Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Axis:tickPosition from plot-0.2.3.4

Percentage Accurate: 97.7% → 97.7%

Time: 8.8s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 25.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) (/ z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y - x) * (z / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * Float64(z / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) (/ z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y - x) * (z / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * Float64(z / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y - x}{\frac{t}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (- y x) (/ t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y - x) / (t / z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y - x) / (t / z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) / Float64(t / z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 98.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

   2. un-div-inv 98.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y - x}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 98.5%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y - x}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 85.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-104} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-135}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -3.2e-104) (not (<= y 5.6e-135)))
   (+ x (* y (/ z t)))
   (* x (- 1.0 (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.2e-104) || !(y <= 5.6e-135)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-3.2d-104)) .or. (.not. (y <= 5.6d-135))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.2e-104) || !(y <= 5.6e-135)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -3.2e-104) or not (y <= 5.6e-135):
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -3.2e-104) || !(y <= 5.6e-135))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -3.2e-104) || ~((y <= 5.6e-135)))
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3.2e-104], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 5.6e-135]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.19999999999999989e-104 or 5.60000000000000047e-135 < y

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 82.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 90.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   5. Simplified 90.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   if -3.19999999999999989e-104 < y < 5.60000000000000047e-135

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 94.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 94.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-104} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-135}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 50.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+154} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+63}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \frac{z}{-t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.05e+154) (not (<= z 8.6e+63))) (* x (/ z (- t))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.05e+154) || !(z <= 8.6e+63)) {
		tmp = x * (z / -t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.05d+154)) .or. (.not. (z <= 8.6d+63))) then
        tmp = x * (z / -t)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.05e+154) || !(z <= 8.6e+63)) {
		tmp = x * (z / -t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.05e+154) or not (z <= 8.6e+63):
		tmp = x * (z / -t)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.05e+154) || !(z <= 8.6e+63))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z / Float64(-t)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.05e+154) || ~((z <= 8.6e+63)))
		tmp = x * (z / -t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.05e+154], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 8.6e+63]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z / (-t)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.04999999999999997e154 or 8.6000000000000001e63 < z

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 54.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 54.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 54.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 54.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 49.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 49.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot z}{t}} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 49.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-z}}{t} \]

   8. Simplified 49.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-z}{t}} \]

   if -1.04999999999999997e154 < z < 8.6000000000000001e63

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 58.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 55.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+154} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+63}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \frac{z}{-t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 49.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{+154} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+65}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-\frac{z}{\frac{t}{x}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -6.6e+154) (not (<= z 1.8e+65))) (- (/ z (/ t x))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.6e+154) || !(z <= 1.8e+65)) {
		tmp = -(z / (t / x));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-6.6d+154)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.8d+65))) then
        tmp = -(z / (t / x))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.6e+154) || !(z <= 1.8e+65)) {
		tmp = -(z / (t / x));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -6.6e+154) or not (z <= 1.8e+65):
		tmp = -(z / (t / x))
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -6.6e+154) || !(z <= 1.8e+65))
		tmp = Float64(-Float64(z / Float64(t / x)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -6.6e+154) || ~((z <= 1.8e+65)))
		tmp = -(z / (t / x));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -6.6e+154], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.8e+65]], $MachinePrecision]], (-N[(z / N[(t / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.6e154 or 1.79999999999999989e65 < z

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 54.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 54.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 54.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 54.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 49.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 49.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot z}{t}} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 49.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-z}}{t} \]

   8. Simplified 49.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-z}{t}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 49.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-z}{t} \cdot x} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 49.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in 49.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{z}{t} \cdot x} \]

      4. associate-/r/ 43.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t}{x}}} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 43.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{z}{\frac{t}{x}}} \]

   if -6.6e154 < z < 1.79999999999999989e65

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 58.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{+154} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+65}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-\frac{z}{\frac{t}{x}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 97.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) (/ z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y - x) * (z / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * Float64(z / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 65.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 (/ z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * (1.0 - (z / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x * (1.0d0 - (z / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * (1.0 - (z / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x * (1.0 - (z / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(z / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 64.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

   2. unsub-neg 64.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

5. Simplified 64.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 38.9% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 42.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ t_2 := x + \frac{y - x}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 < -1013646692435.8867:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 < 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (- y x) (/ z t))) (t_2 (+ x (/ (- y x) (/ t z)))))
   (if (< t_1 -1013646692435.8867)
     t_2
     (if (< t_1 0.0) (+ x (/ (* (- y x) z) t)) t_2))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (y - x) * (z / t);
	double t_2 = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 < -1013646692435.8867) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_1 < 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (y - x) * (z / t)
    t_2 = x + ((y - x) / (t / z))
    if (t_1 < (-1013646692435.8867d0)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (t_1 < 0.0d0) then
        tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t)
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (y - x) * (z / t);
	double t_2 = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 < -1013646692435.8867) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_1 < 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (y - x) * (z / t)
	t_2 = x + ((y - x) / (t / z))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 < -1013646692435.8867:
		tmp = t_2
	elif t_1 < 0.0:
		tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t)
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(y - x) * Float64(z / t))
	t_2 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) / Float64(t / z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 < -1013646692435.8867)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_1 < 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * z) / t));
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (y - x) * (z / t);
	t_2 = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 < -1013646692435.8867)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_1 < 0.0)
		tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[t$95$1, -1013646692435.8867], t$95$2, If[Less[t$95$1, 0.0], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024170 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Axis:tickPosition from plot-0.2.3.4"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< (* (- y x) (/ z t)) -10136466924358867/10000) (+ x (/ (- y x) (/ t z))) (if (< (* (- y x) (/ z t)) 0) (+ x (/ (* (- y x) z) t)) (+ x (/ (- y x) (/ t z))))))

  (+ x (* (- y x) (/ z t))))