Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, D

Percentage Accurate: 92.9% → 97.9%

Time: 10.0s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

• 25.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (* y (- z x)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * (z - x)) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z - x)) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (* y (- z x)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * (z - x)) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z - x)) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{z - x}{\frac{t}{y}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (- z x) (/ t y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((z - x) / (t / y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((z - x) / (t / y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((z - x) / (t / y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((z - x) / (t / y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z - x) / Float64(t / y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((z - x) / (t / y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 91.5%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 87.5%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t} + \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 87.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot z}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 87.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

   3. associate-*r/ 88.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

   4. mul-1-neg 88.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

   5. associate-/l* 91.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right)\right) \]

   6. distribute-lft-neg-in 91.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right) \]

   7. distribute-rgt-in 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   8. sub-neg 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \]

5. Simplified 97.3%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]

   2. clear-num 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(z - x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

   3. un-div-inv 97.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{z - x}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 97.5%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{z - x}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 84.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+88} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{z - x}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{z \cdot y}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -5.5e+88) (not (<= y 7.8e-14)))
   (* y (/ (- z x) t))
   (+ x (/ (* z y) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5.5e+88) || !(y <= 7.8e-14)) {
		tmp = y * ((z - x) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * y) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-5.5d+88)) .or. (.not. (y <= 7.8d-14))) then
        tmp = y * ((z - x) / t)
    else
        tmp = x + ((z * y) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5.5e+88) || !(y <= 7.8e-14)) {
		tmp = y * ((z - x) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * y) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -5.5e+88) or not (y <= 7.8e-14):
		tmp = y * ((z - x) / t)
	else:
		tmp = x + ((z * y) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -5.5e+88) || !(y <= 7.8e-14))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z - x) / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * y) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -5.5e+88) || ~((y <= 7.8e-14)))
		tmp = y * ((z - x) / t);
	else
		tmp = x + ((z * y) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -5.5e+88], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 7.8e-14]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.5e88 or 7.7999999999999996e-14 < y

   1. Initial program 81.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 76.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z - x}{t}} \]

      2. *-commutative 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z - x}{t} \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z - x}{t} \cdot y} \]

   if -5.5e88 < y < 7.7999999999999996e-14

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 87.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+88} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{z - x}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{z \cdot y}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 87.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+63} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8200000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -8.5e+63) (not (<= x 8200000000000.0)))
   (* x (- 1.0 (/ y t)))
   (+ x (* z (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -8.5e+63) || !(x <= 8200000000000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-8.5d+63)) .or. (.not. (x <= 8200000000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (y / t))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (y / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -8.5e+63) || !(x <= 8200000000000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -8.5e+63) or not (x <= 8200000000000.0):
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (y / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -8.5e+63) || !(x <= 8200000000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(y / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -8.5e+63) || ~((x <= 8200000000000.0)))
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (y / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -8.5e+63], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 8200000000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -8.5000000000000004e63 or 8.2e12 < x

   1. Initial program 91.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 94.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 94.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   if -8.5000000000000004e63 < x < 8.2e12

   1. Initial program 91.4%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t} + \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot z}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 90.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

      3. associate-*r/ 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

      4. mul-1-neg 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-/l* 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right)\right) \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-in 95.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      8. sub-neg 95.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 95.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 86.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+63} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8200000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.55 \cdot 10^{-34} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 21500000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.55e-34) (not (<= x 21500000000.0)))
   (* x (- 1.0 (/ y t)))
   (+ x (* y (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.55e-34) || !(x <= 21500000000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.55d-34)) .or. (.not. (x <= 21500000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (y / t))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.55e-34) || !(x <= 21500000000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.55e-34) or not (x <= 21500000000.0):
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.55e-34) || !(x <= 21500000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.55e-34) || ~((x <= 21500000000.0)))
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.55e-34], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 21500000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.55e-34 or 2.15e10 < x

   1. Initial program 91.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 89.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 89.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 89.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 89.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   if -2.55e-34 < x < 2.15e10

   1. Initial program 91.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 82.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 85.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   5. Simplified 85.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.55 \cdot 10^{-34} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 21500000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 76.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+52} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{z - x}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.05e+52) (not (<= y 3e-17)))
   (* y (/ (- z x) t))
   (* x (- 1.0 (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.05e+52) || !(y <= 3e-17)) {
		tmp = y * ((z - x) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.05d+52)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3d-17))) then
        tmp = y * ((z - x) / t)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (y / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.05e+52) || !(y <= 3e-17)) {
		tmp = y * ((z - x) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.05e+52) or not (y <= 3e-17):
		tmp = y * ((z - x) / t)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.05e+52) || !(y <= 3e-17))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z - x) / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.05e+52) || ~((y <= 3e-17)))
		tmp = y * ((z - x) / t);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.05e+52], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3e-17]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.05e52 or 3.00000000000000006e-17 < y

