Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 69.5% → 98.5%

Time: 12.6s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 4.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 69.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.5% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+267}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      2e+267)
   (fma
    y
    (/
     (fma z (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) 0.279195317918525)
     (fma z (+ z 6.012459259764103) 3.350343815022304))
    x)
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+267) {
		tmp = fma(y, (fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, (z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+267)
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+267], N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 1.9999999999999999e267

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.9999999999999999e267 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 11.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+267}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+267}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      2e+267)
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (/
      (fma (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) z 0.279195317918525)
      (fma (+ z 6.012459259764103) z 3.350343815022304))))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+267) {
		tmp = x + (y * (fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma((z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+267)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+267], N[(x + N[(y * N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 1.9999999999999999e267

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.9999999999999999e267 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 11.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 11.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+267}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+17} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \frac{{z}^{3} + 217.34839618538297}{36.1496663503231 + z \cdot \left(z - 6.012459259764103\right)}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.8e+17) (not (<= z 1.1e+25)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+
    x
    (/
     (*
      y
      (+
       (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
       0.279195317918525))
     (+
      3.350343815022304
      (*
       z
       (/
        (+ (pow z 3.0) 217.34839618538297)
        (+ 36.1496663503231 (* z (- z 6.012459259764103))))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.8e+17) || !(z <= 1.1e+25)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / (3.350343815022304 + (z * ((pow(z, 3.0) + 217.34839618538297) / (36.1496663503231 + (z * (z - 6.012459259764103)))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.8d+17)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.1d+25))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0)) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (3.350343815022304d0 + (z * (((z ** 3.0d0) + 217.34839618538297d0) / (36.1496663503231d0 + (z * (z - 6.012459259764103d0)))))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.8e+17) || !(z <= 1.1e+25)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / (3.350343815022304 + (z * ((Math.pow(z, 3.0) + 217.34839618538297) / (36.1496663503231 + (z * (z - 6.012459259764103)))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.8e+17) or not (z <= 1.1e+25):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / (3.350343815022304 + (z * ((math.pow(z, 3.0) + 217.34839618538297) / (36.1496663503231 + (z * (z - 6.012459259764103)))))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.8e+17) || !(z <= 1.1e+25))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(3.350343815022304 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64((z ^ 3.0) + 217.34839618538297) / Float64(36.1496663503231 + Float64(z * Float64(z - 6.012459259764103))))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.8e+17) || ~((z <= 1.1e+25)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / (3.350343815022304 + (z * (((z ^ 3.0) + 217.34839618538297) / (36.1496663503231 + (z * (z - 6.012459259764103)))))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.8e+17], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.1e+25]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(3.350343815022304 + N[(z * N[(N[(N[Power[z, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] + 217.34839618538297), $MachinePrecision] / N[(36.1496663503231 + N[(z * N[(z - 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.8e17 or 1.1e25 < z

   1. Initial program 34.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 34.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 45.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 45.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 45.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 45.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 45.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 45.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 45.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 45.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

