Statistics.Distribution.Poisson.Internal:probability from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 7.4s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 1.0×

• Could not converge on a ground truth

  1. x = 8.245236720503076e+25
  2. y = 2.3733959215675533e-246
  3. z = -0.2663351325380352

• 59.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x + (y * Math.log(y))) - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x + (y * math.log(y))) - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * log(y))) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x + (y * Math.log(y))) - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x + (y * math.log(y))) - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * log(y))) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x + (y * Math.log(y))) - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x + (y * math.log(y))) - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * log(y))) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 92.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x - z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{t\_0 - z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (log y))))
   (if (<= t_0 2e+83) (exp (- x z)) (exp (- t_0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 2e+83) {
		tmp = exp((x - z));
	} else {
		tmp = exp((t_0 - z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * log(y)
    if (t_0 <= 2d+83) then
        tmp = exp((x - z))
    else
        tmp = exp((t_0 - z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * Math.log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 2e+83) {
		tmp = Math.exp((x - z));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp((t_0 - z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * math.log(y)
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= 2e+83:
		tmp = math.exp((x - z))
	else:
		tmp = math.exp((t_0 - z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * log(y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= 2e+83)
		tmp = exp(Float64(x - z));
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(t_0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * log(y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= 2e+83)
		tmp = exp((x - z));
	else
		tmp = exp((t_0 - z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 2e+83], N[Exp[N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[N[(t$95$0 - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y (log.f64 y)) < 2.00000000000000006e83

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{x - z}} \]

   if 2.00000000000000006e83 < (*.f64 y (log.f64 y))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y - z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 72.6% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{-z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -28000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -6.3 \cdot 10^{-180}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;{y}^{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (exp (- z))))
   (if (<= z -28000000000000.0)
     t_0
     (if (<= z -6.3e-180) (exp x) (if (<= z 1.05e+50) (pow y y) t_0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = exp(-z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -28000000000000.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= -6.3e-180) {
		tmp = exp(x);
	} else if (z <= 1.05e+50) {
		tmp = pow(y, y);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = exp(-z)
    if (z <= (-28000000000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= (-6.3d-180)) then
        tmp = exp(x)
    else if (z <= 1.05d+50) then
        tmp = y ** y
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = Math.exp(-z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -28000000000000.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= -6.3e-180) {
		tmp = Math.exp(x);
	} else if (z <= 1.05e+50) {
		tmp = Math.pow(y, y);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = math.exp(-z)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -28000000000000.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= -6.3e-180:
		tmp = math.exp(x)
	elif z <= 1.05e+50:
		tmp = math.pow(y, y)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = exp(Float64(-z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -28000000000000.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= -6.3e-180)
		tmp = exp(x);
	elseif (z <= 1.05e+50)
		tmp = y ^ y;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = exp(-z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -28000000000000.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= -6.3e-180)
		tmp = exp(x);
	elseif (z <= 1.05e+50)
		tmp = y ^ y;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -28000000000000.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, -6.3e-180], N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.05e+50], N[Power[y, y], $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.8e13 or 1.05e50 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 83.9%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 83.9%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   5. Simplified 83.9%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   if -2.8e13 < z < -6.2999999999999996e-180

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 74.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x}} \]

   if -6.2999999999999996e-180 < z < 1.05e50

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 78.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y - z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 73.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -16500000000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 710\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -16500000000.0) (not (<= x 710.0))) (exp x) (exp (- z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -16500000000.0) || !(x <= 710.0)) {
		tmp = exp(x);
	} else {
		tmp = exp(-z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-16500000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 710.0d0))) then
        tmp = exp(x)
    else
        tmp = exp(-z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -16500000000.0) || !(x <= 710.0)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(x);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp(-z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -16500000000.0) or not (x <= 710.0):
		tmp = math.exp(x)
	else:
		tmp = math.exp(-z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -16500000000.0) || !(x <= 710.0))
		tmp = exp(x);
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(-z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -16500000000.0) || ~((x <= 710.0)))
		tmp = exp(x);
	else
		tmp = exp(-z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -16500000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 710.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.65e10 or 710 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x}} \]

   if -1.65e10 < x < 710

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 71.4%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 71.4%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   5. Simplified 71.4%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -16500000000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 710\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 90.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x - z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{y}^{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.6e+95) (exp (- x z)) (pow y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.6e+95) {
		tmp = exp((x - z));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.6d+95) then
        tmp = exp((x - z))
    else
        tmp = y ** y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.6e+95) {
		tmp = Math.exp((x - z));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.6e+95:
		tmp = math.exp((x - z))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(y, y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.6e+95)
		tmp = exp(Float64(x - z));
	else
		tmp = y ^ y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.6e+95)
		tmp = exp((x - z));
	else
		tmp = y ^ y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.6e+95], N[Exp[N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Power[y, y], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.5999999999999999e95

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{x - z}} \]

   if 2.5999999999999999e95 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y - z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 62.2% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right) + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.05e+103)
   (+ 1.0 (* z (+ (* z (* z -0.16666666666666666)) -1.0)))
   (exp x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.05e+103) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = exp(x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.05d+103)) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (z * ((z * (z * (-0.16666666666666666d0))) + (-1.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = exp(x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.05e+103) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp(x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.05e+103:
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0))
	else:
		tmp = math.exp(x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.05e+103)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0)));
	else
		tmp = exp(x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.05e+103)
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = exp(x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.05e+103], N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(z * -0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.0500000000000001e103

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 95.7%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 95.7%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   5. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot z\right) - 1\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 95.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.16666666666666666 \cdot z\right)} - 1\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 95.7%

         \[\leadsto 1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right)} - 1\right) \]