   1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 90.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z - x}{t}} \]

      2. *-commutative 90.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z - x}{t} \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z - x}{t} \cdot y} \]

   if -1.05e52 < y < 3.00000000000000006e-17

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 77.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 77.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+52} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{z - x}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 73.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+179}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.32 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -4e+179)
   (/ y (/ t z))
   (if (<= z 1.32e+70) (* x (- 1.0 (/ y t))) (* z (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4e+179) {
		tmp = y / (t / z);
	} else if (z <= 1.32e+70) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	} else {
		tmp = z * (y / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-4d+179)) then
        tmp = y / (t / z)
    else if (z <= 1.32d+70) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (y / t))
    else
        tmp = z * (y / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4e+179) {
		tmp = y / (t / z);
	} else if (z <= 1.32e+70) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	} else {
		tmp = z * (y / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -4e+179:
		tmp = y / (t / z)
	elif z <= 1.32e+70:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t))
	else:
		tmp = z * (y / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -4e+179)
		tmp = Float64(y / Float64(t / z));
	elseif (z <= 1.32e+70)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -4e+179)
		tmp = y / (t / z);
	elseif (z <= 1.32e+70)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	else
		tmp = z * (y / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -4e+179], N[(y / N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.32e+70], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -3.99999999999999992e179

   1. Initial program 79.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 62.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 58.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 82.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   6. Simplified 68.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 68.4%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

      2. un-div-inv 68.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

   if -3.99999999999999992e179 < z < 1.3199999999999999e70

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 80.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 80.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   if 1.3199999999999999e70 < z

   1. Initial program 89.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 79.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   6. Simplified 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 69.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

      2. un-div-inv 69.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r/ 75.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 75.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+179}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.32 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 55.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.6 \cdot 10^{+51} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -8.6e+51) (not (<= y 3.8e-13))) (* z (/ y t)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.6e+51) || !(y <= 3.8e-13)) {
		tmp = z * (y / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-8.6d+51)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3.8d-13))) then
        tmp = z * (y / t)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.6e+51) || !(y <= 3.8e-13)) {
		tmp = z * (y / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -8.6e+51) or not (y <= 3.8e-13):
		tmp = z * (y / t)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -8.6e+51) || !(y <= 3.8e-13))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y / t));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -8.6e+51) || ~((y <= 3.8e-13)))
		tmp = z * (y / t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -8.6e+51], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3.8e-13]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.5999999999999994e51 or 3.8e-13 < y

   1. Initial program 82.4%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 48.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 64.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   6. Simplified 57.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 57.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

      2. un-div-inv 57.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 57.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r/ 61.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 61.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

   if -8.5999999999999994e51 < y < 3.8e-13

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.6 \cdot 10^{+51} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 54.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+52} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.05e+52) (not (<= y 3.5e-13))) (* y (/ z t)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.05e+52) || !(y <= 3.5e-13)) {
		tmp = y * (z / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.05d+52)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3.5d-13))) then
        tmp = y * (z / t)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.05e+52) || !(y <= 3.5e-13)) {
		tmp = y * (z / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.05e+52) or not (y <= 3.5e-13):
		tmp = y * (z / t)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.05e+52) || !(y <= 3.5e-13))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z / t));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.05e+52) || ~((y <= 3.5e-13)))
		tmp = y * (z / t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.05e+52], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3.5e-13]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.05e52 or 3.5000000000000002e-13 < y

   1. Initial program 82.4%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 48.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 64.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   6. Simplified 57.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   if -1.05e52 < y < 3.5000000000000002e-13

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+52} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(z - x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- z x) (/ y t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((z - x) * (y / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((z - x) * (y / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((z - x) * (y / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((z - x) * (y / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z - x) * Float64(y / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((z - x) * (y / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 91.5%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 87.5%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t} + \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 87.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot z}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 87.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

   3. associate-*r/ 88.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

   4. mul-1-neg 88.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

   5. associate-/l* 91.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right)\right) \]

   6. distribute-lft-neg-in 91.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right) \]

   7. distribute-rgt-in 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   8. sub-neg 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \]

5. Simplified 97.3%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(z - x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 38.7% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 91.5%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 40.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 90.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \left(x \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \left(-z\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (+ (* x (/ y t)) (* (- z) (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y / t)) + Float64(Float64(-z) * Float64(y / t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(x * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[((-z) * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024170 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, D"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- x (+ (* x (/ y t)) (* (- z) (/ y t)))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (- z x)) t)))