   if -5.8e17 < z < 1.1e25

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(6.012459259764103 + z\right)} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. flip3-+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{{6.012459259764103}^{3} + {z}^{3}}{6.012459259764103 \cdot 6.012459259764103 + \left(z \cdot z - 6.012459259764103 \cdot z\right)}} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\frac{\color{blue}{{z}^{3} + {6.012459259764103}^{3}}}{6.012459259764103 \cdot 6.012459259764103 + \left(z \cdot z - 6.012459259764103 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\frac{{z}^{3} + \color{blue}{217.34839618538297}}{6.012459259764103 \cdot 6.012459259764103 + \left(z \cdot z - 6.012459259764103 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\frac{{z}^{3} + 217.34839618538297}{\color{blue}{36.1496663503231} + \left(z \cdot z - 6.012459259764103 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      6. pow2 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\frac{{z}^{3} + 217.34839618538297}{36.1496663503231 + \left(\color{blue}{{z}^{2}} - 6.012459259764103 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      7. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\frac{{z}^{3} + 217.34839618538297}{36.1496663503231 + \left({z}^{2} - \color{blue}{z \cdot 6.012459259764103}\right)} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{{z}^{3} + 217.34839618538297}{36.1496663503231 + \left({z}^{2} - z \cdot 6.012459259764103\right)}} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\frac{{z}^{3} + 217.34839618538297}{36.1496663503231 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot z} - z \cdot 6.012459259764103\right)} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-out-- 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\frac{{z}^{3} + 217.34839618538297}{36.1496663503231 + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z - 6.012459259764103\right)}} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   6. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{{z}^{3} + 217.34839618538297}{36.1496663503231 + z \cdot \left(z - 6.012459259764103\right)}} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+17} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \frac{{z}^{3} + 217.34839618538297}{36.1496663503231 + z \cdot \left(z - 6.012459259764103\right)}}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+17} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 18500\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 + \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right) + z \cdot 0.4917317610505968\right)\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.8e+17) (not (<= z 18500.0)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+
    x
    (/
     (*
      y
      (+
       0.279195317918525
       (+ (* z (* z 0.0692910599291889)) (* z 0.4917317610505968))))
     (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.8e+17) || !(z <= 18500.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y * (0.279195317918525 + ((z * (z * 0.0692910599291889)) + (z * 0.4917317610505968)))) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.8d+17)) .or. (.not. (z <= 18500.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + ((y * (0.279195317918525d0 + ((z * (z * 0.0692910599291889d0)) + (z * 0.4917317610505968d0)))) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103d0)) + 3.350343815022304d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.8e+17) || !(z <= 18500.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y * (0.279195317918525 + ((z * (z * 0.0692910599291889)) + (z * 0.4917317610505968)))) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.8e+17) or not (z <= 18500.0):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + ((y * (0.279195317918525 + ((z * (z * 0.0692910599291889)) + (z * 0.4917317610505968)))) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.8e+17) || !(z <= 18500.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(0.279195317918525 + Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889)) + Float64(z * 0.4917317610505968)))) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.8e+17) || ~((z <= 18500.0)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + ((y * (0.279195317918525 + ((z * (z * 0.0692910599291889)) + (z * 0.4917317610505968)))) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.8e+17], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 18500.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(0.279195317918525 + N[(N[(z * N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.8e17 or 18500 < z

   1. Initial program 36.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 36.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 47.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

   if -5.8e17 < z < 18500

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)} \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot z + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot z\right)} + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot z + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot z\right)} + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+17} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 18500\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 + \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right) + z \cdot 0.4917317610505968\right)\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+17} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 18500\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.8e+17) (not (<= z 18500.0)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+
    (/
     (*
      y
      (+
       (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
       0.279195317918525))
     (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
    x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.8e+17) || !(z <= 18500.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.8d+17)) .or. (.not. (z <= 18500.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0)) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103d0)) + 3.350343815022304d0)) + x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.8e+17) || !(z <= 18500.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.8e+17) or not (z <= 18500.0):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.8e+17) || !(z <= 18500.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.8e+17) || ~((z <= 18500.0)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.8e+17], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 18500.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.8e17 or 18500 < z

   1. Initial program 36.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 36.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 47.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

   if -5.8e17 < z < 18500

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+17} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 18500\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 99.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + z \cdot -0.0005951669793454025\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -82000.0) (not (<= z 3.5)))
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (-
      0.0692910599291889
      (/ (+ (/ 0.4046220386999212 z) -0.07512208616047561) z))))
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (+
      0.08333333333333323
      (*
       z
       (-
        (* z (+ 0.0007936505811533442 (* z -0.0005951669793454025)))
        0.00277777777751721)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 3.5)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-82000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.5d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 - (((0.4046220386999212d0 / z) + (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442d0 + (z * (-0.0005951669793454025d0)))) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 3.5)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -82000.0) or not (z <= 3.5):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 3.5))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(0.0007936505811533442 + Float64(z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || ~((z <= 3.5)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -82000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.5]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 - N[(N[(N[(0.4046220386999212 / z), $MachinePrecision] + -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(0.0007936505811533442 + N[(z * -0.0005951669793454025), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -82000 or 3.5 < z

   1. Initial program 39.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 99.0%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + -1 \cdot \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

      3. sub-neg 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}}{z}\right) \]

      4. associate-*r/ 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot 1}{z}} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}{z}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212}}{z} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}{z}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -82000 < z < 3.5

