Numeric.Histogram:binBounds from Chart-1.5.3

Percentage Accurate: 93.1% → 97.8%

Time: 8.7s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 24.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (* (- y x) z) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (((y - x) * z) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (((y - x) * z) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * z) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (* (- y x) z) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (((y - x) * z) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (((y - x) * z) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * z) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) (/ z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y - x) * (z / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y - x) * (z / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * Float64(z / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * (z / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.6%

   \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

3. Simplified 97.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 84.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-39} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.25 \cdot 10^{-224}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.12e-39) (not (<= y 3.25e-224)))
   (+ x (* y (/ z t)))
   (* x (- 1.0 (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.12e-39) || !(y <= 3.25e-224)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.12d-39)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3.25d-224))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.12e-39) || !(y <= 3.25e-224)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.12e-39) or not (y <= 3.25e-224):
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.12e-39) || !(y <= 3.25e-224))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.12e-39) || ~((y <= 3.25e-224)))
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.12e-39], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3.25e-224]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.12e-39 or 3.25e-224 < y

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 85.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 87.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   7. Simplified 87.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   if -1.12e-39 < y < 3.25e-224

   1. Initial program 93.1%

      \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-39} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.25 \cdot 10^{-224}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 83.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.9 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{-188}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -4.9e-40)
   (+ x (* y (/ z t)))
   (if (<= y 1.16e-188) (* x (- 1.0 (/ z t))) (+ x (/ (* y z) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4.9e-40) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	} else if (y <= 1.16e-188) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y * z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-4.9d-40)) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
    else if (y <= 1.16d-188) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (z / t))
    else
        tmp = x + ((y * z) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4.9e-40) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	} else if (y <= 1.16e-188) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y * z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -4.9e-40:
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
	elif y <= 1.16e-188:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((y * z) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -4.9e-40)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	elseif (y <= 1.16e-188)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(z / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -4.9e-40)
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	elseif (y <= 1.16e-188)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	else
		tmp = x + ((y * z) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, -4.9e-40], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.16e-188], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -4.8999999999999997e-40

   1. Initial program 92.0%

      \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 87.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 91.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   7. Simplified 91.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   if -4.8999999999999997e-40 < y < 1.16e-188

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 94.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 94.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   if 1.16e-188 < y

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot z}}{t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 84.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 84.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.9 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{-188}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 50.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2600000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-32}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \frac{z}{-t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2600000000000.0) (not (<= z 3.7e-32))) (* x (/ z (- t))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2600000000000.0) || !(z <= 3.7e-32)) {
		tmp = x * (z / -t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2600000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.7d-32))) then
        tmp = x * (z / -t)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2600000000000.0) || !(z <= 3.7e-32)) {
		tmp = x * (z / -t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2600000000000.0) or not (z <= 3.7e-32):
		tmp = x * (z / -t)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2600000000000.0) || !(z <= 3.7e-32))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z / Float64(-t)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2600000000000.0) || ~((z <= 3.7e-32)))
		tmp = x * (z / -t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2600000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.7e-32]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z / (-t)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.6e12 or 3.7e-32 < z

   1. Initial program 87.8%

      \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 51.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 51.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 51.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 43.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 43.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg2 43.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z}{-t}} \]

   10. Simplified 43.4%

       \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z}{-t}} \]

   if -2.6e12 < z < 3.7e-32

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2600000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-32}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \frac{z}{-t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 92.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + z \cdot \frac{y - x}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (* z (/ (- y x) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (z * ((y - x) / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (z * ((y - x) / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (z * ((y - x) / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (z * ((y - x) / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y - x) / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (z * ((y - x) / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.6%

   \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

3. Simplified 97.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 90.0%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot z}{t} + \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 90.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot z}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]

   2. associate-*r/ 87.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot z}{t}\right) \]

   3. associate-/l* 90.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \frac{z}{t} + -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

   4. associate-*r* 90.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \frac{z}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}}\right) \]

   5. neg-mul-1 90.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \frac{z}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right) \]

   6. distribute-rgt-out 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t} \cdot \left(y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   7. sub-neg 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{z}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right)} \]

   8. associate-*l/ 93.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)}{t}} \]

   9. associate-*r/ 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y - x}{t}} \]

7. Simplified 94.3%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y - x}{t}} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 65.6% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 (/ z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * (1.0 - (z / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x * (1.0d0 - (z / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * (1.0 - (z / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x * (1.0 - (z / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(z / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.6%

   \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

3. Simplified 97.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 62.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 62.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

   2. unsub-neg 62.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

7. Simplified 62.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 39.4% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.6%

   \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

3. Simplified 97.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 36.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x < -9.025511195533005 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z}{t} \cdot \left(x - y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x < 4.275032163700715 \cdot 10^{-250}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y - x}{t} \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y - x}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< x -9.025511195533005e-135)
   (- x (* (/ z t) (- x y)))
   (if (< x 4.275032163700715e-250)
     (+ x (* (/ (- y x) t) z))
     (+ x (/ (- y x) (/ t z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x < -9.025511195533005e-135) {
		tmp = x - ((z / t) * (x - y));
	} else if (x < 4.275032163700715e-250) {
		tmp = x + (((y - x) / t) * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x < (-9.025511195533005d-135)) then
        tmp = x - ((z / t) * (x - y))
    else if (x < 4.275032163700715d-250) then
        tmp = x + (((y - x) / t) * z)
    else
        tmp = x + ((y - x) / (t / z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x < -9.025511195533005e-135) {
		tmp = x - ((z / t) * (x - y));
	} else if (x < 4.275032163700715e-250) {
		tmp = x + (((y - x) / t) * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x < -9.025511195533005e-135:
		tmp = x - ((z / t) * (x - y))
	elif x < 4.275032163700715e-250:
		tmp = x + (((y - x) / t) * z)
	else:
		tmp = x + ((y - x) / (t / z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x < -9.025511195533005e-135)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(z / t) * Float64(x - y)));
	elseif (x < 4.275032163700715e-250)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) / t) * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) / Float64(t / z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x < -9.025511195533005e-135)
		tmp = x - ((z / t) * (x - y));
	elseif (x < 4.275032163700715e-250)
		tmp = x + (((y - x) / t) * z);
	else
		tmp = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Less[x, -9.025511195533005e-135], N[(x - N[(N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Less[x, 4.275032163700715e-250], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024170 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.Histogram:binBounds from Chart-1.5.3"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< x -1805102239106601/200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (- x (* (/ z t) (- x y))) (if (< x 855006432740143/2000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ x (* (/ (- y x) t) z)) (+ x (/ (- y x) (/ t z))))))

  (+ x (/ (* (- y x) z) t)))