Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 96.0% → 98.6%

Time: 14.9s

Alternatives: 18

Speedup: 0.4×

• 42.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 96.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.6% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{b} + \left(t \cdot \frac{z}{b} + x \cdot \frac{y}{b}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY)
     t_1
     (* b (+ a (+ (* c (/ i b)) (+ (* t (/ z b)) (* x (/ y b)))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = b * (a + ((c * (i / b)) + ((t * (z / b)) + (x * (y / b)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = b * (a + ((c * (i / b)) + ((t * (z / b)) + (x * (y / b)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = b * (a + ((c * (i / b)) + ((t * (z / b)) + (x * (y / b)))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(a + Float64(Float64(c * Float64(i / b)) + Float64(Float64(t * Float64(z / b)) + Float64(x * Float64(y / b))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = b * (a + ((c * (i / b)) + ((t * (z / b)) + (x * (y / b)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(b * N[(a + N[(N[(c * N[(i / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t * N[(z / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(y / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 18.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 18.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 56.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 62.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around inf 43.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(a + \left(\frac{c \cdot i}{b} + \left(\frac{t \cdot z}{b} + \frac{x \cdot y}{b}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 56.3%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(a + \left(\color{blue}{c \cdot \frac{i}{b}} + \left(\frac{t \cdot z}{b} + \frac{x \cdot y}{b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 75.0%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(a + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{b} + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot \frac{z}{b}} + \frac{x \cdot y}{b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 75.0%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(a + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{b} + \left(t \cdot \frac{z}{b} + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{b}}\right)\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(a + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{b} + \left(t \cdot \frac{z}{b} + x \cdot \frac{y}{b}\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{b} + \left(t \cdot \frac{z}{b} + x \cdot \frac{y}{b}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.1% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma a b (fma x y (* z t)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, (z * t))));
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, Float64(z * t))))
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(a * b + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 66.3% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-169}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+80}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* a b) (* c i))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* a b))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -1e+40)
     t_2
     (if (<= (* x y) -4.8e-16)
       t_1
       (if (<= (* x y) 2.5e-169)
         (+ (* a b) (* z t))
         (if (<= (* x y) 6.5e+80) t_1 t_2))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+40) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -4.8e-16) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.5e-169) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 6.5e+80) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i)
    t_2 = (x * y) + (a * b)
    if ((x * y) <= (-1d+40)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if ((x * y) <= (-4.8d-16)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= 2.5d-169) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 6.5d+80) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+40) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -4.8e-16) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.5e-169) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 6.5e+80) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i)
	t_2 = (x * y) + (a * b)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1e+40:
		tmp = t_2
	elif (x * y) <= -4.8e-16:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= 2.5e-169:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 6.5e+80:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+40)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -4.8e-16)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2.5e-169)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 6.5e+80)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i);
	t_2 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+40)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -4.8e-16)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 2.5e-169)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 6.5e+80)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+40], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4.8e-16], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2.5e-169], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 6.5e+80], t$95$1, t$95$2]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.00000000000000003e40 or 6.4999999999999998e80 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 90.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 78.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.00000000000000003e40 < (*.f64 x y) < -4.8000000000000001e-16 or 2.5000000000000001e-169 < (*.f64 x y) < 6.4999999999999998e80

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 70.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -4.8000000000000001e-16 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.5000000000000001e-169

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 77.8%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-169}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+80}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 63.4% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-167}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+151}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* a b) (* c i))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -1.2e+181)
     (* x y)
     (if (<= (* x y) -3.5e-16)
       t_1
       (if (<= (* x y) 2.5e-167)
         (+ (* a b) (* z t))
         (if (<= (* x y) 9.6e+151) t_1 (* x y)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.2e+181) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -3.5e-16) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.5e-167) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 9.6e+151) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i)
    if ((x * y) <= (-1.2d+181)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= (-3.5d-16)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= 2.5d-167) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 9.6d+151) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.2e+181) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -3.5e-16) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.5e-167) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 9.6e+151) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1.2e+181:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= -3.5e-16:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= 2.5e-167:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 9.6e+151:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1.2e+181)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -3.5e-16)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2.5e-167)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 9.6e+151)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (a * b) + (c * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.2e+181)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -3.5e-16)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 2.5e-167)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 9.6e+151)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.2e+181], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -3.5e-16], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2.5e-167], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 9.6e+151], t$95$1, N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.20000000000000001e181 or 9.6000000000000004e151 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 87.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 83.2%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in c around 0 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.20000000000000001e181 < (*.f64 x y) < -3.50000000000000017e-16 or 2.5000000000000001e-167 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.6000000000000004e151

