 / y) - x));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.1e+16], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 52.0], N[(x + N[(1.0 / N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 / y), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -5.1e16

   1. Initial program 79.0%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

   if -5.1e16 < z < 52

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y\right)}}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}} \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{-\left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      7. associate--r- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      8. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -\color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot \left(-1.1283791670955126\right)}\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}{y}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}{y}\right)}^{-1}} \]

      3. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} - 1.1283791670955126}{y}\right)}^{-1} \]

      4. div-sub 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot x}{y} - \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y}\right)}}^{-1} \]

      5. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot y}}{y} - \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y}\right)}^{-1} \]

      6. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - {\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{y}} - \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y}\right)}^{-1} \]

      7. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - {\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y}\right)}^{-1} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - {\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} - \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y}\right)}^{-1} \]

      9. *-un-lft-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - {\left(\color{blue}{x} - \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y}\right)}^{-1} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(x - \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{x - \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y}}} \]

   9. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{x - \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y}}} \]

   if 52 < z

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.1 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 52:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{\frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.7% accurate, 7.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-179}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot -0.8862269254527579\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -4.4e-28)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (if (<= z 3.8e-179) (- x (* y -0.8862269254527579)) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4.4e-28) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 3.8e-179) {
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-4.4d-28)) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    else if (z <= 3.8d-179) then
        tmp = x - (y * (-0.8862269254527579d0))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4.4e-28) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 3.8e-179) {
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -4.4e-28:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	elif z <= 3.8e-179:
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -4.4e-28)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	elseif (z <= 3.8e-179)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * -0.8862269254527579));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -4.4e-28)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	elseif (z <= 3.8e-179)
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -4.4e-28], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.8e-179], N[(x - N[(y * -0.8862269254527579), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -4.39999999999999992e-28

   1. Initial program 80.6%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

   if -4.39999999999999992e-28 < z < 3.79999999999999974e-179

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y\right)}}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}} \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{-\left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      7. associate--r- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      8. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -\color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot \left(-1.1283791670955126\right)}\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-0.8862269254527579 \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 76.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579} \]

   8. Simplified 76.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579} \]

   if 3.79999999999999974e-179 < z

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-179}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot -0.8862269254527579\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 72.4% accurate, 7.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-179}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot -0.8862269254527579\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.1e-29) x (if (<= z 3.7e-179) (- x (* y -0.8862269254527579)) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e-29) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 3.7e-179) {
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.1d-29)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (z <= 3.7d-179) then
        tmp = x - (y * (-0.8862269254527579d0))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e-29) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 3.7e-179) {
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.1e-29:
		tmp = x
	elif z <= 3.7e-179:
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.1e-29)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 3.7e-179)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * -0.8862269254527579));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.1e-29)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 3.7e-179)
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.1e-29], x, If[LessEqual[z, 3.7e-179], N[(x - N[(y * -0.8862269254527579), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.10000000000000026e-29 or 3.6999999999999999e-179 < z

   1. Initial program 89.7%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -3.10000000000000026e-29 < z < 3.6999999999999999e-179

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y\right)}}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}} \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{-\left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      7. associate--r- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      8. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -\color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot \left(-1.1283791670955126\right)}\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-0.8862269254527579 \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 76.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579} \]

   8. Simplified 76.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 69.9% accurate, 8.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-270}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-244}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -4.5e-270) x (if (<= x 3.8e-244) (/ y 1.1283791670955126) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.5e-270) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 3.8e-244) {
		tmp = y / 1.1283791670955126;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-4.5d-270)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 3.8d-244) then
        tmp = y / 1.1283791670955126d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.5e-270) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 3.8e-244) {
		tmp = y / 1.1283791670955126;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -4.5e-270:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 3.8e-244:
		tmp = y / 1.1283791670955126
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -4.5e-270)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 3.8e-244)
		tmp = Float64(y / 1.1283791670955126);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -4.5e-270)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 3.8e-244)
		tmp = y / 1.1283791670955126;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -4.5e-270], x, If[LessEqual[x, 3.8e-244], N[(y / 1.1283791670955126), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.49999999999999998e-270 or 3.8000000000000001e-244 < x

   1. Initial program 94.0%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -4.49999999999999998e-270 < x < 3.8000000000000001e-244

   1. Initial program 86.0%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y\right)}}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}} \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{-\left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      6. neg-sub0 86.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      7. associate--r- 86.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      8. neg-sub0 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      10. fma-define 87.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      11. *-commutative 87.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -\color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in 87.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot \left(-1.1283791670955126\right)}\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 87.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 57.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8862269254527579 \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 57.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.8862269254527579} \]

   8. Simplified 57.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.8862269254527579} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 57.6%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1.1283791670955126}} \]

      2. div-inv 57.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126}} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 57.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 69.7% accurate, 8.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-275}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-244}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.8862269254527579\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.85e-275) x (if (<= x 1.95e-244) (* y 0.8862269254527579) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.85e-275) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.95e-244) {
		tmp = y * 0.8862269254527579;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.85d-275)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 1.95d-244) then
        tmp = y * 0.8862269254527579d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.85e-275) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.95e-244) {
		tmp = y * 0.8862269254527579;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.85e-275:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 1.95e-244:
		tmp = y * 0.8862269254527579
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.85e-275)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.95e-244)
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.8862269254527579);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.85e-275)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.95e-244)
		tmp = y * 0.8862269254527579;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.85e-275], x, If[LessEqual[x, 1.95e-244], N[(y * 0.8862269254527579), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.84999999999999985e-275 or 1.9499999999999999e-244 < x

   1. Initial program 94.0%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.84999999999999985e-275 < x < 1.9499999999999999e-244

   1. Initial program 86.0%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y\right)}}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}} \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{-\left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      6. neg-sub0 86.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      7. associate--r- 86.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      8. neg-sub0 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      10. fma-define 87.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      11. *-commutative 87.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -\color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in 87.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot \left(-1.1283791670955126\right)}\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 87.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 57.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8862269254527579 \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 57.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.8862269254527579} \]

   8. Simplified 57.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.8862269254527579} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 68.3% accurate, 111.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.3%

   \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 70.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{1}{\frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} \cdot e^{z} - x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ 1.0 (- (* (/ 1.1283791670955126 y) (exp z)) x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / (((1.1283791670955126 / y) * exp(z)) - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (1.0d0 / (((1.1283791670955126d0 / y) * exp(z)) - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / (((1.1283791670955126 / y) * Math.exp(z)) - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (1.0 / (((1.1283791670955126 / y) * math.exp(z)) - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 / y) * exp(z)) - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (1.0 / (((1.1283791670955126 / y) * exp(z)) - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 / y), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024176 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ x (/ 1 (- (* (/ 5641895835477563/5000000000000000 y) (exp z)) x))))

  (+ x (/ y (- (* 1.1283791670955126 (exp z)) (* x y)))))