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + -0.0005951669793454025 \cdot z\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + z \cdot -0.0005951669793454025\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{-2.181088706546648}{z}}{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\frac{y \cdot t\_0}{z} + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + z \cdot -0.0005951669793454025\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{t\_0}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          0.07512208616047561
          (/ (+ 0.4046220386999212 (/ -2.181088706546648 z)) z))))
   (if (<= z -82000.0)
     (+ x (+ (/ (* y t_0) z) (* y 0.0692910599291889)))
     (if (<= z 3.6)
       (+
        x
        (*
         y
         (+
          0.08333333333333323
          (*
           z
           (-
            (* z (+ 0.0007936505811533442 (* z -0.0005951669793454025)))
            0.00277777777751721)))))
       (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ t_0 z))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = 0.07512208616047561 - ((0.4046220386999212 + (-2.181088706546648 / z)) / z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -82000.0) {
		tmp = x + (((y * t_0) / z) + (y * 0.0692910599291889));
	} else if (z <= 3.6) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (t_0 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = 0.07512208616047561d0 - ((0.4046220386999212d0 + ((-2.181088706546648d0) / z)) / z)
    if (z <= (-82000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + (((y * t_0) / z) + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0))
    else if (z <= 3.6d0) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442d0 + (z * (-0.0005951669793454025d0)))) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (t_0 / z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = 0.07512208616047561 - ((0.4046220386999212 + (-2.181088706546648 / z)) / z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -82000.0) {
		tmp = x + (((y * t_0) / z) + (y * 0.0692910599291889));
	} else if (z <= 3.6) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (t_0 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = 0.07512208616047561 - ((0.4046220386999212 + (-2.181088706546648 / z)) / z)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -82000.0:
		tmp = x + (((y * t_0) / z) + (y * 0.0692910599291889))
	elif z <= 3.6:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (t_0 / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(0.07512208616047561 - Float64(Float64(0.4046220386999212 + Float64(-2.181088706546648 / z)) / z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -82000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y * t_0) / z) + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889)));
	elseif (z <= 3.6)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(0.0007936505811533442 + Float64(z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(t_0 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = 0.07512208616047561 - ((0.4046220386999212 + (-2.181088706546648 / z)) / z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -82000.0)
		tmp = x + (((y * t_0) / z) + (y * 0.0692910599291889));
	elseif (z <= 3.6)
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (t_0 / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(0.07512208616047561 - N[(N[(0.4046220386999212 + N[(-2.181088706546648 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -82000.0], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.6], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(0.0007936505811533442 + N[(z * -0.0005951669793454025), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(t$95$0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -82000

   1. Initial program 39.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 46.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 46.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 46.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 46.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 46.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{\left(-6.012459259764103 \cdot \frac{0.279195317918525 \cdot y - \left(-6.012459259764103 \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y\right) + 0.23214887407009785 \cdot y\right)}{z} + \left(0.279195317918525 \cdot y + 3.350343815022304 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)\right) - \left(-6.012459259764103 \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y\right) + 0.23214887407009785 \cdot y\right)}{z} + -0.4917317610505968 \cdot y\right) - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(0.07512208616047561 + -1 \cdot \frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(0.07512208616047561 + -1 \cdot \frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 + -1 \cdot \frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)}\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)}\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      5. associate--l+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212 + \left(0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)}}{z}\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      6. distribute-rgt-out-- 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{z} \cdot \left(0.2516848167393221 - 2.43277352328597\right)}}{z}\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      7. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{1}{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-2.181088706546648}}{z}\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

   8. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{1}{z} \cdot -2.181088706546648}{z}\right)\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{1}{z} \cdot -2.181088706546648}{z}\right)\right)\right)}{z}} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      2. associate-*l/ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot -2.181088706546648}{z}}}{z}\right)\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{\color{blue}{-2.181088706546648}}{z}}{z}\right)\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{-2.181088706546648}{z}}{z}\right)\right)\right)}{z}} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 99.6%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{-2.181088706546648}{z}}{z}\right)\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

       2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.6%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{-2.181088706546648}{z}}{z}\right)\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

       3. remove-double-neg 99.6%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{-2.181088706546648}{z}}{z}\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

   12. Simplified 99.6%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{-2.181088706546648}{z}}{z}\right)}{z}} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

   if -82000 < z < 3.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + -0.0005951669793454025 \cdot z\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.60000000000000009 < z

   1. Initial program 39.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 54.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 54.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 54.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 54.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 54.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 98.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{\left(-6.012459259764103 \cdot \frac{0.279195317918525 \cdot y - \left(-6.012459259764103 \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y\right) + 0.23214887407009785 \cdot y\right)}{z} + \left(0.279195317918525 \cdot y + 3.350343815022304 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)\right) - \left(-6.012459259764103 \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y\right) + 0.23214887407009785 \cdot y\right)}{z} + -0.4917317610505968 \cdot y\right) - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 98.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(0.07512208616047561 + -1 \cdot \frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(0.07512208616047561 + -1 \cdot \frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 + -1 \cdot \frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)}\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)}\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      5. associate--l+ 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212 + \left(0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)}}{z}\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      6. distribute-rgt-out-- 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{z} \cdot \left(0.2516848167393221 - 2.43277352328597\right)}}{z}\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      7. metadata-eval 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{1}{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-2.181088706546648}}{z}\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

