Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 96.0% → 98.5%

Time: 10.2s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 0.4×

• 40.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 96.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.5% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z + \left(x \cdot \frac{y}{t} + a \cdot \frac{b}{t}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* t (+ z (+ (* x (/ y t)) (* a (/ b t))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z + ((x * (y / t)) + (a * (b / t))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z + ((x * (y / t)) + (a * (b / t))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = t * (z + ((x * (y / t)) + (a * (b / t))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(z + Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y / t)) + Float64(a * Float64(b / t)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t * (z + ((x * (y / t)) + (a * (b / t))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(t * N[(z + N[(N[(x * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(b / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 30.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 30.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 60.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 70.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 70.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 30.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 50.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z + \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{t} + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 50.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x \cdot y}{t} + \frac{a \cdot b}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 60.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{t}} + \frac{a \cdot b}{t}\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 80.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(z + \left(x \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{b}{t}}\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z + \left(x \cdot \frac{y}{t} + a \cdot \frac{b}{t}\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z + \left(x \cdot \frac{y}{t} + a \cdot \frac{b}{t}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.0% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma a b (fma x y (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, (z * t))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, Float64(z * t))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(a * b + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.1%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 88.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+274}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(b + \frac{x \cdot y}{a}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 500000:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (* a b) -2e+274)
     (* a (+ b (/ (* x y) a)))
     (if (<= (* a b) -2e+70)
       (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
       (if (<= (* a b) 500000.0) (+ (* c i) t_1) (+ (* a b) t_1))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+274) {
		tmp = a * (b + ((x * y) / a));
	} else if ((a * b) <= -2e+70) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else if ((a * b) <= 500000.0) {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
    if ((a * b) <= (-2d+274)) then
        tmp = a * (b + ((x * y) / a))
    else if ((a * b) <= (-2d+70)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else if ((a * b) <= 500000.0d0) then
        tmp = (c * i) + t_1
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+274) {
		tmp = a * (b + ((x * y) / a));
	} else if ((a * b) <= -2e+70) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else if ((a * b) <= 500000.0) {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -2e+274:
		tmp = a * (b + ((x * y) / a))
	elif (a * b) <= -2e+70:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	elif (a * b) <= 500000.0:
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -2e+274)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(Float64(x * y) / a)));
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= -2e+70)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 500000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+274)
		tmp = a * (b + ((x * y) / a));
	elseif ((a * b) <= -2e+70)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	elseif ((a * b) <= 500000.0)
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+274], N[(a * N[(b + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+70], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 500000.0], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -1.99999999999999984e274

   1. Initial program 80.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 80.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 80.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 80.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 88.0%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around inf 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{x \cdot y}{a}\right)} \]

   if -1.99999999999999984e274 < (*.f64 a b) < -2.00000000000000015e70

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -2.00000000000000015e70 < (*.f64 a b) < 5e5

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 5e5 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+274}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(b + \frac{x \cdot y}{a}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 500000:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 65.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.1 \cdot 10^{+96}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* a b))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -4.1e+96)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) -5e-24)
       (+ (* a b) (* z t))
       (if (<= (* x y) 3.2e-24) (+ (* a b) (* c i)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -4.1e+96) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -5e-24) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 3.2e-24) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b)
    if ((x * y) <= (-4.1d+96)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= (-5d-24)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 3.2d-24) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -4.1e+96) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -5e-24) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 3.2e-24) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -4.1e+96:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= -5e-24:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 3.2e-24:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -4.1e+96)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -5e-24)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 3.2e-24)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -4.1e+96)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -5e-24)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 3.2e-24)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4.1e+96], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e-24], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 3.2e-24], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.09999999999999998e96 or 3.20000000000000012e-24 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -4.09999999999999998e96 < (*.f64 x y) < -4.9999999999999998e-24

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 68.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -4.9999999999999998e-24 < (*.f64 x y) < 3.20000000000000012e-24

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 69.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.1 \cdot 10^{+96}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 63.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.62 \cdot 10^{+94}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+163}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1.62e+94)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) -5.8e-24)
     (+ (* a b) (* z t))
     (if (<= (* x y) 5.6e+163) (+ (* a b) (* c i)) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.62e+94) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -5.8e-24) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5.6e+163) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-1.62d+94)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= (-5.8d-24)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 5.6d+163) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.62e+94) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -5.8e-24) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5.6e+163) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1.62e+94:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= -5.8e-24:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 5.6e+163:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1.62e+94)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -5.8e-24)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 5.6e+163)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.62e+94)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -5.8e-24)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 5.6e+163)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.62e+94], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5.8e-24], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5.6e+163], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.61999999999999997e94 or 5.60000000000000029e163 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 88.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.61999999999999997e94 < (*.f64 x y) < -5.7999999999999997e-24

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 68.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -5.7999999999999997e-24 < (*.f64 x y) < 5.60000000000000029e163

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 64.8%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.62 \cdot 10^{+94}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+163}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 87.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+64} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-24}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -5.8e+64) (not (<= (* x y) 3.3e-24)))
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5.8e+64) || !((x * y) <= 3.3e-24)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-5.8d+64)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 3.3d-24))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5.8e+64) || !((x * y) <= 3.3e-24)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -5.8e+64) or not ((x * y) <= 3.3e-24):
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -5.8e+64) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 3.3e-24))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -5.8e+64) || ~(((x * y) <= 3.3e-24)))
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5.8e+64], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 3.3e-24]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -5.79999999999999986e64 or 3.29999999999999984e-24 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 87.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -5.79999999999999986e64 < (*.f64 x y) < 3.29999999999999984e-24