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 63.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -3.50000000000000017e-16 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.5000000000000001e-167

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 77.8%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-167}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+151}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 97.3% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ t_2 := c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + t\_1\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))) (t_2 (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) t_1))))
   (if (<= t_2 INFINITY) t_2 t_1)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double t_2 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + t_1);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double t_2 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + t_1);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	t_2 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + t_1)
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_2
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_2;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	t_2 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + t_1);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_2;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, Infinity], t$95$2, t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 18.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 18.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 56.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 62.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 43.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 50.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 66.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+142}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot \left(i + \frac{z \cdot t}{c}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-293}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+56}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -5e+142)
   (* c (+ i (/ (* z t) c)))
   (if (<= (* c i) -2e-293)
     (+ (* x y) (* a b))
     (if (<= (* c i) 5e+56) (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (+ (* x y) (* c i))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -5e+142) {
		tmp = c * (i + ((z * t) / c));
	} else if ((c * i) <= -2e-293) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 5e+56) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-5d+142)) then
        tmp = c * (i + ((z * t) / c))
    else if ((c * i) <= (-2d-293)) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
    else if ((c * i) <= 5d+56) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -5e+142) {
		tmp = c * (i + ((z * t) / c));
	} else if ((c * i) <= -2e-293) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 5e+56) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -5e+142:
		tmp = c * (i + ((z * t) / c))
	elif (c * i) <= -2e-293:
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
	elif (c * i) <= 5e+56:
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -5e+142)
		tmp = Float64(c * Float64(i + Float64(Float64(z * t) / c)));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= -2e-293)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 5e+56)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -5e+142)
		tmp = c * (i + ((z * t) / c));
	elseif ((c * i) <= -2e-293)
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	elseif ((c * i) <= 5e+56)
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -5e+142], N[(c * N[(i + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -2e-293], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 5e+56], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -5.0000000000000001e142

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in c around inf 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(i + \frac{t \cdot z}{c}\right)} \]

   if -5.0000000000000001e142 < (*.f64 c i) < -2.0000000000000001e-293

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -2.0000000000000001e-293 < (*.f64 c i) < 5.00000000000000024e56

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]

   if 5.00000000000000024e56 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 90.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+142}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot \left(i + \frac{z \cdot t}{c}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-293}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+56}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 66.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-304}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -4.5e+139)
   (+ (* c i) (* z t))
   (if (<= (* c i) -2.6e-304)
     (+ (* x y) (* a b))
     (if (<= (* c i) 6.5e+57) (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (+ (* x y) (* c i))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -4.5e+139) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((c * i) <= -2.6e-304) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 6.5e+57) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-4.5d+139)) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else if ((c * i) <= (-2.6d-304)) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
    else if ((c * i) <= 6.5d+57) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -4.5e+139) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((c * i) <= -2.6e-304) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 6.5e+57) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -4.5e+139:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	elif (c * i) <= -2.6e-304:
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
	elif (c * i) <= 6.5e+57:
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -4.5e+139)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= -2.6e-304)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 6.5e+57)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -4.5e+139)
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	elseif ((c * i) <= -2.6e-304)
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	elseif ((c * i) <= 6.5e+57)
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -4.5e+139], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -2.6e-304], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 6.5e+57], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -4.4999999999999999e139

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if -4.4999999999999999e139 < (*.f64 c i) < -2.59999999999999997e-304

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -2.59999999999999997e-304 < (*.f64 c i) < 6.4999999999999997e57

