Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 5.3s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma z 5.0 (* x (+ z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(z, 5.0, (x * (z + y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(z, 5.0, Float64(x * Float64(z + y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * 5.0 + N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 60.3% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-105}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-75}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+97} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+168}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -3.3e+74)
   (* z x)
   (if (<= x -1.02e-105)
     (* x y)
     (if (<= x 1.4e-75)
       (* z 5.0)
       (if (or (<= x 3.5e+97) (not (<= x 4e+168))) (* x y) (* z x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.3e+74) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if (x <= -1.02e-105) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 1.4e-75) {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	} else if ((x <= 3.5e+97) || !(x <= 4e+168)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-3.3d+74)) then
        tmp = z * x
    else if (x <= (-1.02d-105)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= 1.4d-75) then
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    else if ((x <= 3.5d+97) .or. (.not. (x <= 4d+168))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.3e+74) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if (x <= -1.02e-105) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 1.4e-75) {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	} else if ((x <= 3.5e+97) || !(x <= 4e+168)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -3.3e+74:
		tmp = z * x
	elif x <= -1.02e-105:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= 1.4e-75:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	elif (x <= 3.5e+97) or not (x <= 4e+168):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -3.3e+74)
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	elseif (x <= -1.02e-105)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= 1.4e-75)
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	elseif ((x <= 3.5e+97) || !(x <= 4e+168))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -3.3e+74)
		tmp = z * x;
	elseif (x <= -1.02e-105)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= 1.4e-75)
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	elseif ((x <= 3.5e+97) || ~((x <= 4e+168)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -3.3e+74], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -1.02e-105], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.4e-75], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[x, 3.5e+97], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4e+168]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -3.3000000000000002e74 or 3.5000000000000001e97 < x < 3.9999999999999997e168

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]

   if -3.3000000000000002e74 < x < -1.0200000000000001e-105 or 1.39999999999999999e-75 < x < 3.5000000000000001e97 or 3.9999999999999997e168 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.0200000000000001e-105 < x < 1.39999999999999999e-75

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 77.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 77.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]

   7. Simplified 77.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-105}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-75}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+97} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+168}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+25} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-15}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5 + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.55e+25) (not (<= x 7e-15)))
   (* x (+ z y))
   (+ (* z 5.0) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.55e+25) || !(x <= 7e-15)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.55d+25)) .or. (.not. (x <= 7d-15))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = (z * 5.0d0) + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.55e+25) || !(x <= 7e-15)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.55e+25) or not (x <= 7e-15):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.55e+25) || !(x <= 7e-15))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * 5.0) + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.55e+25) || ~((x <= 7e-15)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.55e+25], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 7e-15]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.5499999999999999e25 or 7.0000000000000001e-15 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   if -1.5499999999999999e25 < x < 7.0000000000000001e-15

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \cdot 5 \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+25} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-15}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5 + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 83.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-105} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-76}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.05e-105) (not (<= x 3e-76))) (* x (+ z y)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.05e-105) || !(x <= 3e-76)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.05d-105)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3d-76))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.05e-105) || !(x <= 3e-76)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.05e-105) or not (x <= 3e-76):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.05e-105) || !(x <= 3e-76))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.05e-105) || ~((x <= 3e-76)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.05e-105], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3e-76]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.05e-105 or 3.00000000000000024e-76 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   if -1.05e-105 < x < 3.00000000000000024e-76

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 77.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 77.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]

   7. Simplified 77.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-105} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-76}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 52.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-94} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.42 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -7e-94) (not (<= y 1.42e-12))) (* x y) (* z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -7e-94) || !(y <= 1.42e-12)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-7d-94)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.42d-12))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -7e-94) || !(y <= 1.42e-12)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -7e-94) or not (y <= 1.42e-12):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -7e-94) || !(y <= 1.42e-12))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -7e-94) || ~((y <= 1.42e-12)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -7e-94], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.42e-12]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -6.99999999999999996e-94 or 1.42e-12 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 69.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -6.99999999999999996e-94 < y < 1.42e-12

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 51.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-94} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.42 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(z + y\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ z y)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(z + y)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(z + y\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 41.5% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 46.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + 5\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ x 5.0) z) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x + 5.0d0) * z) + (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + 5.0) * z) + Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024172 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ (* (+ x 5) z) (* x y)))

  (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))