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+64} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-24}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 85.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+100} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+163}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -4.5e+100) (not (<= (* x y) 3.6e+163)))
   (+ (* x y) (* a b))
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.5e+100) || !((x * y) <= 3.6e+163)) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-4.5d+100)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 3.6d+163))) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.5e+100) || !((x * y) <= 3.6e+163)) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -4.5e+100) or not ((x * y) <= 3.6e+163):
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -4.5e+100) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 3.6e+163))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.5e+100) || ~(((x * y) <= 3.6e+163)))
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4.5e+100], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 3.6e+163]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.50000000000000036e100 or 3.59999999999999978e163 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 88.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -4.50000000000000036e100 < (*.f64 x y) < 3.59999999999999978e163

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+100} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+163}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 42.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-143}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -4.8e+65)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) 6e-143) (* c i) (if (<= (* x y) 6.5e+35) (* a b) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -4.8e+65) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 6e-143) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 6.5e+35) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-4.8d+65)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= 6d-143) then
        tmp = c * i
    else if ((x * y) <= 6.5d+35) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -4.8e+65) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 6e-143) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 6.5e+35) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -4.8e+65:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= 6e-143:
		tmp = c * i
	elif (x * y) <= 6.5e+35:
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -4.8e+65)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 6e-143)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 6.5e+35)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -4.8e+65)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 6e-143)
		tmp = c * i;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 6.5e+35)
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4.8e+65], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 6e-143], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 6.5e+35], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.8000000000000003e65 or 6.5000000000000003e35 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 77.0%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -4.8000000000000003e65 < (*.f64 x y) < 5.9999999999999997e-143

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 43.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if 5.9999999999999997e-143 < (*.f64 x y) < 6.5000000000000003e35

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 54.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 65.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+81} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1.55e+81) (not (<= (* x y) 7.5e-11)))
   (+ (* x y) (* a b))
   (+ (* c i) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.55e+81) || !((x * y) <= 7.5e-11)) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1.55d+81)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 7.5d-11))) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.55e+81) || !((x * y) <= 7.5e-11)) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1.55e+81) or not ((x * y) <= 7.5e-11):
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1.55e+81) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 7.5e-11))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.55e+81) || ~(((x * y) <= 7.5e-11)))
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.55e+81], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 7.5e-11]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.55e81 or 7.5e-11 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 80.0%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.55e81 < (*.f64 x y) < 7.5e-11

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+81} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 63.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{+93} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+163}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -7.4e+93) (not (<= (* x y) 6.5e+163)))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -7.4e+93) || !((x * y) <= 6.5e+163)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-7.4d+93)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 6.5d+163))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -7.4e+93) || !((x * y) <= 6.5e+163)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -7.4e+93) or not ((x * y) <= 6.5e+163):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -7.4e+93) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 6.5e+163))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -7.4e+93) || ~(((x * y) <= 6.5e+163)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -7.4e+93], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 6.5e+163]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -7.39999999999999974e93 or 6.4999999999999998e163 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 88.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -7.39999999999999974e93 < (*.f64 x y) < 6.4999999999999998e163

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 62.0%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{+93} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+163}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 36.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-87}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.18 \cdot 10^{-20}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+166}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -3.6e-87)
   (* z t)
   (if (<= t 1.18e-20) (* c i) (if (<= t 6.2e+166) (* a b) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -3.6e-87) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if (t <= 1.18e-20) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if (t <= 6.2e+166) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-3.6d-87)) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if (t <= 1.18d-20) then
        tmp = c * i
    else if (t <= 6.2d+166) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -3.6e-87) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if (t <= 1.18e-20) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if (t <= 6.2e+166) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -3.6e-87:
		tmp = z * t
	elif t <= 1.18e-20:
		tmp = c * i
	elif t <= 6.2e+166:
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -3.6e-87)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (t <= 1.18e-20)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (t <= 6.2e+166)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -3.6e-87)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif (t <= 1.18e-20)
		tmp = c * i;
	elseif (t <= 6.2e+166)
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[t, -3.6e-87], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.18e-20], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 6.2e+166], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -3.59999999999999993e-87 or 6.19999999999999966e166 < t

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 58.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 44.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -3.59999999999999993e-87 < t < 1.1800000000000001e-20

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 39.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if 1.1800000000000001e-20 < t < 6.19999999999999966e166

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 40.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 41.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-87}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.18 \cdot 10^{-20}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+166}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 43.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+63} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+98}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -6.2e+63) (not (<= (* a b) 3.1e+98))) (* a b) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -6.2e+63) || !((a * b) <= 3.1e+98)) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-6.2d+63)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 3.1d+98))) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = c * i
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -6.2e+63) || !((a * b) <= 3.1e+98)) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -6.2e+63) or not ((a * b) <= 3.1e+98):
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = c * i
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -6.2e+63) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 3.1e+98))
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -6.2e+63) || ~(((a * b) <= 3.1e+98)))
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = c * i;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -6.2e+63], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 3.1e+98]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -6.2000000000000001e63 or 3.10000000000000019e98 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 54.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -6.2000000000000001e63 < (*.f64 a b) < 3.10000000000000019e98

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 37.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+63} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+98}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 27.3% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.1%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 24.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024170 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))