SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.4% → 98.5%

Time: 11.8s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 0.7×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+207}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y\_m, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 9e+207)
   (fma y_m (* z (- (tanh (/ t y_m)) (tanh (/ x y_m)))) x)
   (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 9e+207) {
		tmp = fma(y_m, (z * (tanh((t / y_m)) - tanh((x / y_m)))), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 9e+207)
		tmp = fma(y_m, Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) - tanh(Float64(x / y_m)))), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 9e+207], N[(y$95$m * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 9.00000000000000006e207

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 9.00000000000000006e207 < y

   1. Initial program 67.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 94.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+299}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* (- (tanh (/ t y_m)) (tanh (/ x y_m))) (* y_m z)))))
   (if (<= t_1 2e+299) t_1 (+ x (* z (- t x))))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y_m)) - tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+299) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y_m)) - tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z))
    if (t_1 <= 2d+299) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((Math.tanh((t / y_m)) - Math.tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+299) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	t_1 = x + ((math.tanh((t / y_m)) - math.tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= 2e+299:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) - tanh(Float64(x / y_m))) * Float64(y_m * z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 2e+299)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y_m)) - tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+299)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+299], t$95$1, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 2.0000000000000001e299

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 2.0000000000000001e299 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

   1. Initial program 31.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 94.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+299}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y\_m, z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot t - y\_m \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 1.35e+50)
   (fma y_m (* z (tanh (/ t y_m))) x)
   (+ x (- (* z t) (* y_m (* z (tanh (/ x y_m))))))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.35e+50) {
		tmp = fma(y_m, (z * tanh((t / y_m))), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (y_m * (z * tanh((x / y_m)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1.35e+50)
		tmp = fma(y_m, Float64(z * tanh(Float64(t / y_m))), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(y_m * Float64(z * tanh(Float64(x / y_m))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.35e+50], N[(y$95$m * N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y$95$m * N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.35e50

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 25.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)}, x\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 25.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right), x\right) \]

      2. div-sub 25.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}, x\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 25.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 25.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 81.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   7. Simplified 81.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   if 1.35e50 < y

   1. Initial program 78.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 78.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 67.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 67.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 55.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 55.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 55.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)}\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 55.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 55.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      5. rec-exp 56.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \left(-y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{x}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      6. rec-exp 56.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \left(-y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}} - e^{-\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      7. tanh-def-a 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \left(-y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 88.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot t - y\_m \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 1.8e+50)
   (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y_m)) (* y_m z)))
   (+ x (- (* z t) (* y_m (* z (tanh (/ x y_m))))))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.8e+50) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (y_m * (z * tanh((x / y_m)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 1.8d+50) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z))
    else
        tmp = x + ((z * t) - (y_m * (z * tanh((x / y_m)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.8e+50) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (y_m * (z * Math.tanh((x / y_m)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 1.8e+50:
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (y_m * (z * math.tanh((x / y_m)))))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1.8e+50)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) * Float64(y_m * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(y_m * Float64(z * tanh(Float64(x / y_m))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 1.8e+50)
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	else
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (y_m * (z * tanh((x / y_m)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.8e+50], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y$95$m * N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.79999999999999993e50

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 25.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 81.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 81.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 1.79999999999999993e50 < y

   1. Initial program 78.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 78.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 67.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 67.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 55.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 55.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 55.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)}\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 55.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 55.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      5. rec-exp 56.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \left(-y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{x}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      6. rec-exp 56.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \left(-y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}} - e^{-\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      7. tanh-def-a 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \left(-y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 88.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot t - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 87.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 4.05 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t\_1 \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot t\_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y_m))))
   (if (<= y_m 4.05e+49)
     (+ x (* t_1 (* y_m z)))
     (+ x (* z (- (* y_m t_1) x))))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 4.05e+49) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y_m))
    if (y_m <= 4.05d+49) then
        tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 4.05e+49) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y_m))
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 4.05e+49:
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y_m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 4.05e+49)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t_1 * Float64(y_m * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y_m * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 4.05e+49)
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 4.05e+49], N[(x + N[(t$95$1 * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y$95$m * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.04999999999999989e49

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 25.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 81.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 81.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 4.04999999999999989e49 < y

   1. Initial program 78.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 51.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 51.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 83.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.05 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 84.3% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 1e+51) (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y_m)) (* y_m z))) (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1e+51) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 1d+51) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1e+51) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 1e+51:
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1e+51)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) * Float64(y_m * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 1e+51)
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1e+51], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1e51

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 25.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 24.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 81.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 81.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 1e51 < y

   1. Initial program 78.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 83.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 77.9% accurate, 17.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 4.35 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 4.35e+49) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 4.35e+49) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 4.35d+49) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 4.35e+49) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 4.35e+49:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 4.35e+49)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 4.35e+49)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 4.35e+49], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.35e49

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 4.35e49 < y

   1. Initial program 78.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 83.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 66.5% accurate, 21.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 1.45e+51) x (* x (- 1.0 z))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.45e+51) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 1.45d+51) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.45e+51) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 1.45e+51:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1.45e+51)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 1.45e+51)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.45e+51], x, N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.4499999999999999e51

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 65.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.4499999999999999e51 < y

   1. Initial program 79.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 79.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 88.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t - x}{y}}, x\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 57.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 57.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. *-rgt-identity 57.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 1} + \left(-x \cdot z\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 57.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      4. mul-1-neg 57.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-in 57.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]

      6. mul-1-neg 57.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      7. unsub-neg 57.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 57.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 59.9% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	return x

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.6%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. associate-*l* 95.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   3. fma-define 95.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 59.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024165 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))