   8. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{1}{z} \cdot -2.181088706546648}{z}\right)\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + -1 \cdot \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - \left(0.07512208616047561 + 2.181088706546648 \cdot \frac{1}{{z}^{2}}\right)}{z}\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 98.8%

       \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{-2.181088706546648}{z}}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\frac{y \cdot \left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{-2.181088706546648}{z}}{z}\right)}{z} + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + z \cdot -0.0005951669793454025\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{-2.181088706546648}{z}}{z}}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 99.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.5:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + z \cdot -0.0005951669793454025\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{-2.181088706546648}{z}}{z}}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -82000.0)
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (-
      0.0692910599291889
      (/ (+ (/ 0.4046220386999212 z) -0.07512208616047561) z))))
   (if (<= z 3.5)
     (+
      x
      (*
       y
       (+
        0.08333333333333323
        (*
         z
         (-
          (* z (+ 0.0007936505811533442 (* z -0.0005951669793454025)))
          0.00277777777751721)))))
     (+
      x
      (*
       y
       (+
        0.0692910599291889
        (/
         (-
          0.07512208616047561
          (/ (+ 0.4046220386999212 (/ -2.181088706546648 z)) z))
         z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -82000.0) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	} else if (z <= 3.5) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + ((0.07512208616047561 - ((0.4046220386999212 + (-2.181088706546648 / z)) / z)) / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-82000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 - (((0.4046220386999212d0 / z) + (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z)))
    else if (z <= 3.5d0) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442d0 + (z * (-0.0005951669793454025d0)))) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + ((0.07512208616047561d0 - ((0.4046220386999212d0 + ((-2.181088706546648d0) / z)) / z)) / z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -82000.0) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	} else if (z <= 3.5) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + ((0.07512208616047561 - ((0.4046220386999212 + (-2.181088706546648 / z)) / z)) / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -82000.0:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)))
	elif z <= 3.5:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + ((0.07512208616047561 - ((0.4046220386999212 + (-2.181088706546648 / z)) / z)) / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -82000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z))));
	elseif (z <= 3.5)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(0.0007936505811533442 + Float64(z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(Float64(0.07512208616047561 - Float64(Float64(0.4046220386999212 + Float64(-2.181088706546648 / z)) / z)) / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -82000.0)
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	elseif (z <= 3.5)
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + ((0.07512208616047561 - ((0.4046220386999212 + (-2.181088706546648 / z)) / z)) / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -82000.0], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 - N[(N[(N[(0.4046220386999212 / z), $MachinePrecision] + -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.5], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(0.0007936505811533442 + N[(z * -0.0005951669793454025), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(N[(0.07512208616047561 - N[(N[(0.4046220386999212 + N[(-2.181088706546648 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -82000

   1. Initial program 39.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 46.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 46.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 46.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 46.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 46.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + -1 \cdot \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

      3. sub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}}{z}\right) \]

      4. associate-*r/ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot 1}{z}} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}{z}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212}}{z} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}{z}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -82000 < z < 3.5

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + -0.0005951669793454025 \cdot z\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.5 < z

   1. Initial program 39.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 54.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 54.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 54.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 54.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 54.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 98.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{\left(-6.012459259764103 \cdot \frac{0.279195317918525 \cdot y - \left(-6.012459259764103 \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y\right) + 0.23214887407009785 \cdot y\right)}{z} + \left(0.279195317918525 \cdot y + 3.350343815022304 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)\right) - \left(-6.012459259764103 \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y\right) + 0.23214887407009785 \cdot y\right)}{z} + -0.4917317610505968 \cdot y\right) - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 98.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(0.07512208616047561 + -1 \cdot \frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(0.07512208616047561 + -1 \cdot \frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 + -1 \cdot \frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)}\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{\left(0.4046220386999212 + 0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{z}\right)}\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      5. associate--l+ 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212 + \left(0.2516848167393221 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 2.43277352328597 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)}}{z}\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      6. distribute-rgt-out-- 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{z} \cdot \left(0.2516848167393221 - 2.43277352328597\right)}}{z}\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

      7. metadata-eval 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{1}{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-2.181088706546648}}{z}\right)\right)}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

   8. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{1}{z} \cdot -2.181088706546648}{z}\right)\right)}}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + -1 \cdot \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - \left(0.07512208616047561 + 2.181088706546648 \cdot \frac{1}{{z}^{2}}\right)}{z}\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 98.8%

