Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, D

Percentage Accurate: 92.6% → 97.8%

Time: 8.9s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

• 25.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (* y (- z x)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * (z - x)) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z - x)) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (* y (- z x)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * (z - x)) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z - x)) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (/ y t) (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y / t) * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y / t) * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y / t) * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y / t) * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y / t) * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y / t) * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.8%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 85.7%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t} + \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 85.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot z}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 85.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

   3. associate-*r/ 88.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

   4. mul-1-neg 88.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

   5. associate-/l* 90.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right)\right) \]

   6. distribute-lft-neg-in 90.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right) \]

   7. distribute-rgt-in 98.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   8. sub-neg 98.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \]

5. Simplified 98.3%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 85.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+67} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+130}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.4e+67) (not (<= x 1.3e+130)))
   (* x (- 1.0 (/ y t)))
   (+ x (* (/ y t) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.4e+67) || !(x <= 1.3e+130)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4.4d+67)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.3d+130))) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (y / t))
    else
        tmp = x + ((y / t) * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.4e+67) || !(x <= 1.3e+130)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.4e+67) or not (x <= 1.3e+130):
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.4e+67) || !(x <= 1.3e+130))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y / t) * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4.4e+67) || ~((x <= 1.3e+130)))
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	else
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.4e+67], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.3e+130]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.4e67 or 1.2999999999999999e130 < x

   1. Initial program 87.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 90.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 90.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   if -4.4e67 < x < 1.2999999999999999e130

   1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 89.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t} + \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot z}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

      3. associate-*r/ 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

      4. mul-1-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-/l* 90.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right)\right) \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 90.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-in 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      8. sub-neg 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 91.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+67} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+130}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 83.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{+65} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.72 \cdot 10^{+131}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -7.4e+65) (not (<= x 1.72e+131)))
   (* x (- 1.0 (/ y t)))
   (+ x (* y (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7.4e+65) || !(x <= 1.72e+131)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-7.4d+65)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.72d+131))) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (y / t))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7.4e+65) || !(x <= 1.72e+131)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -7.4e+65) or not (x <= 1.72e+131):
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -7.4e+65) || !(x <= 1.72e+131))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -7.4e+65) || ~((x <= 1.72e+131)))
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -7.4e+65], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.72e+131]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -7.39999999999999989e65 or 1.71999999999999994e131 < x

   1. Initial program 87.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 90.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 90.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   if -7.39999999999999989e65 < x < 1.71999999999999994e131

   1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 87.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   5. Simplified 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{+65} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.72 \cdot 10^{+131}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 77.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{-48} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-35}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{z - x}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -5.3e-48) (not (<= y 4.6e-35)))
   (* y (/ (- z x) t))
   (* x (- 1.0 (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5.3e-48) || !(y <= 4.6e-35)) {
		tmp = y * ((z - x) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-5.3d-48)) .or. (.not. (y <= 4.6d-35))) then
        tmp = y * ((z - x) / t)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (y / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5.3e-48) || !(y <= 4.6e-35)) {
		tmp = y * ((z - x) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -5.3e-48) or not (y <= 4.6e-35):
		tmp = y * ((z - x) / t)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -5.3e-48) || !(y <= 4.6e-35))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z - x) / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -5.3e-48) || ~((y <= 4.6e-35)))
		tmp = y * ((z - x) / t);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -5.3e-48], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4.6e-35]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.3e-48 or 4.5999999999999998e-35 < y

   1. Initial program 86.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{z}{t} - \frac{x}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 80.6%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z - x}{t}} \]

   if -5.3e-48 < y < 4.5999999999999998e-35

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{-48} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-35}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{z - x}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 72.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+14} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+40}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.3e+14) (not (<= z 2.2e+40)))
   (/ z (/ t y))
   (* x (- 1.0 (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.3e+14) || !(z <= 2.2e+40)) {
		tmp = z / (t / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.3d+14)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.2d+40))) then
        tmp = z / (t / y)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (y / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.3e+14) || !(z <= 2.2e+40)) {
		tmp = z / (t / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.3e+14) or not (z <= 2.2e+40):
		tmp = z / (t / y)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.3e+14) || !(z <= 2.2e+40))
		tmp = Float64(z / Float64(t / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.3e+14) || ~((z <= 2.2e+40)))
		tmp = z / (t / y);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.3e+14], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.2e+40]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z / N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.3e14 or 2.1999999999999999e40 < z

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 66.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{z}{t} - \frac{x}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 63.4%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 63.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t} \cdot y} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 71.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

   if -1.3e14 < z < 2.1999999999999999e40

   1. Initial program 92.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+14} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+40}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 85.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{x}{\frac{t}{y}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -3.2e+65)
   (- x (/ x (/ t y)))
   (if (<= x 1.05e+130) (+ x (* (/ y t) z)) (* x (- 1.0 (/ y t))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.2e+65) {
		tmp = x - (x / (t / y));
	} else if (x <= 1.05e+130) {
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-3.2d+65)) then
        tmp = x - (x / (t / y))
    else if (x <= 1.05d+130) then
        tmp = x + ((y / t) * z)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (y / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.2e+65) {
		tmp = x - (x / (t / y));
	} else if (x <= 1.05e+130) {
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -3.2e+65:
		tmp = x - (x / (t / y))
	elif x <= 1.05e+130:
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -3.2e+65)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(x / Float64(t / y)));
	elseif (x <= 1.05e+130)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y / t) * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -3.2e+65)
		tmp = x - (x / (t / y));
	elseif (x <= 1.05e+130)
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, -3.2e+65], N[(x - N[(x / N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.05e+130], N[(x + N[(N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -3.20000000000000007e65

