Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 98.1% → 99.5%

Time: 10.0s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.4×

• 31.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.5% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* z (+ t (* x (/ y z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (t + (x * (y / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (t + (x * (y / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = z * (t + (x * (y / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t + Float64(x * Float64(y / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = z * (t + (x * (y / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(z * N[(t + N[(x * N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 20.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 40.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 40.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{z}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma x y (fma a b (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(x, y, fma(a, b, (z * t)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(x, y, fma(a, b, Float64(z * t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * y + N[(a * b + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (fma x y (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(x, y, (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

3. Simplified 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 54.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-71}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -2e+70)
   (* a b)
   (if (<= (* a b) -4e-71) (* z t) (if (<= (* a b) 5e+40) (* x y) (* a b)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+70) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= -4e-71) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5e+40) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-2d+70)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((a * b) <= (-4d-71)) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if ((a * b) <= 5d+40) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+70) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= -4e-71) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5e+40) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -2e+70:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (a * b) <= -4e-71:
		tmp = z * t
	elif (a * b) <= 5e+40:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -2e+70)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= -4e-71)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 5e+40)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+70)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((a * b) <= -4e-71)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 5e+40)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+70], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -4e-71], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 5e+40], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.00000000000000015e70 or 5.00000000000000003e40 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -2.00000000000000015e70 < (*.f64 a b) < -3.9999999999999997e-71

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{z} + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x \cdot y}{z} + \frac{a \cdot b}{z}\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 94.5%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(t + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{z}} + \frac{a \cdot b}{z}\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 88.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(t + \left(x \cdot \frac{y}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{b}{z}}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 88.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \left(x \cdot \frac{y}{z} + a \cdot \frac{b}{z}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{a \cdot b}{z}\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 63.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{b}{z}}\right) \]

   10. Simplified 63.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + a \cdot \frac{b}{z}\right)} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in t around inf 51.0%

       \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]

   if -3.9999999999999997e-71 < (*.f64 a b) < 5.00000000000000003e40

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + a \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 59.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + \frac{a \cdot b}{x}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 53.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+42} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+51}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + \frac{z \cdot t}{x}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -5e+42) (not (<= (* x y) 2e+51)))
   (* x (+ y (/ (* z t) x)))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+42) || !((x * y) <= 2e+51)) {
		tmp = x * (y + ((z * t) / x));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-5d+42)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 2d+51))) then
        tmp = x * (y + ((z * t) / x))
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+42) || !((x * y) <= 2e+51)) {
		tmp = x * (y + ((z * t) / x));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -5e+42) or not ((x * y) <= 2e+51):
		tmp = x * (y + ((z * t) / x))
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -5e+42) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 2e+51))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + Float64(Float64(z * t) / x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+42) || ~(((x * y) <= 2e+51)))
		tmp = x * (y + ((z * t) / x));
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e+42], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+51]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -5.00000000000000007e42 or 2e51 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 72.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + \frac{t \cdot z}{x}\right)} \]

   if -5.00000000000000007e42 < (*.f64 x y) < 2e51

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+42} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+51}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + \frac{z \cdot t}{x}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 84.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+70} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -2e+70) (not (<= (* a b) 2e-27)))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))
   (+ (* x y) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -2e+70) || !((a * b) <= 2e-27)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-2d+70)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 2d-27))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -2e+70) || !((a * b) <= 2e-27)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+70) or not ((a * b) <= 2e-27):
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -2e+70) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 2e-27))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -2e+70) || ~(((a * b) <= 2e-27)))
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+70], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 2e-27]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.00000000000000015e70 or 2.0000000000000001e-27 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]

   if -2.00000000000000015e70 < (*.f64 a b) < 2.0000000000000001e-27

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 81.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+70} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 79.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+151} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1e+151) (not (<= (* x y) 1e+68)))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+151) || !((x * y) <= 1e+68)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1d+151)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 1d+68))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+151) || !((x * y) <= 1e+68)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+151) or not ((x * y) <= 1e+68):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1e+151) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1e+68))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+151) || ~(((x * y) <= 1e+68)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+151], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+68]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.00000000000000002e151 or 9.99999999999999953e67 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + a \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + \frac{a \cdot b}{x}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 76.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -1.00000000000000002e151 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.99999999999999953e67

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+151} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 85.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+19}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -2e+70)
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))
   (if (<= (* a b) 5e+19) (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (+ (* a b) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+70) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5e+19) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-2d+70)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else if ((a * b) <= 5d+19) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+70) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5e+19) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -2e+70:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	elif (a * b) <= 5e+19:
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -2e+70)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 5e+19)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+70)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	elseif ((a * b) <= 5e+19)
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+70], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 5e+19], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.00000000000000015e70

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]

   if -2.00000000000000015e70 < (*.f64 a b) < 5e19

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]

   if 5e19 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + a \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+19}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 54.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+60} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+43}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -7.5e+60) (not (<= (* a b) 2.8e+43))) (* a b) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -7.5e+60) || !((a * b) <= 2.8e+43)) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-7.5d+60)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 2.8d+43))) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -7.5e+60) || !((a * b) <= 2.8e+43)) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -7.5e+60) or not ((a * b) <= 2.8e+43):
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -7.5e+60) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 2.8e+43))
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -7.5e+60) || ~(((a * b) <= 2.8e+43)))
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -7.5e+60], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 2.8e+43]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -7.5e60 or 2.80000000000000019e43 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -7.5e60 < (*.f64 a b) < 2.80000000000000019e43

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 57.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + a \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 57.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + \frac{a \cdot b}{x}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 48.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+60} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+43}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 35.5% accurate, 3.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

3. Simplified 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 36.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024170 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))