       \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{-2.181088706546648}{z}}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.5:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + z \cdot -0.0005951669793454025\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 + \frac{-2.181088706546648}{z}}{z}}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 99.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.8\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -82000.0) (not (<= z 4.8)))
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (-
      0.0692910599291889
      (/ (+ (/ 0.4046220386999212 z) -0.07512208616047561) z))))
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (+
      0.08333333333333323
      (* z (- (* z 0.0007936505811533442) 0.00277777777751721)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 4.8)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-82000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.8d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 - (((0.4046220386999212d0 / z) + (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442d0) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 4.8)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -82000.0) or not (z <= 4.8):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 4.8))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || ~((z <= 4.8)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -82000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.8]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 - N[(N[(N[(0.4046220386999212 / z), $MachinePrecision] + -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0007936505811533442), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -82000 or 4.79999999999999982 < z

   1. Initial program 39.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 99.0%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + -1 \cdot \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

      3. sub-neg 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}}{z}\right) \]

      4. associate-*r/ 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot 1}{z}} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}{z}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212}}{z} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}{z}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -82000 < z < 4.79999999999999982

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.8\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 99.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -82000.0) (not (<= z 4.2)))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z))))
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (+
      0.08333333333333323
      (* z (- (* z 0.0007936505811533442) 0.00277777777751721)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 4.2)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-82000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.2d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442d0) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 4.2)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -82000.0) or not (z <= 4.2):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 4.2))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || ~((z <= 4.2)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -82000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.2]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0007936505811533442), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -82000 or 4.20000000000000018 < z

   1. Initial program 39.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -82000 < z < 4.20000000000000018

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 99.2% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -82000.0) (not (<= z 5.0)))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z))))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.08333333333333323 (* z -0.00277777777751721))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 5.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-82000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * (-0.00277777777751721d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 5.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -82000.0) or not (z <= 5.0):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 5.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * -0.00277777777751721))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || ~((z <= 5.0)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -82000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * -0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -82000 or 5 < z

   1. Initial program 39.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -82000 < z < 5

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.0%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + -0.00277777777751721 \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + \color{blue}{z \cdot -0.00277777777751721}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 98.9% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -82000.0) (not (<= z 5.2)))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z))))
   (+ x (* y 0.08333333333333323))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 5.2)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-82000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.2d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 5.2)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -82000.0) or not (z <= 5.2):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 5.2))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || ~((z <= 5.2)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -82000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.2]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -82000 or 5.20000000000000018 < z

   1. Initial program 39.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      2. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -82000 < z < 5.20000000000000018

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} + x \]

   7. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323 + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 98.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.8\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -82000.0) (not (<= z 5.8)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (* y 0.08333333333333323))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 5.8)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-82000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.8d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 5.8)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -82000.0) or not (z <= 5.8):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || !(z <= 5.8))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -82000.0) || ~((z <= 5.8)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -82000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.8]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -82000 or 5.79999999999999982 < z

   1. Initial program 39.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 39.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 50.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 50.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 50.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 50.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

   if -82000 < z < 5.79999999999999982

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} + x \]

   7. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323 + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.8\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 79.5% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 70.4%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. associate-/l* 75.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

   3. fma-define 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   5. fma-define 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   6. fma-define 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   8. fma-define 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 75.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

7. Simplified 79.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

8. Final simplification 79.3%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 51.2% accurate, 21.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 70.4%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. associate-/l* 75.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

   3. fma-define 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   5. fma-define 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   6. fma-define 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   8. fma-define 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 75.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 49.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -8120153.652456675:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 6.576118972787377 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y)
          (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))
   (if (< z -8120153.652456675)
     t_0
     (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20)
       (+
        x
        (*
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
           0.279195317918525))
         (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561d0 / z) + 0.0692910599291889d0) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125d0 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
    if (z < (-8120153.652456675d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z < 6.576118972787377d+20) then
        tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) * (1.0d0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -8120153.652456675:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z < 6.576118972787377e+20:
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.40462203869992125 * y) / Float64(z * z)) - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(0.40462203869992125 * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -8120153.652456675], t$95$0, If[Less[z, 6.576118972787377e+20], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024172 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -324806146098267/40000000) (- (* (+ (/ 7512208616047561/100000000000000000 z) 692910599291889/10000000000000000) y) (- (/ (* 323697630959937/800000000000000 y) (* z z)) x)) (if (< z 657611897278737700000) (+ x (* (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (/ 1 (+ (* (+ z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000)))) (- (* (+ (/ 7512208616047561/100000000000000000 z) 692910599291889/10000000000000000) y) (- (/ (* 323697630959937/800000000000000 y) (* z z)) x)))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))