   1. Initial program 86.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t} + \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 79.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot z}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 79.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

      3. associate-*r/ 79.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

      4. mul-1-neg 79.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-/l* 93.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right)\right) \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 93.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      8. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]

      2. clear-num 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z - x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

      3. un-div-inv 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{z - x}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{z - x}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{\frac{t}{y}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 91.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-x}}{\frac{t}{y}} \]

   10. Simplified 91.1%

       \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-x}}{\frac{t}{y}} \]

   if -3.20000000000000007e65 < x < 1.04999999999999995e130

   1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 89.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t} + \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot z}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

      3. associate-*r/ 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

      4. mul-1-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-/l* 90.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right)\right) \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 90.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-in 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      8. sub-neg 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 91.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   if 1.04999999999999995e130 < x

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 90.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 90.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{x}{\frac{t}{y}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 85.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - x \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+131}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -5.8e+66)
   (- x (* x (/ y t)))
   (if (<= x 4.8e+131) (+ x (* (/ y t) z)) (* x (- 1.0 (/ y t))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.8e+66) {
		tmp = x - (x * (y / t));
	} else if (x <= 4.8e+131) {
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-5.8d+66)) then
        tmp = x - (x * (y / t))
    else if (x <= 4.8d+131) then
        tmp = x + ((y / t) * z)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (y / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.8e+66) {
		tmp = x - (x * (y / t));
	} else if (x <= 4.8e+131) {
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -5.8e+66:
		tmp = x - (x * (y / t))
	elif x <= 4.8e+131:
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -5.8e+66)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(x * Float64(y / t)));
	elseif (x <= 4.8e+131)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y / t) * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -5.8e+66)
		tmp = x - (x * (y / t));
	elseif (x <= 4.8e+131)
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, -5.8e+66], N[(x - N[(x * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 4.8e+131], N[(x + N[(N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -5.79999999999999972e66

   1. Initial program 86.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t} + \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 79.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot z}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 79.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

      3. associate-*r/ 79.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

      4. mul-1-neg 79.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-/l* 93.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right)\right) \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 93.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      8. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]

      2. clear-num 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z - x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

      3. un-div-inv 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{z - x}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{z - x}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{\frac{t}{y}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 91.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-x}}{\frac{t}{y}} \]

   10. Simplified 91.1%

       \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-x}}{\frac{t}{y}} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. neg-mul-1 91.1%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

       2. unsub-neg 91.1%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

       3. distribute-lft-out-- 91.1%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 1 - x \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]

       4. *-rgt-identity 91.1%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} - x \cdot \frac{y}{t} \]

   13. Simplified 91.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - x \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]

   if -5.79999999999999972e66 < x < 4.7999999999999999e131

   1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 89.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t} + \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot z}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

      3. associate-*r/ 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right) \]

      4. mul-1-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-/l* 90.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right)\right) \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 90.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-in 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      8. sub-neg 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 91.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   if 4.7999999999999999e131 < x

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 90.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 90.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 53.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2000000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-39}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2000000000000.0) (not (<= z 5.2e-39))) (/ z (/ t y)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2000000000000.0) || !(z <= 5.2e-39)) {
		tmp = z / (t / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2000000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.2d-39))) then
        tmp = z / (t / y)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2000000000000.0) || !(z <= 5.2e-39)) {
		tmp = z / (t / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2000000000000.0) or not (z <= 5.2e-39):
		tmp = z / (t / y)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2000000000000.0) || !(z <= 5.2e-39))
		tmp = Float64(z / Float64(t / y));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2000000000000.0) || ~((z <= 5.2e-39)))
		tmp = z / (t / y);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2000000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.2e-39]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z / N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2e12 or 5.2e-39 < z

   1. Initial program 89.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{z}{t} - \frac{x}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 61.8%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 61.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t} \cdot y} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 69.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

   if -2e12 < z < 5.2e-39

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 59.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2000000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-39}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 55.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.11 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.05 \cdot 10^{-43}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -0.11) (not (<= y 3.05e-43))) (* y (/ z t)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.11) || !(y <= 3.05e-43)) {
		tmp = y * (z / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-0.11d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3.05d-43))) then
        tmp = y * (z / t)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.11) || !(y <= 3.05e-43)) {
		tmp = y * (z / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -0.11) or not (y <= 3.05e-43):
		tmp = y * (z / t)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -0.11) || !(y <= 3.05e-43))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z / t));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -0.11) || ~((y <= 3.05e-43)))
		tmp = y * (z / t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -0.11], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3.05e-43]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -0.110000000000000001 or 3.05000000000000019e-43 < y

   1. Initial program 86.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 78.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{z}{t} - \frac{x}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 61.9%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t}} \]

   if -0.110000000000000001 < y < 3.05000000000000019e-43

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 65.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.11 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.05 \cdot 10^{-43}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 39.1% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.8%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 39.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 90.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \left(x \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \left(-z\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (+ (* x (/ y t)) (* (- z) (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y / t)) + Float64(Float64(-z) * Float64(y / t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(x * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[((-z) * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024170 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, D"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- x (+ (* x (/ y t)) (* (- z) (/ y t)))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (- z x)) t)))