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]

   if 6.4999999999999997e57 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 90.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-304}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 87.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(c + \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{i} + \frac{z \cdot t}{i}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (* c i) -1e+144)
     (* i (+ c (+ (/ (* a b) i) (/ (* z t) i))))
     (if (<= (* c i) 2e+22) (+ (* a b) t_1) (+ (* c i) t_1)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+144) {
		tmp = i * (c + (((a * b) / i) + ((z * t) / i)));
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2e+22) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
    if ((c * i) <= (-1d+144)) then
        tmp = i * (c + (((a * b) / i) + ((z * t) / i)))
    else if ((c * i) <= 2d+22) then
        tmp = (a * b) + t_1
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+144) {
		tmp = i * (c + (((a * b) / i) + ((z * t) / i)));
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2e+22) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -1e+144:
		tmp = i * (c + (((a * b) / i) + ((z * t) / i)))
	elif (c * i) <= 2e+22:
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -1e+144)
		tmp = Float64(i * Float64(c + Float64(Float64(Float64(a * b) / i) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / i))));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 2e+22)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+144)
		tmp = i * (c + (((a * b) / i) + ((z * t) / i)));
	elseif ((c * i) <= 2e+22)
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -1e+144], N[(i * N[(c + N[(N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 2e+22], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -1.00000000000000002e144

   1. Initial program 87.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around inf 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(c + \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{i} + \frac{t \cdot z}{i}\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.00000000000000002e144 < (*.f64 c i) < 2e22

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 2e22 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(c + \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{i} + \frac{z \cdot t}{i}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 87.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + i \cdot \left(c + \frac{a \cdot b}{i}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (* c i) -5e+38)
     (+ (* x y) (* i (+ c (/ (* a b) i))))
     (if (<= (* c i) 2e+22) (+ (* a b) t_1) (+ (* c i) t_1)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -5e+38) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (i * (c + ((a * b) / i)));
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2e+22) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
    if ((c * i) <= (-5d+38)) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (i * (c + ((a * b) / i)))
    else if ((c * i) <= 2d+22) then
        tmp = (a * b) + t_1
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -5e+38) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (i * (c + ((a * b) / i)));
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2e+22) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -5e+38:
		tmp = (x * y) + (i * (c + ((a * b) / i)))
	elif (c * i) <= 2e+22:
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -5e+38)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(i * Float64(c + Float64(Float64(a * b) / i))));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 2e+22)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -5e+38)
		tmp = (x * y) + (i * (c + ((a * b) / i)));
	elseif ((c * i) <= 2e+22)
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -5e+38], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(i * N[(c + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 2e+22], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -4.9999999999999997e38

   1. Initial program 89.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 89.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 89.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around inf 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(c + \frac{a \cdot b}{i}\right)} \]

   if -4.9999999999999997e38 < (*.f64 c i) < 2e22

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 2e22 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + i \cdot \left(c + \frac{a \cdot b}{i}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 87.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (* c i) -1e+144)
     (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
     (if (<= (* c i) 2e+22) (+ (* a b) t_1) (+ (* c i) t_1)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+144) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2e+22) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
    if ((c * i) <= (-1d+144)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else if ((c * i) <= 2d+22) then
        tmp = (a * b) + t_1
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+144) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2e+22) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -1e+144:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	elif (c * i) <= 2e+22:
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -1e+144)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 2e+22)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+144)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	elseif ((c * i) <= 2e+22)
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -1e+144], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 2e+22], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -1.00000000000000002e144

   1. Initial program 87.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -1.00000000000000002e144 < (*.f64 c i) < 2e22

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 2e22 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 86.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -1e+144)
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
   (if (<= (* c i) 8e+77)
     (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))
     (+ (* x y) (* c i)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+144) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else if ((c * i) <= 8e+77) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-1d+144)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else if ((c * i) <= 8d+77) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+144) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else if ((c * i) <= 8e+77) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -1e+144:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	elif (c * i) <= 8e+77:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -1e+144)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 8e+77)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+144)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	elseif ((c * i) <= 8e+77)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -1e+144], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 8e+77], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -1.00000000000000002e144

   1. Initial program 87.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -1.00000000000000002e144 < (*.f64 c i) < 7.99999999999999986e77

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 7.99999999999999986e77 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 89.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 89.2%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 84.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+137}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -9.5e+180)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) 7.2e+137)
     (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
     (+ (* x y) (* a b)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -9.5e+180) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 7.2e+137) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-9.5d+180)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= 7.2d+137) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -9.5e+180) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 7.2e+137) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -9.5e+180:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= 7.2e+137:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -9.5e+180)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 7.2e+137)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -9.5e+180)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 7.2e+137)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -9.5e+180], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 7.2e+137], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -9.5000000000000003e180

   1. Initial program 86.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 90.5%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in c around 0 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -9.5000000000000003e180 < (*.f64 x y) < 7.1999999999999999e137