   9. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right)} - 1\right) \]

   if -1.0500000000000001e103 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 55.1%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right) + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 41.7% accurate, 11.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+98}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right) + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot \left(0.5 + x \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -4.4e+98)
   (+ 1.0 (* z (+ (* z (* z -0.16666666666666666)) -1.0)))
   (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.5 (* x 0.16666666666666666))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4.4e+98) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * (0.5 + (x * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-4.4d+98)) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (z * ((z * (z * (-0.16666666666666666d0))) + (-1.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (x * (1.0d0 + (x * (0.5d0 + (x * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4.4e+98) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * (0.5 + (x * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -4.4e+98:
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0))
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * (0.5 + (x * 0.16666666666666666)))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -4.4e+98)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.5 + Float64(x * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -4.4e+98)
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * (0.5 + (x * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -4.4e+98], N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(z * -0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.5 + N[(x * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.40000000000000017e98

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 93.7%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 93.7%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   5. Simplified 93.7%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot z\right) - 1\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 93.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.16666666666666666 \cdot z\right)} - 1\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 93.7%

         \[\leadsto 1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right)} - 1\right) \]

   9. Simplified 93.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right)} - 1\right) \]

   if -4.40000000000000017e98 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 54.9%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 30.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+98}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right) + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot \left(0.5 + x \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 39.9% accurate, 12.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right) + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -8.5e+52)
   (+ 1.0 (* z (+ (* z (* z -0.16666666666666666)) -1.0)))
   (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 1.0 (* x 0.5))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8.5e+52) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * 0.5)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-8.5d+52)) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (z * ((z * (z * (-0.16666666666666666d0))) + (-1.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (x * (1.0d0 + (x * 0.5d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8.5e+52) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * 0.5)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -8.5e+52:
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0))
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * 0.5)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -8.5e+52)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * 0.5))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -8.5e+52)
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * 0.5)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -8.5e+52], N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(z * -0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(1.0 + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8.49999999999999994e52

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 92.8%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 92.8%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   5. Simplified 92.8%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot z\right) - 1\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 80.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.16666666666666666 \cdot z\right)} - 1\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 80.9%

         \[\leadsto 1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right)} - 1\right) \]

   9. Simplified 80.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right)} - 1\right) \]

   if -8.49999999999999994e52 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 55.5%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 29.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + x \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 40.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right) + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 36.8% accurate, 14.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x 4.8e+87) (+ 1.0 (* z (+ (* z 0.5) -1.0))) (+ 1.0 (* x (* x 0.5)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 4.8e+87) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (x * 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 4.8d+87) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (z * ((z * 0.5d0) + (-1.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (x * (x * 0.5d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 4.8e+87) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (x * 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 4.8e+87:
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (x * 0.5))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 4.8e+87)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.5) + -1.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(x * 0.5)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 4.8e+87)
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (x * 0.5));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, 4.8e+87], N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 4.79999999999999963e87

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.8%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 59.8%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   5. Simplified 59.8%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 32.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot z - 1\right)} \]

   if 4.79999999999999963e87 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 97.3%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + x \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 67.2%

         \[\leadsto 1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 67.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 37.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 36.6% accurate, 17.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+85}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x 9.2e+85) (+ 1.0 (* z (* z 0.5))) (+ 1.0 (* x (* x 0.5)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 9.2e+85) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * (z * 0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (x * 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 9.2d+85) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (z * (z * 0.5d0))
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (x * (x * 0.5d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 9.2e+85) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * (z * 0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (x * 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 9.2e+85:
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * (z * 0.5))
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (x * 0.5))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 9.2e+85)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(z * 0.5)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(x * 0.5)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 9.2e+85)
		tmp = 1.0 + (z * (z * 0.5));
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (x * (x * 0.5));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, 9.2e+85], N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(z * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 9.1999999999999996e85

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.8%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 59.8%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   5. Simplified 59.8%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 32.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot z - 1\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 32.6%

      \[\leadsto 1 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot z\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 32.6%

         \[\leadsto 1 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 32.6%

      \[\leadsto 1 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   if 9.1999999999999996e85 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 97.3%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + x \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 67.2%

         \[\leadsto 1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 67.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 28.1% accurate, 29.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ 1.0 (* x (* x 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 1.0 + (x * (x * 0.5));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 1.0d0 + (x * (x * 0.5d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 1.0 + (x * (x * 0.5));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 1.0 + (x * (x * 0.5))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(x * 0.5)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 1.0 + (x * (x * 0.5));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.3%

   \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 28.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + x \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot x\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 27.9%

   \[\leadsto 1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot x\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 27.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

7. Simplified 27.9%

   \[\leadsto 1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 14.7% accurate, 69.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- 1.0 z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 1.0 - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 1.0d0 - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 1.0 - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 1.0 - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(1.0 - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 1.0 - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 55.4%

   \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 55.4%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

5. Simplified 55.4%

   \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 16.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + -1 \cdot z} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 16.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   2. unsub-neg 16.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - z} \]

8. Simplified 16.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - z} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 14.8% accurate, 69.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.3%

   \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 16.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + x} \]

5. Final simplification 16.0%

   \[\leadsto x + 1 \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 14.4% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 1.0)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return 1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := 1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.3%

   \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 15.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x - z\right) + \log y \cdot y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (+ (- x z) (* (log y) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x - z) + (log(y) * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x - z) + (log(y) * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x - z) + (Math.log(y) * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x - z) + (math.log(y) * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x - z) + Float64(log(y) * y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x - z) + (log(y) * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024170 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Poisson.Internal:probability from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (exp (+ (- x z) (* (log y) y))))

  (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))