Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.3s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) - z \cdot \left(x + y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ x y) (* z (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) - (z * (x + y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) - (z * (x + y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) - (z * (x + y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) - (z * (x + y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) - Float64(z * Float64(x + y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) - (z * (x + y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

   2. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) - z \cdot \left(x + y\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 75.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;1 - z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+236}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;1 - z \leq -50 \lor \neg \left(1 - z \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (- 1.0 z) -1e+236)
   (* y (- z))
   (if (or (<= (- 1.0 z) -50.0) (not (<= (- 1.0 z) 2.0)))
     (* x (- z))
     (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((1.0 - z) <= -1e+236) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else if (((1.0 - z) <= -50.0) || !((1.0 - z) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = x * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((1.0d0 - z) <= (-1d+236)) then
        tmp = y * -z
    else if (((1.0d0 - z) <= (-50.0d0)) .or. (.not. ((1.0d0 - z) <= 2.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * -z
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((1.0 - z) <= -1e+236) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else if (((1.0 - z) <= -50.0) || !((1.0 - z) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = x * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (1.0 - z) <= -1e+236:
		tmp = y * -z
	elif ((1.0 - z) <= -50.0) or not ((1.0 - z) <= 2.0):
		tmp = x * -z
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(1.0 - z) <= -1e+236)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	elseif ((Float64(1.0 - z) <= -50.0) || !(Float64(1.0 - z) <= 2.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((1.0 - z) <= -1e+236)
		tmp = y * -z;
	elseif (((1.0 - z) <= -50.0) || ~(((1.0 - z) <= 2.0)))
		tmp = x * -z;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision], -1e+236], N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision], -50.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision], 2.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * (-z)), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) z) < -1.00000000000000005e236

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 43.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 43.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 43.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   8. Simplified 43.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -1.00000000000000005e236 < (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) z) < -50 or 2 < (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) z)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 50.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 49.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 49.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot x \]

   if -50 < (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) z) < 2

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;1 - z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+236}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;1 - z \leq -50 \lor \neg \left(1 - z \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 62.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.7 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 4.7e-122)
   (* x (- 1.0 z))
   (if (<= y 6.8e-33) (+ x y) (* y (- 1.0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4.7e-122) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else if (y <= 6.8e-33) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 4.7d-122) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else if (y <= 6.8d-33) then
        tmp = x + y
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4.7e-122) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else if (y <= 6.8e-33) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 4.7e-122:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	elif y <= 6.8e-33:
		tmp = x + y
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 4.7e-122)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	elseif (y <= 6.8e-33)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 4.7e-122)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	elseif (y <= 6.8e-33)
		tmp = x + y;
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 4.7e-122], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 6.8e-33], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 4.6999999999999999e-122

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 57.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 57.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 57.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if 4.6999999999999999e-122 < y < 6.8000000000000001e-33

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   if 6.8000000000000001e-33 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.7 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -55000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -55000000000.0) (not (<= z 1.0))) (* y (- z)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -55000000000.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-55000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * -z
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -55000000000.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -55000000000.0) or not (z <= 1.0):
		tmp = y * -z
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -55000000000.0) || !(z <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -55000000000.0) || ~((z <= 1.0)))
		tmp = y * -z;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -55000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.5e10 or 1 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 50.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 50.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   8. Simplified 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -5.5e10 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -55000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 50.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-249}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ x y) -5e-249) (- x (* x z)) (- y (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -5e-249) {
		tmp = x - (x * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x + y) <= (-5d-249)) then
        tmp = x - (x * z)
    else
        tmp = y - (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -5e-249) {
		tmp = x - (x * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x + y) <= -5e-249:
		tmp = x - (x * z)
	else:
		tmp = y - (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= -5e-249)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(x * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y - Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + y) <= -5e-249)
		tmp = x - (x * z);
	else
		tmp = y - (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], -5e-249], N[(x - N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < -4.9999999999999999e-249

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 49.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 49.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 49.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - x \cdot z} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 49.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - x \cdot z} \]

   if -4.9999999999999999e-249 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 53.1%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   7. Simplified 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-neg-out 53.1%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 53.1%

         \[\leadsto y + \left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y - z \cdot y} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y - z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 51.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-249}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 z) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (1.0d0 - z) * (x + y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * Float64(x + y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 32.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{-22}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -1.65e-22) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.65e-22) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.65d-22)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.65e-22) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.65e-22:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.65e-22)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.65e-22)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.65e-22], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.65e-22

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 49.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 49.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 49.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 36.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.65e-22 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 55.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 55.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 55.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 35.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 51.3% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 53.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

5. Simplified 53.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

6. Final simplification 53.5%

   \[\leadsto x + y \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 27.0% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 53.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

5. Simplified 53.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 25.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024172 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H"
  :precision binary64
  (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))