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 7.1999999999999999e137 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 87.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 87.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 87.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 87.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+137}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 43.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 650:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+151}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -3.3e+66)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) 650.0) (* a b) (if (<= (* x y) 1e+151) (* c i) (* x y)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -3.3e+66) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 650.0) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+151) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-3.3d+66)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= 650.0d0) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((x * y) <= 1d+151) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -3.3e+66) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 650.0) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+151) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -3.3e+66:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= 650.0:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (x * y) <= 1e+151:
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -3.3e+66)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 650.0)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e+151)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -3.3e+66)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 650.0)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1e+151)
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -3.3e+66], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 650.0], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+151], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -3.3000000000000001e66 or 1.00000000000000002e151 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 90.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 85.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 77.0%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in c around 0 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -3.3000000000000001e66 < (*.f64 x y) < 650

   1. Initial program 95.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 40.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if 650 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.00000000000000002e151

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 44.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 43.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-304}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -1.75e+93)
   (* c i)
   (if (<= (* c i) -6.8e-304)
     (* a b)
     (if (<= (* c i) 1.4e+58) (* z t) (* c i)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1.75e+93) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -6.8e-304) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1.4e+58) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-1.75d+93)) then
        tmp = c * i
    else if ((c * i) <= (-6.8d-304)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((c * i) <= 1.4d+58) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = c * i
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1.75e+93) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -6.8e-304) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1.4e+58) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -1.75e+93:
		tmp = c * i
	elif (c * i) <= -6.8e-304:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (c * i) <= 1.4e+58:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = c * i
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -1.75e+93)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= -6.8e-304)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 1.4e+58)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -1.75e+93)
		tmp = c * i;
	elseif ((c * i) <= -6.8e-304)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 1.4e+58)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = c * i;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -1.75e+93], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -6.8e-304], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 1.4e+58], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -1.74999999999999999e93 or 1.3999999999999999e58 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 90.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 59.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -1.74999999999999999e93 < (*.f64 c i) < -6.7999999999999997e-304

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 46.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -6.7999999999999997e-304 < (*.f64 c i) < 1.3999999999999999e58

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 59.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 56.8%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 34.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-304}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 63.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+180} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+152}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1.65e+180) (not (<= (* x y) 3.3e+152)))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.65e+180) || !((x * y) <= 3.3e+152)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1.65d+180)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 3.3d+152))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.65e+180) || !((x * y) <= 3.3e+152)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1.65e+180) or not ((x * y) <= 3.3e+152):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1.65e+180) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 3.3e+152))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.65e+180) || ~(((x * y) <= 3.3e+152)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.65e+180], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 3.3e+152]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.64999999999999995e180 or 3.3000000000000001e152 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 87.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 83.2%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in c around 0 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.64999999999999995e180 < (*.f64 x y) < 3.3000000000000001e152

   1. Initial program 96.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 61.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+180} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+152}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 65.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+134}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -2.4e+134)
   (+ (* c i) (* z t))
   (if (<= (* c i) 3.1e+37) (+ (* x y) (* a b)) (+ (* x y) (* c i)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -2.4e+134) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 3.1e+37) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-2.4d+134)) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else if ((c * i) <= 3.1d+37) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -2.4e+134) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 3.1e+37) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -2.4e+134:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	elif (c * i) <= 3.1e+37:
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -2.4e+134)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 3.1e+37)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -2.4e+134)
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	elseif ((c * i) <= 3.1e+37)
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -2.4e+134], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 3.1e+37], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -2.40000000000000005e134

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if -2.40000000000000005e134 < (*.f64 c i) < 3.1000000000000002e37

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 71.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if 3.1000000000000002e37 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 81.2%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+134}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 17: 42.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+102} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+40}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -3.5e+102) (not (<= (* c i) 1.7e+40))) (* c i) (* a b)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.5e+102) || !((c * i) <= 1.7e+40)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-3.5d+102)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 1.7d+40))) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.5e+102) || !((c * i) <= 1.7e+40)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -3.5e+102) or not ((c * i) <= 1.7e+40):
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -3.5e+102) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 1.7e+40))
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.5e+102) || ~(((c * i) <= 1.7e+40)))
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -3.5e+102], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 1.7e+40]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -3.50000000000000011e102 or 1.69999999999999994e40 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 90.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -3.50000000000000011e102 < (*.f64 c i) < 1.69999999999999994e40

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 36.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+102} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+40}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 18: 27.3% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a * b
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a * b

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 28.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024170 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))